docs(tess): define Pi-native interaction agent mission (#712)
This commit was merged in pull request #712.
This commit is contained in:
58
docs/scratchpads/tess-20260712.md
Normal file
58
docs/scratchpads/tess-20260712.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
||||
# Scratchpad — Tess Interaction Agent
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-07-12 — Mission intake
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective:** Build a Pi-native GPT-5.6 Sol high-reasoning Mosaic interaction agent, named Tess, as Jason's primary Discord/CLI access point for Mosaic fleet and transitional Hermes capabilities. Tess complements Mos and must not become a competing orchestrator.
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue:** #706
|
||||
|
||||
**Budget:** No explicit cap provided. Original working estimate was 290K implementation/review tokens. That estimate is superseded after six security prerequisite tasks were added; revised arithmetic total is pending because the calculation tool was blocked by runtime consent. Run at most two workers; prefer one implementation lane plus one independent review/discovery lane. Re-estimate after planning approval and each milestone.
|
||||
|
||||
**Evidence gathered:**
|
||||
- Mosaic already provides Pi lifecycle hooks, fleet/tmux sessions, Matrix connector/controller pieces, typed chat events, Discord/Telegram channel plugins, and command/plugin registries.
|
||||
- Current `IProviderAdapter` is an LLM model/completion abstraction, not an external agent/session provider.
|
||||
- Required new seam is `AgentRuntimeProvider`: sessions, stream, message, terminate, hierarchy, attach, health, capabilities.
|
||||
- Recurring cross-runtime needs: unified memory/retrieval, Discord routing/approvals, agent state/inbox/compaction recovery, runtime bootstrap, fleet/incident controls, and GitOps workflow.
|
||||
- Project truth must remain in canonical project/Mosaic stores; semantic memory is retrieval/mirror.
|
||||
|
||||
**Decisions:**
|
||||
1. Name: Tess (tessera). Stable machine key `tess`; display name configurable.
|
||||
2. Mos owns orchestration; Tess delegates Mos-owned work through an explicit coordination contract.
|
||||
3. Gateway owns ingress/auth/routing; Discord and CLI remain thin clients.
|
||||
4. tmux/fleet ships first behind an adapter; Matrix/native Mosaic is the forward transport.
|
||||
5. Hermes integration is transitional and capability-negotiated; unsupported operations fail closed.
|
||||
6. No unrestricted Discord shell. Privileged/destructive/customer-visible actions require authorization and approval.
|
||||
|
||||
**Plan:**
|
||||
1. Land requirements/architecture/task graph.
|
||||
2. Deliver runtime contracts and security model.
|
||||
3. Deliver durable Pi service/state.
|
||||
4. Deliver Discord and CLI.
|
||||
5. Deliver fleet/Mos/Hermes/memory/tool plugins.
|
||||
6. Deliver Matrix/native transport, migration matrix, recovery, docs, and qualification.
|
||||
|
||||
**Progress:** Issue #706 created. PRD/manifest/tasks initialized on clean branch `feat/tess-interaction-agent` from `origin/main`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Risks:** 14 GB root filesystem headroom; active fleet lanes; broad migration scope; Discord privilege boundary; possible duplicate orchestration authority.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-07-12 — Independent planning and threat review
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict received:** BLOCK TESS-PLAN-001. Coding remains stopped.
|
||||
|
||||
**Blocking findings:** formal threat model absent; verification matrix absent; migration inventory implied but absent; non-existent task paths; AC-TESS-03 lacked a crisp test. Security review also identified command scope bypass, cross-tenant session attachment, MCP actor impersonation, unsafe Discord service ingress, pre-persistence/egress secret leakage, non-durable replay, and globally scoped GC.
|
||||
|
||||
**Remediation applied:**
|
||||
- Added `docs/tess/ARCHITECTURE.md`.
|
||||
- Added `docs/tess/THREAT-MODEL.md` with TM-01..12.
|
||||
- Added `docs/tess/VERIFICATION-MATRIX.md` mapping AC-TESS-01..11.
|
||||
- Added `docs/tess/MIGRATION-INVENTORY.md`.
|
||||
- Added hard requirements TESS-SEC-002..009.
|
||||
- Added six prerequisite security tasks before provider/ingress implementation.
|
||||
- Corrected task paths to existing package surfaces.
|
||||
- Added explicit GPT-5.6 Sol/high/tool-policy status verification for AC-TESS-03.
|
||||
|
||||
**Re-review 1:** BLOCK only on composite `repo` values that looked like nonexistent paths. Remediated by declaring comma-separated roots and validating every root.
|
||||
|
||||
**Final focused review:** PASS. Deterministic audit validated all task repository roots with zero missing paths; no planning placeholders remained; security prerequisites still gate Tess exposure; observability traceability is explicit.
|
||||
|
||||
**Current gate:** planning PR must merge to `main` with terminal-green CI before any source-code worker starts.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user