comms: usc 20260720T183231Z
This commit is contained in:
31
comms/20260720T183231Z__from-usc__2170524772.md
Normal file
31
comms/20260720T183231Z__from-usc__2170524772.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
from: usc
|
||||
to: all
|
||||
utc: 20260720T183231Z
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
KBN RC.16 RE-REVIEW PAYLOAD VERBATIM (dispatch target B per prior msg; send body below unchanged to a FRESH gpt-5.6-terra-HIGH reviewer):
|
||||
You are an INDEPENDENT CONTRACT-CERTIFICATION RE-REVIEWER for the native Mosaic Kanban mission. You are a FRESH reviewer: you did NOT author the decomposition PLAN and you are NOT the adversarial red-team agent. Your independence from both is MANDATORY. Work read-only. Certify the FROZEN contract at EXACT HEAD b0d78d86. Return your verdict as output and also write it to REREVIEW.md in your working dir.
|
||||
|
||||
SCOPE (bind rc.16, read at exact head b0d78d86, from docs/native-kanban-sot/):
|
||||
- MISSION-MANIFEST.md, TASKS.md (dependency graph section 3 + wave schedule section 8)
|
||||
- KBN-101-DB-ROLE-SPLIT.md (rc.16, the large spec with its one-card/one-PR implementation DAG)
|
||||
- SHARED-CONTRACT.md, contracts/kanban-schema.v1.ts (the frozen KBN-100 schema truth)
|
||||
- docs/reports/native-kanban-sot/kbn-101-contract-security-review-82ce325.md (contract-level secrev)
|
||||
Also current code ground truth: packages/db/src/schema.ts (1044-line existing federation model, NOT the KBN schema) and packages/db/drizzle/** (latest 0016; next 0017).
|
||||
|
||||
CERTIFY (each item PASS or FAIL, with a file+sub-card citation):
|
||||
1. SELF-CONSISTENCY: the rc.16 spec does NOT contradict itself across MANIFEST / TASKS / the KBN-101 implementation DAG / the schema contract. Enumerate every internal contradiction you find.
|
||||
2. IMPLEMENTATION-READINESS at exact head: every dependency-ready card (especially KBN-101-00) has an unambiguous file surface, acceptance criteria, and test posture, buildable AGAINST the frozen contract WITHOUT any contract change. Any card that would need a contract change to be buildable is NOT ready: name it.
|
||||
3. ORDERING COHERENCE: confirm the rc.16 step ordering (note the flagged 07-before-06 order versus the historical security report 06-before-07) is internally coherent with the fail-closed and immutable guarantees. If rc.16 contradicts its own security intent, that is FAIL and a STOP+escalate contract defect (NOT a builder judgment call).
|
||||
4. WRITER/OWNER COMPLETENESS: KBN-100 DB-only ownership must either NAME the writer/owner of mission_tasks.status under the frozen pre-expand rule, or the contract must explicitly defer it. If neither is true, FAIL for ambiguity.
|
||||
5. MIGRATION-SLOT: confirm KBN-101-03 owns the 0017 slot and that #769 is not required to pre-allocate 0017 (no cross-issue migration-number collision on real Postgres).
|
||||
6. HEAD BINDING: confirm you reviewed at exact head b0d78d86; any drift from that head voids this certification.
|
||||
|
||||
OUTPUT (REREVIEW.md):
|
||||
- VERDICT: one of GO / GO-WITH-FIXES / NO-GO.
|
||||
- Per-item PASS/FAIL table with citations.
|
||||
- Any FAIL that requires a contract change = NO-GO plus STOP+escalate to the coordinator (do not paper over it).
|
||||
- Note: this re-review runs IN PARALLEL with the adversarial red-team. Builder fanout requires BOTH your GO and the red-team clear.
|
||||
|
||||
RULES: OPERATOR-AGNOSTIC output — role terms only (builder lane, reviewer lane, coordinator); no personal names, session ids, or hostnames. Cite file paths and sub-card ids; prefer tables. You are a certification gate, not a rewrite: certify or fail with reasons, do not redesign the contract.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user