fix(fleet): correct operator documentation validation
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -20,6 +20,15 @@ These are accepted existing DAG boundaries, not omissions silently claimed as de
|
||||
|
||||
M5 docs describe prerequisites and the preview boundary only. A ready preview is not migration or rollback evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
## Explicit validate-operation gap
|
||||
|
||||
- `FCM-REQ-03` requires a documented programmatic `mosaic fleet validate` operation.
|
||||
- The current CLI does not expose that operation. Existing mutation/reconcile validation and the
|
||||
documentation example test are not a replacement for the missing command.
|
||||
- FCM-M5-001 documents this implementation gap without inventing syntax, JSON, exit behavior, or an
|
||||
owning implementation card. Parent #758 must remain open until the requirement is implemented and
|
||||
evidenced or the PRD/DAG is explicitly revised through the authoritative process.
|
||||
|
||||
## FCM-M5-002 hold
|
||||
|
||||
- Deterministic source-versus-installed asset revision detection and safe refresh implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user