docs(ri-050): bootstrap release-integrity workstream for 0.0.50 (#1275)
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline failed
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline failed
- PRD section: normative requirements RI-N1..RI-N5 (decisions SDLC-D-034..038) - docs/release-integrity/TASKS.md: 10-card DAG, pi-glm-5.3 execution note - scratchpad: mode, constraints, budget Executed by jarvis (dragon-lin) with local pi workers per Jason's directive.
This commit is contained in:
+35
@@ -1368,3 +1368,38 @@ All work is **alpha** (< 0.1.0) until Jason approves 0.1.0 beta release.
|
||||
10. ASSUMPTION: **Conversations and messages get their own PG tables** (not stored in brain's entity model). They follow a chat-specific schema with proper foreign keys to users and projects. Rationale: Chat has different access patterns (streaming, pagination, search) than brain entities.
|
||||
|
||||
11. RESOLVED: **Pi handles all target LLM providers natively.** Anthropic, OpenAI/Codex, Z.ai, Ollama, LM Studio, and llama.cpp are all supported via Pi's built-in providers or `models.json` configuration with `openai-completions` API type. No custom provider adapters needed in @mosaicstack/agent — only configuration management.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Release Integrity Workstream (RI, #1275)
|
||||
|
||||
### Problem and objective
|
||||
|
||||
At `next` 476db12b (review of 2026-08-17), publication from `next` is not bound to the full verification pipeline for the same commit: the publish pipeline's publish steps depend on `build` only, while ordinary push CI excludes `next`. Public Forge/MACP paths contain false-success placeholders: a stub executor that reports `completed` with exit zero, planning/remediation gates that execute literal `true`, a review gate that echoes an approving verdict, and a gate runner that treats empty commands and unimplemented CI-provider gates as passing. Shipping UI surfaces can render a failed fetch as an empty, healthy collection.
|
||||
|
||||
Objective: for alpha 0.0.50, the release cannot publish, report, or display work state that the repository has not actually verified. Decisions SDLC-D-033 through SDLC-D-038 (Jason, 2026-08-17) scope this floor; full decision text and required-behavior lists live in jarvis-brain `docs/plans/2026-08-16_mosaic-stack-sdlc-protocol.md` and `data/decisions/mosaic-stack-sdlc-protocol.json`. This section restates only the normative requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
### Normative requirements
|
||||
|
||||
1. **RI-N1 Exact-commit publication verification (SDLC-D-034).** One canonical terminal verification command performs self-contained re-verification in the publish pipeline against the job's checked-out commit before any external publication effect. The command contains or invokes the complete mandatory verification set (semantic parity with the PR merge gate, including sanitization, upgrade-guard, typecheck, lint, format check, tests, and build); CI and publication do not maintain separate semantic checklists. Every publish step depends on the verification step in the executable pipeline DAG. Provider commit identity and `git rev-parse HEAD` must identify the same commit. Missing, skipped, cancelled, stale, or inconclusive checks fail closed. Documentation-only runs may skip publication but cannot bypass verification when a publication effect will occur. A negative control must prove that a broken check blocks every publish step.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **RI-N2 Fail-closed Forge/MACP with explicit simulation (SDLC-D-035).** Simulation requires explicit caller intent (e.g. `--simulate`) and produces a distinct typed `simulated` state that can never satisfy dependencies, acceptance criteria, gates, merge, or release. Normal execution exits nonzero with a typed capability failure when a required executor, reviewer, command, or CI provider is absent — no stub completion, no literal-`true` gates, no synthetic approvals, no empty-command passes. A manual gate with no automation enters a waiting state; it does not pass. Positive tests prove explicit simulation still works; negative controls prove simulation and every missing-provider case cannot advance lifecycle state.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **RI-N3 One transitional PRD authority (SDLC-D-036).** `@mosaicstack/prdy` structured storage under `docs/prdy/`, driven by `mosaic mission --plan`, is the authoritative PRD representation for the alpha. `mosaic prdy` either routes through the same application service or operates only as an explicit, named Markdown import/export adapter; `docs/PRD.md` is not a peer authority. `mission --plan` must persist the mission↔PRD linkage (mission id/version, PRD id/version, selected requirements). Markdown output is a generated view carrying source identity; editing it cannot mutate authority silently. Import is explicit, validated, and conflict-aware (proposed successor, never overwrite). Structural validity is separate from approval.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **RI-N4 One quality-rails evaluator (SDLC-D-037).** The TypeScript quality-rails package is the sole authoritative evaluator. A complete probe inventory maps every current TypeScript and shell check to one canonical check with disposition (preserve/strengthen/retire, each named). Effective shell enforcement probes are absorbed before their independent paths retire; expected-file presence alone is not parity. The evaluator returns typed results (`passed`/`failed`/`blocked`/`error`/`not-applicable`) with check version, subject, and reason; missing implementation, missing input, unknown check, process error, timeout, or malformed output can never become `passed` or an unqualified skip. Check definitions and policy are versioned and digested. Shell commands become thin adapters with no separate verdict logic. The canonical terminal verification command (RI-N1) invokes this evaluator rather than duplicating its logic. Contract, parity, and negative-control tests are required, plus independent review of probe equivalence.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **RI-N5 Consequence-aware stale UI (SDLC-D-038).** Mission Control distinguishes typed freshness states (`current`, `stale`, `partial`, `unknown`, `unavailable`) rather than inferring from empty arrays or null. A failed fetch never renders as an empty healthy collection. Last-known data may display for situational awareness only with source identity, version, and age visibly labeled; any derived completion/assurance/release verdict whose inputs are stale becomes `unknown`; all state-changing actions are disabled until fresh state loads and is revalidated. With no verified snapshot, surfaces show an explicit unavailable state. Cache corruption, cross-workspace data, schema mismatch, and version regression invalidate the snapshot. Tests cover the failure matrix (network, auth, malformed, partial, corruption, stale age, schema mismatch, recovery, stale-action rejection) with negative controls proving no case yields a current green verdict or enabled mutation.
|
||||
|
||||
### Acceptance criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- AC-RI-1: A push to `next` that fails any mandatory verification step publishes nothing (no npm package, no image), demonstrated by a checked-in negative control and by pipeline evidence on a real `next` publish run where the verification step is green and every publish step depends on it.
|
||||
- AC-RI-2: With no executor/reviewer/CI provider wired, Forge and MACP normal runs exit nonzero with typed capability failures; with `--simulate`, runs complete but every result is typed `simulated` and cannot satisfy any gate, dependency, or completion state — proven by unit tests including negative controls.
|
||||
- AC-RI-3: A PRD created or revised through either `mosaic mission --plan` or `mosaic prdy` resolves to one authority under `docs/prdy/` with stable identities and versions; the mission↔PRD linkage survives restart; a Markdown export is labeled as generated and cannot silently become a second writer; divergent legacy content blocks baseline claims until explicitly resolved — proven by contract tests.
|
||||
- AC-RI-4: `quality-rails check` through any entry point (TS CLI, framework shell adapter) returns the same typed verdict for the same subject; the probe inventory names every legacy check's disposition; a deliberately broken probe fails closed — proven by contract/parity/negative-control tests and independent review of probe equivalence.
|
||||
- AC-RI-5: No shipping surface renders a failed fetch as an empty healthy state; stale/partial/unavailable states are typed, labeled, and mutation-disabled — proven by the failure-matrix tests.
|
||||
- AC-RI-6: All cards merged to `next` via squash PR with terminal-green CI; release evidence for 0.0.50 records commit, verification run, and published artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
### Out of scope
|
||||
|
||||
The canonical dispatcher/control-plane vertical slice (work graph, execution attempts, fenced leases, typed check-in, independent verifier dispatch) is decided post-alpha (SDLC-D-033, option B). Multi-pipeline verification certificates (SDLC-D-034 option B) are post-alpha. Full AF-1..AF-4 objective matrices and Mission Control portfolio surfaces are post-alpha.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user