This commit is contained in:
@@ -34,12 +34,10 @@ A gate with an external installed counterpart declares it explicitly. When the i
|
||||
|
||||
## Current-tree and history-provenance boundary
|
||||
|
||||
**DOES:** Every PR evaluates the current checkout's registered gates and declared inerting mutations directly, unprivileged and fail-closed. The seven-gate population is compared independently against `gates/required-gates.baseline.json`; a registered control shrinks the verifier inventory and manifest together and proves that the unchanged baseline rejects the attack. Evidence-side subjects are consumed and compared with gate definitions for every gate.
|
||||
**DOES:** Every PR evaluates the current checkout's registered gates and declared inerting mutations directly, unprivileged and fail-closed. The seven-gate population, verifier inventory, and `gates/required-gates.baseline.json` are compared inside the checkout. Evidence-side subjects are consumed and compared with gate definitions for every gate. **Detects accidental and incompetent inventory drift within a checkout; does NOT survive an adversary who rewrites baseline, manifest, and verifier consistently — that guarantee requires RM-60's external boundary.**
|
||||
|
||||
**DOES NOT:** This repository layer establishes history provenance at all. `pnpm install` executes PR-controlled lifecycle code before `gate:verify`, so no local ref, git config, remote URL, constant, or author-positioned path in the checkout can anchor a history claim. An observation saying “unverifiable” while returning zero would be a green wearing a disclaimer, so the claim and history verifier path are removed.
|
||||
|
||||
The production output path uses a closed current-tree observation renderer; history, ancestry, and provider-lineage success are not representable observation classes. `scripts/gate-history-exclusion-control.mjs` exercises alternate success wording and production renderer wiring. Its registered must-fail case turns red if a prohibited success class is added or renderer consumption is bypassed. RM-60 owns the provider-controlled/protected pre-execution boundary needed before history provenance can be asserted. No bootstrap override exists in RM-02.
|
||||
|
||||
Universal checks first prove populations non-empty. The production profile reads the independent baseline before comparing the verifier inventory and manifest separately, while `gateRefs` on the D-38/D-40 criteria must exactly span every registered gate. Population controls mutate evidence-side subjects and type-strict comparison inputs one gate at a time and require rejection across the complete inventory.
|
||||
|
||||
The independent baseline blocks the registered source-plus-manifest shrink attack. It does not claim same-authority authenticity against an actor who consistently rewrites every repository artifact; RM-60/RM-59 own external execution/artifact integrity.
|
||||
Universal checks first prove populations non-empty. The production profile reads the same-checkout baseline before comparing the verifier inventory and manifest separately, while `gateRefs` on the D-38/D-40 criteria must exactly span every registered gate. Population controls mutate evidence-side subjects and type-strict comparison inputs one gate at a time and require rejection across the complete inventory. A registered prose-claim control fails when the same-checkout mechanism is described as an adversarial protection.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user