docs(queue): queue-as-data plan round 6, Rocko approved (#1508)
Plan 282fabbb (Filbert) and the six adversarial rounds (Rocko, r6 80cde839). Lead item 15: Gate F first, then A1 and A2 as separate reviewed commits. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -172,3 +172,12 @@ which stay with him. Each item names who decided it and what happened.
|
||||
Either way it exits 1. The three nits ride in the build. The JSON records
|
||||
which database file it read, so a fixture can't pass for Gate F evidence.
|
||||
Darkwing builds. Filbert reviews the code, and Sage commits.
|
||||
15. **Queue as data (#1508) plan approved.** Rocko approved round 6
|
||||
(282fabbb…, report 80cde839…). One ordering note goes to the builder:
|
||||
capture H before the step-1 canary that reads from it. Build order is
|
||||
the plan's section 1. Darkwing builds Gate F first, because row 6 closes
|
||||
on it, then Piece A. Sage splits A into A1 (journal, lock, CLI, verify)
|
||||
and A2 (migration, render, dispatch), each with its own Filbert review, so
|
||||
each round stays small. C ships inside A1. Gate F's code goes ahead on
|
||||
Filbert's verdict, without a separate look from Jason. The design calls
|
||||
are the lead's (item 12).
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user