merge: absorb main into next — 23-commit divergence (08-05..13 base=main window)
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline failed

17 content commits + 3 merge bubbles were genuinely missing from next (~8,000 lines:
goal controller #1152, framework enforcement #1174/#1195, pr-edit wrapper #1173/#1200,
pipefail series #1100/#1105/#1106/#1107, git-tools fixes #1073/#1085/#1086/#1089,
#991, #1007, enrollment tolerance #1094). 3 commits were already in next by content
(#1060 identical, #1066/#1062 evolved twins — conflicts resolved to next's side).

Per-commit classification and evidence: mosaic-brain fleet/lanes/stack-remediation/main-next-divergence.md.
Conflict resolutions (6 files) itemized in the PR body.
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-19 16:27:17 -05:00
105 changed files with 7967 additions and 208 deletions
@@ -245,9 +245,21 @@ describe('EnrollmentService.createToken', () => {
const after = Date.now();
const expiresMs = new Date(result.expiresAt).getTime();
// Should be at most 900s from now
expect(expiresMs - before).toBeLessThanOrEqual(900_000 + 100);
// The property under test is CLAMPING: a 9999s request must come back as 900s.
// The gap between clamped and unclamped is 9_099_000 ms, so the tolerance below
// only has to exceed CI scheduling jitter — it does not need to be tight to keep
// the assertion discriminating. A 5s allowance consumes 0.05% of that margin and
// an unclamped result still misses by three orders of magnitude.
//
// It was 100ms and failed on a loaded agent at 900_106 — 6ms over (#1090). A
// wall-clock budget sized to a fast machine is a flake, not a tighter test.
const CI_JITTER_MS = 5_000;
expect(expiresMs - before).toBeLessThanOrEqual(900_000 + CI_JITTER_MS);
expect(expiresMs - after).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
// Explicitly pin the clamp itself, independent of any timing allowance:
// unclamped (9999s) would exceed this by ~9_099_000 ms.
expect(expiresMs - before).toBeLessThan(1_000_000);
});
});