Row 286 C2-03b: BUILD.md notes for dewey-0869 and sage-2951 (fired-chief path :4308, marker-gated busy test, T9 scratch roles)
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
a1876928f4
commit
4d6c8234fa
1 file changed
+12
-8
@@ -196,8 +196,7 @@ Choices made without a ruling. Each is small and reversible:
|
||||
- T7 and T9 run the real verbs (dewey-0864, ruled by sage-2947: no SQL staging; replaces the
|
||||
staged state in cefebf65b). Until row 285 lands, the test passes its own definitions; once it lands
|
||||
the real chief definition carries gitea. Whichever of 285 and 286 lands second rebases and reruns
|
||||
library and bus whole (sage-2947). The chief's
|
||||
grant goes through decision.raise and the human's yes against fake-gitea-api.mjs. The test's own
|
||||
library and bus whole (sage-2947). The chief's grant goes through decision.raise and the human's yes against fake-gitea-api.mjs. The test's own
|
||||
definitions give chief-of-staff a gitea credential, as gitea-grant.test.mjs gives coder one. The
|
||||
real roles/chief-of-staff.json has `credentials: []`, so a live chief can't get one before C2-21.
|
||||
- Revoked: `grants.revoke`, then the row is gone and the fetch refuses.
|
||||
@@ -205,22 +204,27 @@ Choices made without a ruling. Each is small and reversible:
|
||||
refuses its own name (`organization-instance-referenced`, broker.mjs `#chiefLifecycle`). So the
|
||||
test's launch.by is `boss` (definition pm, the chief's authority), and boss fires the one listed
|
||||
chief-of-staff instance. Step G deletes the row (row 281), `roles.chief` stays, the fetch refuses.
|
||||
Only launch.by may call instance.fire (`role-not-chief`, broker.mjs:4308 at 94c33a43c) and it
|
||||
refuses its own name (:4335), so this is the only fired chief the verb allows. Accepted by
|
||||
sage-2951 as brief owner and read the same way in dewey-0869.
|
||||
- T9's revoked case runs `grants.revoke` on the runtime's own data root and store, between starts.
|
||||
T9's runtime gets a scratch roles/ whose chief-of-staff carries `{service: gitea}`, as row 285
|
||||
ships it (case2-rows.md:1823-1824), so its definitions match the grant's (dewey-0869). After a
|
||||
rebase onto 285 the copy needs no edit.
|
||||
- Delisted with the row still there, a `fire.stopped` with no `fire.done`, held, two chiefs and
|
||||
another project stay unit checks on the choice function with SQL fixtures.
|
||||
- "Another uid" in T5: the suite can't chown, so a PATH `stat` shim reports uid+1 for the open file.
|
||||
The real `id -u` compare is covered only through that shim (dewey-0864).
|
||||
- Two listed chiefs, or none listed, refuse `library-fetch-no-grant` (T8).
|
||||
- The race fetch inside `push()` takes sync's `running` guard (dewey-0864 R1, in this row per
|
||||
sage-2947). While a sync of the
|
||||
mirror runs it refuses `library-sync-busy`, fetches nothing, and the caller writes again. Test:
|
||||
"race fetch: while a sync of the mirror runs".
|
||||
sage-2947). While a sync of the mirror runs it refuses `library-sync-busy`, fetches nothing, and
|
||||
the caller writes again. Test: "race fetch: while a sync of the mirror runs". Its sync fetch is a
|
||||
git alias that touches a marker, then waits for a release file. The push starts after the marker
|
||||
exists and the release comes after the refusal, so nothing depends on timing (dewey-0869).
|
||||
- The slot at 0000: T9 covers the revoked case at runtime. Fired and held refuse inside the choice
|
||||
function, which takes no path and opens no file. `sync` with any `{ refused }` runs no git (library
|
||||
test, valid slot present).
|
||||
- First-run risks: T9's runtime rebuilds definitions from rolesDir, where chief-of-staff has no gitea
|
||||
credential. If giteaStart or reconcile then holds or drops the chief's grant, T9 part 1 fails. The
|
||||
fix would be in the test's setup, not in the product.
|
||||
- First-run reds in the new tests are mine to fix in setup and report afterwards (mos-1272).
|
||||
- The chief's evidence is any gitea grant event naming the chief, of any action (grant.applied,
|
||||
grant.revoked and the rest), per the plan. The spend event names no agent, so it doesn't count.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user