feat(gatekeeper): add PR merge automation service
Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline failed
Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline failed
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7,11 +7,13 @@ The initial implementation (commit 6878d57) was high quality but included placeh
|
||||
## Security-Critical Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. JWT Token Validation (CRITICAL)
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem**: `validateToken()` always returns `valid: false`
|
||||
**Risk**: Cannot verify authenticity of federated tokens
|
||||
**Solution**: Implement proper JWT validation with signature verification
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. OIDC Discovery (CRITICAL)
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem**: `generateAuthUrl()` returns hardcoded placeholder URL
|
||||
**Risk**: Cannot initiate real federated authentication flows
|
||||
**Solution**: Implement OIDC discovery and proper authorization URL generation
|
||||
@@ -19,9 +21,11 @@ The initial implementation (commit 6878d57) was high quality but included placeh
|
||||
## Implementation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Add Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Add `jose` library for JWT handling (industry-standard, secure)
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Implement JWT Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Fetch OIDC discovery metadata from issuer
|
||||
- [ ] Cache JWKS (JSON Web Key Set) for performance
|
||||
- [ ] Verify JWT signature using remote public key
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +35,7 @@ The initial implementation (commit 6878d57) was high quality but included placeh
|
||||
- [ ] Return proper validation results
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Implement OIDC Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Fetch `.well-known/openid-configuration` from remote instance
|
||||
- [ ] Cache discovery metadata
|
||||
- [ ] Generate proper OAuth2 authorization URL
|
||||
@@ -39,6 +44,7 @@ The initial implementation (commit 6878d57) was high quality but included placeh
|
||||
- [ ] Support standard OIDC scopes (openid, profile, email)
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Update Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Replace mock-based tests with real behavior tests
|
||||
- [ ] Test valid JWT validation
|
||||
- [ ] Test expired/invalid token rejection
|
||||
@@ -47,6 +53,7 @@ The initial implementation (commit 6878d57) was high quality but included placeh
|
||||
- [ ] Maintain 85%+ test coverage
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Security Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
- Cache JWKS to avoid excessive network calls
|
||||
- Validate token expiration strictly
|
||||
- Use PKCE to prevent authorization code interception
|
||||
@@ -57,6 +64,7 @@ The initial implementation (commit 6878d57) was high quality but included placeh
|
||||
## Implementation Notes
|
||||
|
||||
**PKCE Flow**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Generate random code_verifier (base64url-encoded random bytes)
|
||||
2. Generate code_challenge = base64url(SHA256(code_verifier))
|
||||
3. Store code_verifier in session/database
|
||||
@@ -64,6 +72,7 @@ The initial implementation (commit 6878d57) was high quality but included placeh
|
||||
5. Send code_verifier in token exchange
|
||||
|
||||
**JWT Validation Flow**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Parse JWT without verification to get header
|
||||
2. Fetch JWKS from issuer (cache for 1 hour)
|
||||
3. Find matching key by kid (key ID)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user