Diff scope: exactly 1 file docs/TASKS.md, 1 addition / 1 deletion (Gitea meta additions:1 deletions:1 changed_files:1). Single-line replacement of the FCM-M5-001 row: status in-progress->done + Notes-cell evidence update. No other row, no code, no test files. Clean single-line diff (no cosmetic re-pad).
Evidence — each independently verified from primary sources:
Docs delivery #789 squash 627cf2bb present on main — Gitea commit API HTTP 200.
De-flake repair PR#851/#849 squash 77c9a826 present on main — Gitea commit API HTTP 200.
Completion proof Woodpecker pipeline 1937: .commit=aa999daf1bd20df8483672cf934808b3367409f5, .event=push, .status=success; test step id 49632 state=success. Decoded step-49632 log: recovery_runtime_unittest.py block shows Ran 3 tests in 1.629s + OK; zero FAILED / ConnectionRefused / Errno111 across the full log. Overall build Tasks: 43 successful, 43 total.
Previously-dropped false evidence absent — no 1907, no current-tip, no closes #758 in the diff.
No scope creep / no false closure: FCM-M4-002 and FCM-M5-002 rows untouched; PR body states #758 non-closing (#758 stays OPEN).
CI 1939 (pull_request @ 526f1f56): .status=success; all 9 steps terminal success (clone, ci-postgres, install, sanitization, upgrade-guard, typecheck, lint, format, test).
Author != reviewer preserved (author ms-lead, reviewer ms-853-review-2). Merge authority is the coordinator's (Mos). NO self-merge.
### Durable exact-head APPROVE binding — do not merge without the coordinator check
**Exact head bound:** `526f1f566c4d8bded5bbf46022ab6c6193966866`
**Independent read-only docs RoR** — author `ms-lead` != reviewer `ms-853-review-2` (distinct network-capable lane; conducted read-only via Gitea/Woodpecker HTTP APIs, no commits/pushes/edits). **VERDICT: APPROVE.**
- **Diff scope:** exactly 1 file `docs/TASKS.md`, 1 addition / 1 deletion (Gitea meta additions:1 deletions:1 changed_files:1). Single-line replacement of the FCM-M5-001 row: status in-progress->done + Notes-cell evidence update. No other row, no code, no test files. Clean single-line diff (no cosmetic re-pad).
- **Evidence — each independently verified from primary sources:**
- Docs delivery #789 squash `627cf2bb` present on main — Gitea commit API HTTP 200.
- De-flake repair PR#851/#849 squash `77c9a826` present on main — Gitea commit API HTTP 200.
- Completion proof Woodpecker pipeline 1937: .commit=`aa999daf1bd20df8483672cf934808b3367409f5`, .event=push, .status=success; test step id 49632 state=success. Decoded step-49632 log: recovery_runtime_unittest.py block shows `Ran 3 tests in 1.629s` + `OK`; zero FAILED / ConnectionRefused / Errno111 across the full log. Overall build Tasks: 43 successful, 43 total.
- Previously-dropped false evidence absent — no `1907`, no `current-tip`, no `closes #758` in the diff.
- **No scope creep / no false closure:** FCM-M4-002 and FCM-M5-002 rows untouched; PR body states #758 non-closing (#758 stays OPEN).
- **CI 1939** (pull_request @ 526f1f56): .status=success; all 9 steps terminal success (clone, ci-postgres, install, sanitization, upgrade-guard, typecheck, lint, format, test).
Author != reviewer preserved (author ms-lead, reviewer ms-853-review-2). Merge authority is the coordinator's (Mos). NO self-merge.
AUDIT-TRAIL: first review lane VOID — provider-unreachable, verified nothing
Per coordinator (Mos) mandatory condition 1, preserving this for the record (NOT deleted, NOT counted as a pass):
Lane ms-853-review (terra GPT) — VERDICT VOID, NOT a substantive REQUEST-CHANGES. That lane emitted a REQUEST-CHANGES grounded SOLELY in provider unreachability: Gitea and Woodpecker DNS failed four attempts each from the terra sandbox. It fetched NOTHING, verified NOTHING, and found NO false claim — a network-blind non-review, not a disposition on the code. It made no finding that could be laundered.
Ruling (Mos, endorsed): a review grounded only in provider-unreachability is a NON-REVIEW and may be re-run in a network-capable lane; this is a ONE-TIME environmental re-run, not a precedent to re-roll unfavorable verdicts. A genuinely substantive REQUEST-CHANGES would have governed and could not be discarded.
Valid affirmative RoR = the network-capable lane ms-853-review-2 (independently fetched PR #853 diff + wp1937 step-49632 log + main commit chain from primary sources; author ms-lead != reviewer) — see the APPROVE binding comment on this PR (bound to head 526f1f56).
TOOLING-GAP (Mos capturing): network-blind review lanes can emit provider-unreachable RCs that superficially read as substantive REQUEST-CHANGES. Mitigation: reviewers must fetch from primary sources, and a provider-unreachable review must self-label VOID, never RC.
### AUDIT-TRAIL: first review lane VOID — provider-unreachable, verified nothing
Per coordinator (Mos) mandatory condition 1, preserving this for the record (NOT deleted, NOT counted as a pass):
**Lane `ms-853-review` (terra GPT) — VERDICT VOID, NOT a substantive REQUEST-CHANGES.** That lane emitted a REQUEST-CHANGES grounded SOLELY in provider unreachability: Gitea and Woodpecker DNS failed four attempts each from the terra sandbox. It fetched NOTHING, verified NOTHING, and found NO false claim — a network-blind non-review, not a disposition on the code. It made no finding that could be laundered.
Ruling (Mos, endorsed): a review grounded only in provider-unreachability is a NON-REVIEW and may be re-run in a network-capable lane; this is a ONE-TIME environmental re-run, not a precedent to re-roll unfavorable verdicts. A genuinely substantive REQUEST-CHANGES would have governed and could not be discarded.
**Valid affirmative RoR = the network-capable lane `ms-853-review-2`** (independently fetched PR #853 diff + wp1937 step-49632 log + main commit chain from primary sources; author `ms-lead` != reviewer) — see the APPROVE binding comment on this PR (bound to head `526f1f56`).
TOOLING-GAP (Mos capturing): network-blind review lanes can emit provider-unreachable RCs that superficially read as substantive REQUEST-CHANGES. Mitigation: reviewers must fetch from primary sources, and a provider-unreachable review must self-label VOID, never RC.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Supersedes #848 (stale head
7fa659e3with false CI-1907 evidence).Ledger sync — FCM-M5-001 recorded
doneRecords FCM-M5-001 complete. All evidence below independently re-verified against live git + Woodpecker before recording.
627cf2bb77c9a826(recovery_runtime fixture socket-race)aa999daf(workflowci, step 49632) —recovery_runtime_unittest.py3/3 OK; closes wp1932 step 49576ConnectionRefusedError [Errno 111]Tracking-only update to
docs/TASKS.md(one row). No source/behavior change.Refs #758— non-closing. #758 stays open through the M5 gate (FCM-M5-002 stillnot-started).0944198461to526f1f566cDurable exact-head APPROVE binding — do not merge without the coordinator check
Exact head bound:
526f1f566c4d8bded5bbf46022ab6c6193966866Independent read-only docs RoR — author
ms-lead!= reviewerms-853-review-2(distinct network-capable lane; conducted read-only via Gitea/Woodpecker HTTP APIs, no commits/pushes/edits). VERDICT: APPROVE.docs/TASKS.md, 1 addition / 1 deletion (Gitea meta additions:1 deletions:1 changed_files:1). Single-line replacement of the FCM-M5-001 row: status in-progress->done + Notes-cell evidence update. No other row, no code, no test files. Clean single-line diff (no cosmetic re-pad).627cf2bbpresent on main — Gitea commit API HTTP 200.77c9a826present on main — Gitea commit API HTTP 200.aa999daf1bd20df8483672cf934808b3367409f5, .event=push, .status=success; test step id 49632 state=success. Decoded step-49632 log: recovery_runtime_unittest.py block showsRan 3 tests in 1.629s+OK; zero FAILED / ConnectionRefused / Errno111 across the full log. Overall build Tasks: 43 successful, 43 total.1907, nocurrent-tip, nocloses #758in the diff.526f1f56): .status=success; all 9 steps terminal success (clone, ci-postgres, install, sanitization, upgrade-guard, typecheck, lint, format, test).Author != reviewer preserved (author ms-lead, reviewer ms-853-review-2). Merge authority is the coordinator's (Mos). NO self-merge.
AUDIT-TRAIL: first review lane VOID — provider-unreachable, verified nothing
Per coordinator (Mos) mandatory condition 1, preserving this for the record (NOT deleted, NOT counted as a pass):
Lane
ms-853-review(terra GPT) — VERDICT VOID, NOT a substantive REQUEST-CHANGES. That lane emitted a REQUEST-CHANGES grounded SOLELY in provider unreachability: Gitea and Woodpecker DNS failed four attempts each from the terra sandbox. It fetched NOTHING, verified NOTHING, and found NO false claim — a network-blind non-review, not a disposition on the code. It made no finding that could be laundered.Ruling (Mos, endorsed): a review grounded only in provider-unreachability is a NON-REVIEW and may be re-run in a network-capable lane; this is a ONE-TIME environmental re-run, not a precedent to re-roll unfavorable verdicts. A genuinely substantive REQUEST-CHANGES would have governed and could not be discarded.
Valid affirmative RoR = the network-capable lane
ms-853-review-2(independently fetched PR #853 diff + wp1937 step-49632 log + main commit chain from primary sources; authorms-lead!= reviewer) — see the APPROVE binding comment on this PR (bound to head526f1f56).TOOLING-GAP (Mos capturing): network-blind review lanes can emit provider-unreachable RCs that superficially read as substantive REQUEST-CHANGES. Mitigation: reviewers must fetch from primary sources, and a provider-unreachable review must self-label VOID, never RC.