feat(tools/git): explain tea's misleading user does not exist error (stale token, not a missing account) (#1086)
ci/woodpecker/push/publish Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful

This commit was merged in pull request #1086.
This commit is contained in:
Mos
2026-08-07 05:07:40 +00:00
parent 8ff7aac0ca
commit f744f32214
6 changed files with 83 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -246,6 +246,21 @@ PY
} >&2
}
# Explain tea's most misleading failure. `user does not exist [uid: 0, name: ]` reads
# as a missing account; it almost always means a REVOKED OR STALE TOKEN. `tea login`
# keeps its OWN COPY of the token, so rotating the credential store does not update it.
# Diagnostic only -- stderr, no control flow, no exit.
explain_tea_user_does_not_exist() {
cat >&2 <<'MSG'
NOTE: `user does not exist [uid: 0, name: ]` from tea usually means a REVOKED OR STALE TOKEN,
not a missing account. A `tea login` stores its OWN COPY of the token; rotating the
credential store does NOT update it.
CHECK: the login's cached copy (`tea login list` -- read the FULL table, never `| head`),
then re-register that login against the current token.
DO NOT probe capability with a mutating request; a POST is the action, not a check.
MSG
}
get_gitea_login_for_host() {
local host="${1:-}"
local login
@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ case "$PLATFORM" in
exit 0
fi
echo "Warning: tea issue create failed, trying Gitea API fallback..." >&2
{ declare -F explain_tea_user_does_not_exist >/dev/null && explain_tea_user_does_not_exist; } || true
fi
gitea_issue_create_api
;;
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ elif [[ "$PLATFORM" == "gitea" ]]; then
exit 0
fi
echo "Warning: tea issue view failed, trying Gitea API fallback..." >&2
{ declare -F explain_tea_user_does_not_exist >/dev/null && explain_tea_user_does_not_exist; } || true
fi
gitea_issue_view_api
else
@@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ case "$PLATFORM" in
exit 0
fi
echo "Warning: tea pr create failed, trying Gitea API fallback..." >&2
{ declare -F explain_tea_user_does_not_exist >/dev/null && explain_tea_user_does_not_exist; } || true
gitea_pr_create_api
;;
*)
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
#!/bin/bash
# Regression: the tea-failure diagnostic must be STATUS-NEUTRAL.
#
# Found by be-coder-08 reviewing PR #1086. At all three call sites the diagnostic is emitted
# immediately BEFORE the Gitea API fallback. Written as the last command of an && list:
# declare -F explain_... >/dev/null && explain_...
# under `set -e` a FAILING diagnostic exits and the fallback never runs -- a diagnostic that
# suppresses the recovery path it exists to explain. It misbehaves ONLY when the helper is
# PRESENT, so the helper-absent path (pre-#1086 behaviour) keeps working and reads as a
# passing control.
#
# TWO DEFECTS IN THE FIRST VERSION OF THIS TEST, both found by be-coder-08:
# 1. `out=$( ... ) 2>"$errto"` applies the redirection to the ASSIGNMENT, not to the
# command substitution, so the probe's stderr was never actually pointed at /dev/full
# and the /dev/full rows proved nothing. Verified: `out=$(echo x >&2) 2>/dev/full`
# leaks to the terminal and returns 0; the redirect must be INSIDE the substitution.
# 2. `eval "$CONSTRUCT"` changes `set -e` semantics for a bare && list, so the probe did
# not exercise the construct as the shipped file executes it. It now writes the line
# into a real script and runs it -- same parse, same set -e rules, no eval.
# The construct is still LIFTED FROM THE SHIPPED FILE: retyping the fixed form makes the
# probe pass on a build whose real call sites still carry the bare && form.
set -uo pipefail
fail=0
GIT_DIR_UNDER_TEST="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
TMP="$(mktemp -d)"; trap 'rm -rf "$TMP"' EXIT
probe() { # $1=present|absent $2=stderr target $3=source file -> "rc:fallback"
local helper="$1" errto="$2" src="$3" construct script out rc
construct=$(grep -m1 'explain_tea_user_does_not_exist' "$GIT_DIR_UNDER_TEST/$src" | sed 's/^[[:space:]]*//')
[ -n "$construct" ] || { printf 'no-construct:no'; return; }
script="$TMP/probe.sh"
{
echo '#!/bin/bash'
echo 'set -e'
echo 'explain_tea_user_does_not_exist() { echo "diagnostic" >&2; }'
[ "$helper" = absent ] && echo 'unset -f explain_tea_user_does_not_exist'
echo "$construct" # the shipped line, parsed by a real shell
echo 'echo FALLBACK_REACHED'
} > "$script"
# redirect INSIDE the substitution so the subshell's stderr really is $errto
out=$( bash "$script" 2>"$errto" ); rc=$?
printf '%s:%s' "$rc" "$(grep -q FALLBACK_REACHED <<<"$out" && echo yes || echo no)"
}
check() { if [ "$2" = "$3" ]; then echo " PASS $1 ($2)"; else echo " FAIL $1: got $2, want $3"; fail=1; fi; }
echo "== diagnostic must not alter exit status or skip the fallback =="
# /dev/full makes every stderr write fail -- the real-world shape is a closed or full fd.
for src in pr-create.sh issue-view.sh issue-create.sh; do
check "$src stderr OK / helper present" "$(probe present /dev/null "$src")" "0:yes"
check "$src stderr OK / helper absent " "$(probe absent /dev/null "$src")" "0:yes"
check "$src stderr FAILING / helper present" "$(probe present /dev/full "$src")" "0:yes"
check "$src stderr FAILING / helper absent " "$(probe absent /dev/full "$src")" "0:yes"
done
echo "== all three call sites use the status-neutral form =="
for f in pr-create.sh issue-view.sh issue-create.sh; do
p="$GIT_DIR_UNDER_TEST/$f"
grep -q '{ declare -F explain_tea_user_does_not_exist >/dev/null && explain_tea_user_does_not_exist; } || true' "$p" \
&& echo " PASS $f guarded" || { echo " FAIL $f: diagnostic is not status-neutral"; fail=1; }
done
[ "$fail" -eq 0 ] && echo "OK diagnostic is status-neutral" || echo "FAILED"
exit "$fail"