Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Jason WoltjeandClaude Opus 5 cb2bf4e4a4 installer: provision Node instead of refusing to run without it
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline is pending approval
The installer's promise is that one command turns a bare host into a working
one, but Node was carved out of that: it was checked as a prerequisite and the
run died on a greenfield host. That made the documented one-command install a
two-command install whose first command always failed.

It now installs a user-local Node under ~/.mosaic/node when the system Node is
missing or too old, from the official nodejs.org tarballs, verified against
SHASUMS256.txt. User-local rather than apt/dnf/brew: no root, one code path on
every distro, and it works on an immutable host. A system Node that is already
new enough is preferred and left untouched. --no-node-install (or
MOSAIC_NO_NODE_INSTALL=1) keeps the old refuse-and-explain behaviour, and
neither --check nor --uninstall provisions anything.

PATH now lands in the login profile as well as the interactive rc. Writing only
~/.bashrc looked right interactively and was invisible to every way an agent
seat actually starts -- bash -lc, ssh host cmd, a systemd unit -- because
Debian's .bashrc returns early when non-interactive.

Verified end to end on mosaic-sbx-dev rolled back to its greenfield snapshot:
red on origin/next (rc=1, "Required command not found: node"), green with this
change (Node v22.23.2 fetched and verified, CLI 0.0.50-next.2413 installed), and
a fresh `bash -lc` finds both. tools/install-node-provisioning.test.sh pins the
behaviour offline against a file:// dist fixture, including the refusals and the
checksum gate.

The next-lane test's Node 20 case moves to --no-node-install: the >= 22 gate must
still fire before anything is installed, but refusing is no longer the outcome
when provisioning is allowed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WYgWocp36goy8hj2ui6ps1
2026-08-15 12:44:39 -05:00
Jason Woltje baf4306f51 fix(installer): require Node 22 for next lane
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
2026-08-09 02:37:03 -05:00
jason.woltjeandClaude Opus 4.8 940ae3cc41 feat(installer): prefer npm next lane (#688)
ci/woodpecker/push/ci Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/push/publish Pipeline was successful
--next now prefers a fast npm @next install (CLI + gateway from the Gitea registry) and falls back to source build at next if the dist-tag is unavailable. Registry lane gated to non-dev, non-explicit-ref next installs; CLI/gateway prerelease versions must share a pipeline suffix. Adds tools/install-next-lane.test.sh (wired into CI). PR-event CI 1635 fully green + review-of-record APPROVE (functional install test, head 2fd7cfc3).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
2026-06-25 07:14:24 +00:00