docs: size question records the collected notices for the 14 extra packages and the W3C form left for an owner decision (gyro-0019, gladstone-0027); doc only

This commit is contained in:
jason.woltje committed 2026-10-24 02:16:26 -05:00
1 parent 1bd214e382
commit 76f84465fd
1 file changed
+8 -1
+8 -1
View File
@@ -115,8 +115,15 @@ on refactor. Gyro's packet: gyro/row310 tip 1716f5a22, `agents/gyro/work/queue-3
- winit also carries four example PNGs (under 3 KB each) and a Web Worker path. Neither is in the
measured build's closure, but the binary inventory must list the PNGs and the Worker source isn't
cleared for runtime use.
- Notice follow-up (gyro-0019 at 9522d2356, Gladstone's recheck gladstone-0027, 06:44Z): the four gaps
are now collected as evidence. The W3C terms for cursor-icon and winit are in the notice bundle with
their source hashes, both dpi texts and the libm headers stay, spirv maps WordCraft's pinned
LICENSE-APACHE text explicitly, and winit's four PNGs are inventoried. Gladstone found no further
gaps. What stays open is policy: the W3C form isn't among S0's accepted licenses, and the PNGs and
the Worker source need explicit classification if adopted.
- What adopting it would mean: commit a cargo-pruned lock in place of WordCraft's (a packaging change
for S0's reviewer), the 14 packages' source, and the four notice fixes.
for S0's reviewer), the 14 packages' source, the collected notices, and an owner decision on the W3C
license form.
## What Jason is asked