feat: Expand fleet to 23 skills across all domains
New skills (14): - nestjs-best-practices: 40 priority-ranked rules (kadajett) - fastapi: Pydantic v2, async SQLAlchemy, JWT auth (jezweb) - architecture-patterns: Clean Architecture, Hexagonal, DDD (wshobson) - python-performance-optimization: Profiling and optimization (wshobson) - ai-sdk: Vercel AI SDK streaming and agent patterns (vercel) - create-agent: Modular agent architecture with OpenRouter (openrouterteam) - proactive-agent: WAL Protocol, compaction recovery, self-improvement (halthelobster) - brand-guidelines: Brand identity enforcement (anthropics) - ui-animation: Motion design with accessibility (mblode) - marketing-ideas: 139 ideas across 14 categories (coreyhaines31) - pricing-strategy: SaaS pricing and tier design (coreyhaines31) - programmatic-seo: SEO at scale with playbooks (coreyhaines31) - competitor-alternatives: Comparison page architecture (coreyhaines31) - referral-program: Referral and affiliate programs (coreyhaines31) README reorganized by domain: Code Quality, Frontend, Backend, Auth, AI/Agent Building, Marketing, Design, Meta. Mosaic Stack is not limited to coding — the Orchestrator serves coding, business, design, marketing, writing, logistics, and analysis. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jason Woltje
212
skills/competitor-alternatives/references/templates.md
Normal file
212
skills/competitor-alternatives/references/templates.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
|
||||
# Section Templates for Competitor Pages
|
||||
|
||||
Ready-to-use templates for each section of competitor comparison pages.
|
||||
|
||||
## TL;DR Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Start every page with a quick summary for scanners:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
**TL;DR**: [Competitor] excels at [strength] but struggles with [weakness].
|
||||
[Your product] is built for [your focus], offering [key differentiator].
|
||||
Choose [Competitor] if [their ideal use case]. Choose [You] if [your ideal use case].
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Paragraph Comparison (Not Just Tables)
|
||||
|
||||
For each major dimension, write a paragraph:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Features
|
||||
|
||||
[Competitor] offers [description of their feature approach].
|
||||
Their strength is [specific strength], which works well for [use case].
|
||||
However, [limitation] can be challenging for [user type].
|
||||
|
||||
[Your product] takes a different approach with [your approach].
|
||||
This means [benefit], though [honest tradeoff].
|
||||
Teams who [specific need] often find this more effective.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Feature Comparison Section
|
||||
|
||||
Go beyond checkmarks:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Feature Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
### [Feature Category]
|
||||
|
||||
**[Competitor]**: [2-3 sentence description of how they handle this]
|
||||
- Strengths: [specific]
|
||||
- Limitations: [specific]
|
||||
|
||||
**[Your product]**: [2-3 sentence description]
|
||||
- Strengths: [specific]
|
||||
- Limitations: [specific]
|
||||
|
||||
**Bottom line**: Choose [Competitor] if [scenario]. Choose [You] if [scenario].
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Pricing Comparison Section
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Pricing
|
||||
|
||||
| | [Competitor] | [Your Product] |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Free tier | [Details] | [Details] |
|
||||
| Starting price | $X/user/mo | $X/user/mo |
|
||||
| Business tier | $X/user/mo | $X/user/mo |
|
||||
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
|
||||
|
||||
**What's included**: [Competitor]'s $X plan includes [features], while
|
||||
[Your product]'s $X plan includes [features].
|
||||
|
||||
**Total cost consideration**: Beyond per-seat pricing, consider [hidden costs,
|
||||
add-ons, implementation]. [Competitor] charges extra for [X], while
|
||||
[Your product] includes [Y] in base pricing.
|
||||
|
||||
**Value comparison**: For a 10-person team, [Competitor] costs approximately
|
||||
$X/year while [Your product] costs $Y/year, with [key differences in what you get].
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Service & Support Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Service & Support
|
||||
|
||||
| | [Competitor] | [Your Product] |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Documentation | [Quality assessment] | [Quality assessment] |
|
||||
| Response time | [SLA if known] | [Your SLA] |
|
||||
| Support channels | [List] | [List] |
|
||||
| Onboarding | [What they offer] | [What you offer] |
|
||||
| CSM included | [At what tier] | [At what tier] |
|
||||
|
||||
**Support quality**: Based on [G2/Capterra reviews, your research],
|
||||
[Competitor] support is described as [assessment]. Common feedback includes
|
||||
[quotes or themes].
|
||||
|
||||
[Your product] offers [your support approach]. [Specific differentiator like
|
||||
response time, dedicated CSM, implementation help].
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Who It's For Section
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Who Should Choose [Competitor]
|
||||
|
||||
[Competitor] is the right choice if:
|
||||
- [Specific use case or need]
|
||||
- [Team type or size]
|
||||
- [Workflow or requirement]
|
||||
- [Budget or priority]
|
||||
|
||||
**Ideal [Competitor] customer**: [Persona description in 1-2 sentences]
|
||||
|
||||
## Who Should Choose [Your Product]
|
||||
|
||||
[Your product] is built for teams who:
|
||||
- [Specific use case or need]
|
||||
- [Team type or size]
|
||||
- [Workflow or requirement]
|
||||
- [Priority or value]
|
||||
|
||||
**Ideal [Your product] customer**: [Persona description in 1-2 sentences]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Section
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Switching from [Competitor]
|
||||
|
||||
### What transfers
|
||||
- [Data type]: [How easily, any caveats]
|
||||
- [Data type]: [How easily, any caveats]
|
||||
|
||||
### What needs reconfiguration
|
||||
- [Thing]: [Why and effort level]
|
||||
- [Thing]: [Why and effort level]
|
||||
|
||||
### Migration support
|
||||
|
||||
We offer [migration support details]:
|
||||
- [Free data import tool / white-glove migration]
|
||||
- [Documentation / migration guide]
|
||||
- [Timeline expectation]
|
||||
- [Support during transition]
|
||||
|
||||
### What customers say about switching
|
||||
|
||||
> "[Quote from customer who switched]"
|
||||
> — [Name], [Role] at [Company]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Social Proof Section
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on switchers:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## What Customers Say
|
||||
|
||||
### Switched from [Competitor]
|
||||
|
||||
> "[Specific quote about why they switched and outcome]"
|
||||
> — [Name], [Role] at [Company]
|
||||
|
||||
> "[Another quote]"
|
||||
> — [Name], [Role] at [Company]
|
||||
|
||||
### Results after switching
|
||||
- [Company] saw [specific result]
|
||||
- [Company] reduced [metric] by [amount]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison Table Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Beyond Checkmarks
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of:
|
||||
| Feature | You | Competitor |
|
||||
|---------|-----|-----------|
|
||||
| Feature A | ✓ | ✓ |
|
||||
| Feature B | ✓ | ✗ |
|
||||
|
||||
Do this:
|
||||
| Feature | You | Competitor |
|
||||
|---------|-----|-----------|
|
||||
| Feature A | Full support with [detail] | Basic support, [limitation] |
|
||||
| Feature B | [Specific capability] | Not available |
|
||||
|
||||
### Organize by Category
|
||||
|
||||
Group features into meaningful categories:
|
||||
- Core functionality
|
||||
- Collaboration
|
||||
- Integrations
|
||||
- Security & compliance
|
||||
- Support & service
|
||||
|
||||
### Include Ratings Where Useful
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | You | Competitor | Notes |
|
||||
|----------|-----|-----------|-------|
|
||||
| Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | [Brief note] |
|
||||
| Feature depth | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | [Brief note] |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user