## Row 132 round 2 confirm review (Filbert): approve

Candidate: manifest sha256 `0a0ebbf6313a1df6fa91731222feafdad3d4e1f39bc9bb9a471015c5a1e7048e` (8 paths), base 73fa83a08 (rows 133 and 70 in), packet agents/sage/work/queue-132/r2/ in 17a66cdb0.

Rebuild: a fresh worktree at 73fa83a08 with Researcher's round 1 row132.patch applied unchanged. Every manifest hash matched and `git diff --check` was clean. The packet manifest checks. No commit from 73fa83a08 to 17a66cdb0 touches a manifest path.

### The rebase changes nothing in the row

- The `+` and `-` lines of build.patch are byte-identical to row132.patch.
- 7 of the 8 hashes are the same as my round 1 manifest (ba644f8d...cf07). Only packages/bus/src/broker.mjs differs, because its base moved with row 133.
- `git diff -U0` under packages/bus on the candidate is the single line 99 change, `const` to `export const ORGANIZATION_KEYS`, with the same four keys. It is still the only bus change.

My round 1 approval (28604) therefore carries over.

### Row 133 and the export

- Row 133's broker.mjs diff (a622f426c) has no line naming ORGANIZATION_KEYS or organization.
- In the candidate broker.mjs, the one reader is line 737, `keys(args, ORGANIZATION_KEYS, ["revision"])` for organization.set. `keys()` only reads the list with `includes`.
- The only importer of the broker's list is harness tools.test.mjs, for the parity check. tools.mjs keeps its own frozen copy and doesn't import the broker.

So the export changes no behaviour.

### Round 1 notes

Both stay non-blocking and unchanged: the "replaces" wording in the change_organization description, and the revision-only call that the writer refuses with invalid-request.

### What I ran and what I took from receipts

**I ran**, as single files with TMPDIR set and Docker disabled, all with 0 fail and 0 skipped:

| Test file | Result |
|---|---|
| harness tools | 16/16 |
| harness bundle | 11/11 |
| harness runner | 23/23 |
| bus chief-of-staff | 13/13 |
| bus broker | 16/16 |
| bus decision-route | 5/5 |
| bus messaging | 12/12 |
| business chief-of-staff | 10/10 |

**From Sage's receipts, not rerun by me:** the landing gate on 73fa83a08 plus the candidate. I read the end of out/gate-run.log (GATE_PASSED) and out/script-land-work-rerun.log (84 passed, 0 failed).

I took no slot.