RM-61: prove ci-postgres teardown discrimination #1033
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: mosaicstack/stack#1033
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
RM-61 implements the named, signature-scoped CI-contract exemption for issue #1000.
The negative controls ran before adoption:
The current head contains no failure injection. The temporary .woodpecker control edits are absent from the final tree.
The verifier consumes the full JSON/API child-step record, requires exact binding to the current full PR-head commit, and permits only WP-K8S-1000-CI-POSTGRES-TEARDOWN. Any near miss or independent failure blocks. It performs no retry or re-trigger.
The exemption retires when #1000 is fixed; #1000 remains the tracked provider-seam closure.
Refs #1000
Closes #1034
VERDICT: REQUEST CHANGES — NO GO — bound to
e7b29219e1.[BLOCKER]
packages/mosaic/framework/tools/woodpecker/verify-terminal-green.py:158-159— the verifier reports the pipeline record's commit but never binds it to an expected PR-head SHA. The merge-gate instruction likewise requires a full JSON scan but does not require the scanned pipeline commit to equal the PR head. I changed only #2188'scommitfield to an unrelated 40-hex value; the verifier still exited 0 withexempted_steps=1. Therefore an older artifact pipeline can satisfy the detailed gate whilepr-ci-wait.shis evaluating a different head. Require an expected commit argument, fail on missing/mismatched commit, wire the merge gate to pass the current PR head, and add match/missing/mismatch tests.Acceptance evidence (independent full JSON/API reads, including
clone):WP-K8S-1000-CI-POSTGRES-TEARDOWN;exempted_steps=1; workflowcisuccess; 10 children = 9 success + 1 failure. (The supplied 11 count includes the workflow row;workflows[0].childrenitself is 10.)exempted_steps=0; workflow failure; 9 children = 7 success + 2 failure;ci-postgresexit 1 andtestexit 1. #2191 -> exit 1,exempted_steps=0; workflow failure; 9 children = 7 success + 2 failure;ci-postgresexit 137 andtestexit 61. (Including each workflow row gives the supplied count of 10.)ef9d23abbefore1a6fc996); at the test commit,bash test-terminal-green-contract.shexited 1 because the verifier did not exist. Direct execution also failed (126) because executable modes were installed only ate7b29219.pipeline-status.sh -f json, not default text.Focused verification: terminal-green harness 9/9 PASS; Python compile PASS;
git diff --checkPASS; committed modes are 100755. The known unrelatedtest:framework-shellBash 5.2.15 wake failure was not treated as evidence.The signature conjunction itself is narrow and the two real PostgreSQL controls remain red. The blocker is subject binding: the gate can currently certify the right record for the wrong commit.
VERDICT: REQUEST CHANGES — NO GO — bound to
e7b29219e1.[BLOCKER]
packages/mosaic/framework/tools/woodpecker/verify-terminal-green.py:158-159— the verifier reports the pipeline record's commit but never binds it to an expected PR-head SHA. The merge-gate instruction likewise requires a full JSON scan but does not require the scanned pipeline commit to equal the PR head. I changed only #2188'scommitfield to an unrelated 40-hex value; the verifier still exited 0 withexempted_steps=1. Therefore an older artifact pipeline can satisfy the detailed gate whilepr-ci-wait.shis evaluating a different head. Require an expected commit argument, fail on missing/mismatched commit, wire the merge gate to pass the current PR head, and add match/missing/mismatch tests.Acceptance evidence (independent full JSON/API reads, including
clone):WP-K8S-1000-CI-POSTGRES-TEARDOWN;exempted_steps=1; workflowcisuccess; 10 children = 9 success + 1 failure. (The supplied 11 count includes the workflow row;workflows[0].childrenitself is 10.)exempted_steps=0; workflow failure; 9 children = 7 success + 2 failure;ci-postgresexit 1 andtestexit 1. #2191 -> exit 1,exempted_steps=0; workflow failure; 9 children = 7 success + 2 failure;ci-postgresexit 137 andtestexit 61. (Including each workflow row gives the supplied count of 10.)ef9d23abbefore1a6fc996); at the test commit,bash test-terminal-green-contract.shexited 1 because the verifier did not exist. Direct execution also failed (126) because executable modes were installed only ate7b29219.pipeline-status.sh -f json, not default text.Focused verification: terminal-green harness 9/9 PASS; Python compile PASS;
git diff --checkPASS; committed modes are 100755. The known unrelatedtest:framework-shellBash 5.2.15 wake failure was not treated as evidence.The signature conjunction itself is narrow and the two real PostgreSQL controls remain red. The blocker is subject binding: the gate can currently certify the right record for the wrong commit.
VERDICT: REQUEST CHANGES — NO GO — bound to
033b2ffb46.The commit-binding code remediation passes. The PR is still not gate-ready because its live provider description contradicts the reviewed head.
[BLOCKER] PR description (live provider metadata): it still says, “Current head intentionally injects a real PostgreSQL startup failure. DO NOT MERGE” and “The exemption will not be implemented.” Neither statement describes
033b2ffb: the control injection is absent from the final delta and the exemption is implemented. A merge gate must not ignore an explicit DO NOT MERGE instruction, and stale metadata gives the next reviewer the wrong subject. Update the PR description to describe the bounded exemption, its #1000 retirement, and the now-terminal control sequence. This is metadata-only; no code change is requested by this finding.Pre-registered evidence from
docs/remediation/AC-RM61-REREVIEW-033b2ffb.md:terminal-green contract harness: PASS (12 cases).committobbbb…bbbb, verification against the truef9746b23…7293exited 1, reportedexempted_steps=0, and emittedpipeline commit does not equal the expected PR headwith both expected and actual values.--expect-commitexited 2 through required-argument rejection.f9746b23), non-hex (40zcharacters), and empty expected commits each exited 2; none normalized into a verdict.commitexited 1, reportedexempted_steps=0, and emitted expected commit plusactual_commit=null.f9746b23c88f8f9edb7170368dfc73a88dad7293exited 0 with exactly oneWP-K8S-1000-CI-POSTGRES-TEARDOWN,exempted_steps=1, and no anomalies.e7b29219verifier. Correctly-bound invocation returned old usage exit 2 instead of expected 0; omitted expected commit returned 0 instead of expected 2; mismatched expected invocation returned 2 instead of expected 1; missing-record-commit invocation returned 2 instead of expected 1. The original old-interface attack itself returned 0 withexempted_steps=1, proving the prior defect rather than merely observing unsupported syntax.exempted_steps=0(ci-postgresexit 1,testexit 1); #2191 exited 1 withexempted_steps=0(ci-postgresexit 137,testexit 61).merge-gate.md:16-20requires full JSON includingclone,--expect-commit <current-provider-PR-head>, equal expected/observed full-40 commits, and hard refusal on missing/mismatch.CI-CD-PIPELINES.md:873-885saysPR_HEADMUST come from current provider metadata and shows the mandatory argument.woodpecker/README.md:64-67includes the required argument in the operator command.POD_NOT_FOUNDoris_issue_1000_artifact; the conjunction remains nameci-postgres, typeservice, statefailure, exit 0, exact ULID-shaped pod-not-found signature. #1000 tracking and “MUST be removed when #1000 is fixed” remain atCI-CD-PIPELINES.md:901.not-terminal-green,exempted_steps=0, and emitted both values. The asymmetry cannot create a false exemption; it can create a false block if a provider ever emits uppercase. Non-blocking boundary note: normalize and validate both sides if provider casing changes—do not weaken to a partial/fuzzy comparison. Conversely, an uppercase expected SHA is validated then normalized and correctly passes against the lowercase provider record.Full JSON/API counts (
pipeline-status.sh -f json, includingclone):033b2ffb…f62d9exited 0,exempted_steps=0, no anomalies.Outside-set attacks: uppercase expected/lowercase observed passed after expected normalization; leading whitespace expected and extra positional input exited 2; duplicate expected arguments use argparse’s last value, with a wrong last value blocking and a matching last value passing. No false-exemption path was found. Python compile,
git diff --check, and committed executable modes passed. Automated Codex review flagged RR12’s false-block behavior as a blocker; I downgrade it to a bounded non-blocking note because the measured direction is fail-closed, not failure-masking.Identity/integrity: review executed with
MOSAIC_GIT_IDENTITY=rev-974;git var GIT_AUTHOR_IDENTresolvedrev-974 <[email protected]>. I wrote no repository config, source changes, or commits.VERDICT: REQUEST CHANGES — NO GO — bound to
033b2ffb46.The commit-binding code remediation passes. The PR is still not gate-ready because its live provider description contradicts the reviewed head.
[BLOCKER] PR description (live provider metadata): it still says, “Current head intentionally injects a real PostgreSQL startup failure. DO NOT MERGE” and “The exemption will not be implemented.” Neither statement describes
033b2ffb: the control injection is absent from the final delta and the exemption is implemented. A merge gate must not ignore an explicit DO NOT MERGE instruction, and stale metadata gives the next reviewer the wrong subject. Update the PR description to describe the bounded exemption, its #1000 retirement, and the now-terminal control sequence. This is metadata-only; no code change is requested by this finding.Pre-registered evidence from
docs/remediation/AC-RM61-REREVIEW-033b2ffb.md:terminal-green contract harness: PASS (12 cases).committobbbb…bbbb, verification against the truef9746b23…7293exited 1, reportedexempted_steps=0, and emittedpipeline commit does not equal the expected PR headwith both expected and actual values.--expect-commitexited 2 through required-argument rejection.f9746b23), non-hex (40zcharacters), and empty expected commits each exited 2; none normalized into a verdict.commitexited 1, reportedexempted_steps=0, and emitted expected commit plusactual_commit=null.f9746b23c88f8f9edb7170368dfc73a88dad7293exited 0 with exactly oneWP-K8S-1000-CI-POSTGRES-TEARDOWN,exempted_steps=1, and no anomalies.e7b29219verifier. Correctly-bound invocation returned old usage exit 2 instead of expected 0; omitted expected commit returned 0 instead of expected 2; mismatched expected invocation returned 2 instead of expected 1; missing-record-commit invocation returned 2 instead of expected 1. The original old-interface attack itself returned 0 withexempted_steps=1, proving the prior defect rather than merely observing unsupported syntax.exempted_steps=0(ci-postgresexit 1,testexit 1); #2191 exited 1 withexempted_steps=0(ci-postgresexit 137,testexit 61).merge-gate.md:16-20requires full JSON includingclone,--expect-commit <current-provider-PR-head>, equal expected/observed full-40 commits, and hard refusal on missing/mismatch.CI-CD-PIPELINES.md:873-885saysPR_HEADMUST come from current provider metadata and shows the mandatory argument.woodpecker/README.md:64-67includes the required argument in the operator command.POD_NOT_FOUNDoris_issue_1000_artifact; the conjunction remains nameci-postgres, typeservice, statefailure, exit 0, exact ULID-shaped pod-not-found signature. #1000 tracking and “MUST be removed when #1000 is fixed” remain atCI-CD-PIPELINES.md:901.not-terminal-green,exempted_steps=0, and emitted both values. The asymmetry cannot create a false exemption; it can create a false block if a provider ever emits uppercase. Non-blocking boundary note: normalize and validate both sides if provider casing changes—do not weaken to a partial/fuzzy comparison. Conversely, an uppercase expected SHA is validated then normalized and correctly passes against the lowercase provider record.Full JSON/API counts (
pipeline-status.sh -f json, includingclone):033b2ffb…f62d9exited 0,exempted_steps=0, no anomalies.Outside-set attacks: uppercase expected/lowercase observed passed after expected normalization; leading whitespace expected and extra positional input exited 2; duplicate expected arguments use argparse’s last value, with a wrong last value blocking and a matching last value passing. No false-exemption path was found. Python compile,
git diff --check, and committed executable modes passed. Automated Codex review flagged RR12’s false-block behavior as a blocker; I downgrade it to a bounded non-blocking note because the measured direction is fail-closed, not failure-masking.Identity/integrity: review executed with
MOSAIC_GIT_IDENTITY=rev-974;git var GIT_AUTHOR_IDENTresolvedrev-974 <[email protected]>. I wrote no repository config, source changes, or commits.VERDICT: APPROVE — GO FOR MERGE-GATE ASSIGNMENT — bound to unchanged head
033b2ffb46.This is a narrow metadata-blocker discharge. I did not re-run RR1–RR12. Review 68 / comment 20409 remains the evidence record: all twelve checks passed at this same commit. The only remaining blocker in that review was the stale PR description.
Metadata verification:
033b2ffb46674b2c0bcc5197273c109b461f62d9; no code subject moved.pr-metadata.sh. Its observed body SHA-256 isb0198d98238e93ec6970d0a73e055874f23ca09a34cd1d9af9a4333620fc4a9f.Blocker disposition: CLEARED. The prior REQUEST_CHANGES verdict is superseded for this unchanged commit.
RR12 process note: I stand by the non-blocking ruling independently. Before the orchestrator’s framing arrived, I had already measured uppercase observed vs lowercase expected as exit 1,
not-terminal-green, andexempted_steps=0. The severity decision follows that measured direction: it can false-block but cannot false-exempt. The message reinforced the distinction but did not supply the measurement or determine the ruling. Normalizing and validating both sides remains the correct future robustness change; fuzzy/partial comparison would not be.VERDICT: APPROVE — GO FOR MERGE-GATE ASSIGNMENT — bound to unchanged head
033b2ffb46.This is a narrow metadata-blocker discharge. I did not re-run RR1–RR12. Review 68 / comment 20409 remains the evidence record: all twelve checks passed at this same commit. The only remaining blocker in that review was the stale PR description.
Metadata verification:
033b2ffb46674b2c0bcc5197273c109b461f62d9; no code subject moved.pr-metadata.sh. Its observed body SHA-256 isb0198d98238e93ec6970d0a73e055874f23ca09a34cd1d9af9a4333620fc4a9f.Blocker disposition: CLEARED. The prior REQUEST_CHANGES verdict is superseded for this unchanged commit.
RR12 process note: I stand by the non-blocking ruling independently. Before the orchestrator’s framing arrived, I had already measured uppercase observed vs lowercase expected as exit 1,
not-terminal-green, andexempted_steps=0. The severity decision follows that measured direction: it can false-block but cannot false-exempt. The message reinforced the distinction but did not supply the measurement or determine the ruling. Normalizing and validating both sides remains the correct future robustness change; fuzzy/partial comparison would not be.VERDICT: APPROVE — GO FOR MERGE-GATE ASSIGNMENT — bound to
57cae04f2b.No blocking or non-blocking findings.
Evidence against
docs/remediation/AC-RM61-TYPESTRICT.md:exit_codechanged to JSONfalsewrongly passed at old033b2ffb(exit 0,exempted_steps=1) and blocks at57cae04f(exit 1,exempted_steps=0).0.0likewise passed old (0/exempt 1) and blocks new (1/exempt 0)."0"blocked both old and new (exit 1,exempted_steps=0).nullblocked both old and new (exit 1,exempted_steps=0). The addedtruecase is also honestly a regression guard: it blocked both old and new.0, bound tof9746b23c88f8f9edb7170368dfc73a88dad7293, exits 0 withexempted_steps=1and exactly oneWP-K8S-1000-CI-POSTGRES-TEARDOWN.verify-terminal-green.py:45-54reads and type-checks the actualexit_codeinsideis_issue_1000_artifact; lines 144-145 place only that predicate’s matches intocandidates; line 169 requires exactly one candidate and no anomaly forexemption_applies.type(exit_code) is int, explicitly excludebool, then compare to zero. JSONtrueandfalseboth block. Redundancy assessment:not isinstance(exit_code, bool)is behaviorally redundant while exacttype(...) is intremains, but is intentional, requirement-aligned self-documentation rather than a defect. Mutation evidence: deleting the exact-type clause reopens float0.0, and the 17-case harness kills that mutation; deleting only the bool clause leaves behavior unchanged and the harness green because exact type still excludes bool. Thus the exact-type clause is load-bearing; the explicit bool clause is not currently load-bearing, but removing it alone does not reopen D-40. A futuretype(...) is int→isinstance(..., int)change without bool exclusion would be caught by the true/false cases.137remains exit 1 withexempted_steps=0; real #2189 remains red with integer exits 1 forci-postgresandtest.exempted_steps=0; omitted--expect-commitexits 2; absent record commit exits 1 withexempted_steps=0.033b2ffbchanges only strict handling of the existingexit_codeoperand.POD_NOT_FOUND, step name, type, state, exact message, candidate cardinality, and independent-anomaly behavior are unchanged.git diff --check, and committed 100755 modes also pass.The author’s final evidence labels are honest:
falseand0.0are identified as genuine red-first;true,"0", andnullare identified as pre-existing regression guards. There is no claim that all five were observed red-first.Exact-head CI full JSON/API scan: pipeline #2194 is terminal success at exact commit
57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f; workflowcisuccess; 9 children, 9 success, includingclone; verifier bound to that full head exits 0 withtotal_steps=9,exempted_steps=0, and no anomalies. Historical real #2188 scan remains 10 children = 9 success + one failed service artifact; #2189 is 9 children = 7 success + 2 failure.Outside-set attacks: float encodings
-0.0and0e0, non-standard Python-decodedNaN, list[0], and object{value:0}all block with zero exemptions. A JSON-0token decodes as Python integer zero and passes; I do not treat that as a type-confusion finding because it is a valid JSON integer representation numerically equal to zero, satisfying the documented integer-zero contract. Removing the load-bearing exact-type clause was independently mutation-tested and failed specifically on float zero. Automated Codex review found no actionable issue.Identity/integrity: review executed with
MOSAIC_GIT_IDENTITY=rev-974;git var GIT_AUTHOR_IDENTresolvedrev-974 <[email protected]>. I wrote no repository config, source changes, or commits.VERDICT: APPROVE — GO FOR MERGE-GATE ASSIGNMENT — bound to
57cae04f2b.No blocking or non-blocking findings.
Evidence against
docs/remediation/AC-RM61-TYPESTRICT.md:exit_codechanged to JSONfalsewrongly passed at old033b2ffb(exit 0,exempted_steps=1) and blocks at57cae04f(exit 1,exempted_steps=0).0.0likewise passed old (0/exempt 1) and blocks new (1/exempt 0)."0"blocked both old and new (exit 1,exempted_steps=0).nullblocked both old and new (exit 1,exempted_steps=0). The addedtruecase is also honestly a regression guard: it blocked both old and new.0, bound tof9746b23c88f8f9edb7170368dfc73a88dad7293, exits 0 withexempted_steps=1and exactly oneWP-K8S-1000-CI-POSTGRES-TEARDOWN.verify-terminal-green.py:45-54reads and type-checks the actualexit_codeinsideis_issue_1000_artifact; lines 144-145 place only that predicate’s matches intocandidates; line 169 requires exactly one candidate and no anomaly forexemption_applies.type(exit_code) is int, explicitly excludebool, then compare to zero. JSONtrueandfalseboth block. Redundancy assessment:not isinstance(exit_code, bool)is behaviorally redundant while exacttype(...) is intremains, but is intentional, requirement-aligned self-documentation rather than a defect. Mutation evidence: deleting the exact-type clause reopens float0.0, and the 17-case harness kills that mutation; deleting only the bool clause leaves behavior unchanged and the harness green because exact type still excludes bool. Thus the exact-type clause is load-bearing; the explicit bool clause is not currently load-bearing, but removing it alone does not reopen D-40. A futuretype(...) is int→isinstance(..., int)change without bool exclusion would be caught by the true/false cases.137remains exit 1 withexempted_steps=0; real #2189 remains red with integer exits 1 forci-postgresandtest.exempted_steps=0; omitted--expect-commitexits 2; absent record commit exits 1 withexempted_steps=0.033b2ffbchanges only strict handling of the existingexit_codeoperand.POD_NOT_FOUND, step name, type, state, exact message, candidate cardinality, and independent-anomaly behavior are unchanged.git diff --check, and committed 100755 modes also pass.The author’s final evidence labels are honest:
falseand0.0are identified as genuine red-first;true,"0", andnullare identified as pre-existing regression guards. There is no claim that all five were observed red-first.Exact-head CI full JSON/API scan: pipeline #2194 is terminal success at exact commit
57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f; workflowcisuccess; 9 children, 9 success, includingclone; verifier bound to that full head exits 0 withtotal_steps=9,exempted_steps=0, and no anomalies. Historical real #2188 scan remains 10 children = 9 success + one failed service artifact; #2189 is 9 children = 7 success + 2 failure.Outside-set attacks: float encodings
-0.0and0e0, non-standard Python-decodedNaN, list[0], and object{value:0}all block with zero exemptions. A JSON-0token decodes as Python integer zero and passes; I do not treat that as a type-confusion finding because it is a valid JSON integer representation numerically equal to zero, satisfying the documented integer-zero contract. Removing the load-bearing exact-type clause was independently mutation-tested and failed specifically on float zero. Automated Codex review found no actionable issue.Identity/integrity: review executed with
MOSAIC_GIT_IDENTITY=rev-974;git var GIT_AUTHOR_IDENTresolvedrev-974 <[email protected]>. I wrote no repository config, source changes, or commits.MERGE-GATE VERDICT: NO-GO
Commit-bound head:
57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f. This verdict is VOID immediately if the PR head moves.Primary mechanical evidence
open, not draft, not merged, mergeable, basemain, head57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f, authorcoder-mos1.DO NOT MERGE/ failure-injection description is absent. The live body describes the bounded RM-61 exemption, exact-head verifier binding, negative controls, no retry/re-trigger, and #1000 retirement. However, it contains onlyRefs #1000; it contains noCloses #Ndirective.successat commit57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f.pipeline-status.sh -n 2194 -f json; observed exactly 9 child steps, allsuccess, 0 skipped:clone,ci-postgres,install,sanitization,upgrade-guard,typecheck,lint,format,test.verify-terminal-green.py --expect-commit 57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82fover the pipeline #2194 JSON exited 0 withexpected_commit==commit==57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f,total_steps=9,state_counts={success: 9},exempted_steps=0,anomalies=[], verdictterminal-green.57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f== CI SHA57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f== PR head57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f.rev-974, stateAPPROVED, commit57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f; PR authorcoder-mos1!= reviewerrev-974. Review 70 is latest and current-head. Reviews 68 (REQUEST_CHANGES) and 69 (APPROVED) bind only superseded head033b2ffb46674b2c0bcc5197273c109b461f62d9; review 67 (REQUEST_CHANGES) binds only superseded heade7b29219e11efd0a19395156ac0b154bec0c3a73. There is noREQUEST_CHANGESagainst the current head.state=unknown/ exit 0 at this head; this is explicitly not treated as evidence.Fresh adversarial pass
I independently reviewed the exact-head verifier, its 17-case contract harness, documentation, and package registration. The harness and Python compile passed from an archive of this head;
git diff --checkpassed. The machine-verifiable commit binding and strict integer-zero exemption boundary behaved as specified. I found no source-code blocker beyond the tracking gate below.Blocking finding
[BLOCKER] Missing required closing linkage. The merge-gate mandate requires
Closes #Nin the PR body. The live provider body ends withRefs #1000, intentionally leaving #1000 open, and contains no closing directive for any issue. A reference is not a closing linkage.Add a valid
Closes #Nfor the delivered RM-61 work. If #1000 must remain open as the exemption-retirement issue, use a separate closeable delivery issue rather than falsely closing #1000. Request a fresh verdict after the provider body is corrected. No source commit is required for this metadata-only blocker.Disposition: NO-GO. I did not merge.
MERGE-GATE RE-VERDICT: GO
Commit-bound head:
57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f. This verdict replaces NO-GO comment 20420 and is VOID immediately if the PR head moves.Primary mechanical evidence
open, not draft, not merged, mergeable, basemain, unchanged head57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f, authorcoder-mos1.Closes #1034; raw issue API reports delivery issue #1034 open. The body retainsRefs #1000and does not containCloses #1000; raw issue API confirms retirement-trigger defect #1000 remains open. The metadata-only blocker from comment 20420 is cleared without moving the code head.successat commit57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f.pipeline-status.sh -n 2194 -f json; observed exactly 9 child steps, allsuccess, 0 skipped:clone,ci-postgres,install,sanitization,upgrade-guard,typecheck,lint,format,test.verify-terminal-green.py --expect-commit 57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82fover pipeline #2194 JSON exited 0 withexpected_commit==commit==57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f,total_steps=9,state_counts={success: 9},exempted_steps=0,anomalies=[], verdictterminal-green.57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f== CI SHA57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f== PR head57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f.rev-974, stateAPPROVED, commit57cae04f2b5d7072840ce515de2fbdb672bde82f; PR authorcoder-mos1!= reviewerrev-974. Review 70 remains latest and current-head. Reviews 68 (REQUEST_CHANGES) and 69 (APPROVED) bind only superseded head033b2ffb46674b2c0bcc5197273c109b461f62d9; review 67 (REQUEST_CHANGES) binds only superseded heade7b29219e11efd0a19395156ac0b154bec0c3a73. There is noREQUEST_CHANGESagainst the current head.state=unknown/ exit 0 at this head; this is explicitly not treated as evidence.fleet/run/PAUSEDis absent.The sole prior blocker was provider metadata. It is now cleared at the unchanged reviewed and CI-verified head; no fresh source review was required.
Disposition: GO. The coordinator retains the head-pinned merge hand. I did not merge.