plans: row 139 records Q169 as PRD 1.6 and leaves assistant-run execution to row 155

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

docs/plans/2026-10-15_q167-rows-r3.md

@@ -439,8 +439,10 @@ Jason on 2026-10-15.
 - `roles/*.json`, grants only as the PRD 1.5 text requires
 - tests in the bus and business packages, and READMEs; in
   `scripts/test-land-work.sh`, only the arbiter-resolved `not-human` case
-- `docs/prd/mosaic-stack.md`, only the note under REQ-WAIT-1 for Jason's
-  Q169 ruling below
+- `docs/prd/mosaic-stack.md`, only a version 1.6 for Jason's Q169 ruling
+  below: the status line, a version 1.6 source quoting Q169, and the
+  REQ-ROLE-2, REQ-ROLE-4 and REQ-WAIT-1 text it changes. The PRD is never
+  edited in place (Dewey, round 2, finding 3).
 
 ### What ships
 
@@ -473,18 +475,24 @@ Jason on 2026-10-15.
     (`broker.mjs`) goes through only when the chief of staff acts, or
     when the caller cites a decision the human resolved through the CLI;
   - the chief of staff's `role.end` of the assistant, with a reason,
-    succeeds. Ending the caller's own run stays refused;
+    passes this check. Ending the caller's own run stays refused. The
+    end can't yet stop an assistant run, because those runs hold thread
+    claims and the end path reads role claims (Dewey, round 2, finding
+    2); row 155 (#1649) fixes that;
   - any other role's revoke of the assistant is refused, and that
     includes a cited raise an arbiter resolved. A raise for it routes to
     the human even when it cites the current spec, never to an arbiter;
   - every other cited revoke routes as REQ-DEC-2 says;
-  - the PRD notes this under REQ-WAIT-1 as Jason's ruling Q169.
-  Reconfiguring the assistant's definition and seat name is a separate
-  row, not this one.
-- Tests for Q169: the chief of staff's end of the assistant succeeds;
+  - PRD version 1.6 records all of Q169 as Jason's ruling, never as
+    Mos's or Sage's, including the configuration half that row 155
+    builds.
+  Reconfiguring the assistant's definition and seat name is row 155
+  (#1649), not this one.
+- Tests for Q169: the chief of staff's end of the assistant is not
+  refused with `role-end-refused`;
   another role's cited revoke of the assistant, resolved by an arbiter,
   is refused; a revoke of the assistant citing a human-resolved decision
-  still succeeds; a cited revoke of a role not in `END_PROTECTED` still
+  is not refused by the protection either; a cited revoke of a role not in `END_PROTECTED` still
   goes to the arbiter.
 - Whichever of 137 and 139 lands second makes the host land op accept an
   arbiter-resolved merge decision, as row 137's brief says. Row 139 always