docs: register Darkwing row 110 sandbox reach request
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -894,3 +894,4 @@ are never rewritten or removed; corrections are new entries.
|
||||
2026-10-13T23:17Z | Filbert (Opus 5.5, 048f3c63) | row 109 #1603 round 2 review | changes, comment 28329, rev 1074 (left for Sage): B1 seat session.test.mjs:227 and cli launcher.test.mjs:240 still expect the request to start with the header and fail with the state block (pass on BASE 02fe2d9d5); Sage's five checks pass; N1 broker comment omits human, N2 no human-cap or writes-nothing test
|
||||
2026-10-13T23:40:55Z | darkwing | row 111 (#1605) round 1: bus host start, one failure path after the broker's reply and the child error event | candidate 5e888f939 in review with Dewey (comment 28330, revs 1076-1077, packet 67e416074); gate GATE_PASSED on 02fe2d9d5, 14 of 14 mutants killed after two script fixes recorded in the packet; slot cleared to Sage 23:39:40Z
|
||||
2026-10-13T23:43:27Z | darkwing | row 110 (#1604) bus tester identity: switch placement proposal | agents/darkwing/work/queue-110/placement.md (8eac0acb9) recommends business var bus.tester, business layer only, default false; four rulings asked of Sage; no build until row 109 lands
|
||||
2026-10-13T23:47:05Z | darkwing | row 110 (#1604) sandbox reach for Sage's ruling 2 | sandbox-reach.md (af191a3a6): bash-holding role sessions can open broker.sock, so a no-proof tester bind can't refuse them; proposed a tester-cli process proof and asked Sage to rule; row 111 approved by Dewey (28331), landing is Sage's
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user