docs(tess): define interaction agent mission
This commit is contained in:
46
docs/tess/THREAT-MODEL.md
Normal file
46
docs/tess/THREAT-MODEL.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
# Tess Threat Model
|
||||
|
||||
## Assets and Trust Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
Assets: operator identity, tenant/project data, agent sessions, fleet control, approvals, credentials, memories, tool outputs, audit evidence, and provider transports.
|
||||
|
||||
Trust boundaries: Discord→plugin, CLI→gateway, plugin→gateway service identity, gateway→Pi/provider, Tess→Mos/fleet, Tess→Hermes, MCP→gateway, persistence, and tmux/Matrix transports.
|
||||
|
||||
## Threat Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Severity | Threat | Required control | Required verification |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| TM-01 | critical | Client invokes admin/system command without role | Server-side scope/role enforcement in executor; durable approval for privileged/destructive commands | Authenticated non-admin and forged-scope tests deny and audit |
|
||||
| TM-02 | critical | Cross-user/tenant list, attach, send, or terminate by guessed session ID | Owner/tenant binding on every session operation; admin override is explicit and audited | Cross-tenant matrix for REST, WS, CLI, Discord and provider methods |
|
||||
| TM-03 | high | MCP caller supplies another `userId` | Remove actor IDs from schemas; derive actor/tenant from authenticated context; per-tool scopes | Forged actor/tool calls deny; no victim data returned |
|
||||
| TM-04 | high | Discord ingress impersonates user/channel or bypasses gateway auth | Service-to-service identity, guild/channel/user allowlists, signed/correlated envelope, replay protection | Invalid service identity, unlisted IDs, replayed message IDs all deny |
|
||||
| TM-05 | high | Secrets/PII leak in chat, auth links, tool args, logs, memory, or DB | Redact before persistence/egress; DM/out-of-band auth flow; short-lived hashed token state; output classification | Seeded secret/PII canary absent from durable stores/logs/public channel |
|
||||
| TM-06 | high | Prompt/tool injection escalates from content to privileged action | Treat messages/files/tool output as untrusted data; structured proposals only; allowlisted tools; approval binds exact action digest | Injection corpus cannot invoke unapproved tools or alter authority |
|
||||
| TM-07 | high | Approval forged, replayed, or applied to modified action | One-time approval with actor, tenant, action digest, expiry, correlation and consumption record | Forged/replayed/expired/mutated approvals deny and audit |
|
||||
| TM-08 | medium | Restart causes message loss or duplicate side effects | Durable inbox/outbox/checkpoint; idempotency keys; transactional state transitions; bounded replay | Kill/restart at each state transition; exactly-once effect or safe dedupe |
|
||||
| TM-09 | medium | Session GC/retention crosses tenant/session scope | Session/user-scoped GC or separately authorized global retention job | GC one session; unrelated logs/memory remain unchanged |
|
||||
| TM-10 | high | tmux/Matrix transport target or identity spoofing | Exact target/socket binding, peer identity verification, Matrix whoami, authenticated transport metadata | Wrong socket/peer/room/identity refuses delivery/attach |
|
||||
| TM-11 | medium | Hermes adapter exposes unsupported or broader legacy powers | Capability negotiation, default deny, normalized scopes, adapter sandbox/timeouts | Unsupported and over-scoped operations fail closed |
|
||||
| TM-12 | medium | Tess competes with Mos or bypasses orchestration gates | Authority policy and correlated Mos handoff; no Tess worker-claim capability by default | Coding/decomposition intent produces handoff, not direct claim |
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Invariants
|
||||
|
||||
1. Authentication is not authorization; every command/tool/provider operation is authorized server-side.
|
||||
2. Actor, tenant, roles, and channel bindings come only from authenticated gateway context.
|
||||
3. No client-provided session ID grants ownership or attachment.
|
||||
4. No privileged action executes without a matching, unexpired, one-time approval when policy requires it.
|
||||
5. Redaction occurs before persistence and before channel egress.
|
||||
6. Every externally caused operation is replay-safe and correlated.
|
||||
7. Provider capability absence is a denial, not an invitation to shell around it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Existing Findings That Block Tess
|
||||
|
||||
- Command executor lacks server-side enforcement for declared scopes.
|
||||
- Session list/reuse/destroy surfaces are not owner-filtered consistently.
|
||||
- MCP schemas accept caller-supplied user identity.
|
||||
- Discord plugin lacks a complete authenticated service ingress and user/channel allowlists.
|
||||
- Chat/tool persistence lacks mandatory redaction.
|
||||
- Sessions/pending Discord output are in-memory and not restart-safe.
|
||||
- Session GC currently performs globally scoped promotion.
|
||||
|
||||
These are tracked as M1 security prerequisites and must pass independent security review before Tess ingress is enabled.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user