mosaicstack/stack
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues 179 Pull Requests 12 Actions Packages Projects Releases 15 Wiki Activity

style(framework): apply prettier to WRITING-STYLE.md so CI format passes (#965)
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
Details

Browse Source 
The `format` step of .woodpecker/ci.yml:89 (`pnpm format:check`) failed on
pipeline 2111 for this branch. Reproduced on a bench with the lockfile-pinned
[email protected] against the repo .prettierrc and .prettierignore, using CI's
exact glob: WRITING-STYLE.md was the only failing file.

The change is mechanical and semantically null: markdown table cell padding
and `*emphasis*` -> `_emphasis_`. Verified by normalizing both revisions
(whitespace removed, `_`/`*` folded, table rules collapsed) — the results are
byte-identical.

This does not address the prose findings published on #965 (P1-P4); those
await a ruling. The `test` step also failed on 2111, on a base ~40 commits
stale — attribution for that failure needs this rerun, and is not claimed here.

Co-authored-by: mos-dt-0 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Jason Woltje
2026-07-31 09:22:15 -05:00
co-authored by mos-dt-0
parent 89e26ff7c2
commit ed477aa72f
1 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
packages/mosaic/framework/guides/WRITING-STYLE.md
+3 -3
View File
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ certification.
## Scope — which standard governs which output ## Scope — which standard governs which output
| Output type | Standard | | Output type | Standard |
|---|---| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Technical documentation (READMEs, runbooks, PRDs, procedures, ADRs, guides, acceptance criteria, design docs) | **MOS-STE** (this guide) | | Technical documentation (READMEs, runbooks, PRDs, procedures, ADRs, guides, acceptance criteria, design docs) | **MOS-STE** (this guide) |
| Source code and code comments | **Google Style Guide** for the language (§4) | | Source code and code comments | **Google Style Guide** for the language (§4) |
| Inter-agent comms | MOS-STE by default (concise, structured) | | Inter-agent comms | MOS-STE by default (concise, structured) |
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ concepts in one predicate, the check can test the wrong concept and still pass.
**Worked failure.** A rename used a witness predicate with three clauses: ref A **Worked failure.** A rename used a witness predicate with three clauses: ref A
present, ref B absent, tip committed from this host. Every clause tested the git present, ref B absent, tip committed from this host. Every clause tested the git
*ref* (the channel). The claim under test was about a *field inside the payload*. _ref_ (the channel). The claim under test was about a _field inside the payload_.
The word "beacon" named two concepts in one sentence. Deleting ref B was the next The word "beacon" named two concepts in one sentence. Deleting ref B was the next
scheduled step. That step flips the last clause green and certifies a state in scheduled step. That step flips the last clause green and certifies a state in
which the payload still names the wrong host. The predicate was one planned action which the payload still names the wrong host. The predicate was one planned action
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ The builder renders the style as prose bullets, not the token name, so match on
the leading bullet the generated `USER.md` actually contains: the leading bullet the generated `USER.md` actually contains:
| `USER.md` leading bullet | Style | User-facing output | | `USER.md` leading bullet | Style | User-facing output |
|---|---|---| | ----------------------------- | ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| "Direct and concise" | `direct` (default) | MOS-STE structure — short, active, defined terms, tables for overview. | | "Direct and concise" | `direct` (default) | MOS-STE structure — short, active, defined terms, tables for overview. |
| "Warm and conversational" | `friendly` | Warmer register. Full sentences, explain reasoning, fewer tables. | | "Warm and conversational" | `friendly` | Warmer register. Full sentences, explain reasoning, fewer tables. |
| "Professional and structured" | `formal` | Professional and structured. Thorough, with explicit recommendations. | | "Professional and structured" | `formal` | Professional and structured. Thorough, with explicit recommendations. |