# #751 Native Kanban/SOT canonical publication — Ultron final gate **Verdict: GO** — zero BLOCKER/HIGH findings. ## Scope / integrity - Reviewed `/home/hermes/agent-work/stack-kanban-canon` staged delta only: exactly 16 documentation/contract artifacts; no unstaged delta; `git diff --cached --check` passes. - This is a publication canon, not a runtime implementation. The explicit implementation hold prevents feature work until canon merge and prerequisite release (`docs/requirements/native-kanban-sot.md:8-9`; `docs/native-kanban-sot/TASKS.md:45-67`). ## Acceptance mapping and findings | Requirement area | Final evidence / result | | ------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | Sole PostgreSQL SOT, generated projections, outage proposals | Requirements D3/D4 and fixed invariants prohibit alternate writers and import (`docs/requirements/native-kanban-sot.md:22-23,32-44`). Health contract keeps public observation separate from branded transaction-local proof (`contracts/health-state.v1.ts:44-84`) and freezes 503/409/502/504 mappings (`:91-184`). Proposal table uses workspace-aware event FKs (`contracts/kanban-schema.v1.ts:847-908`); exact submission/acceptance transaction semantics are specified (`SHARED-CONTRACT.md:81-89`). PASS. | | Workspace tenancy, planning, assignments, evidence | Workspace-composite task and proposal relations plus active-member rules are explicit (`SHARED-CONTRACT.md:40-48`; `kanban-schema.v1.ts:587-637,875-908`). Lease/checkpoint relations bind workspace/task/assignment/session/fence, with one active lease and bigint fencing (`:1062-1114`). PASS. | | Coordinator, gates, concurrency/recovery | Pure Coordinator has snapshot-only decision methods (`mechanical-coordinator.v1.ts:186-198`); persistence port owns locked ID validation and recovery (`:371-407`). Requirements forbid Coordinator scope/gate/certification/merge authority and Certifier merge authority (`requirements:39-40`; `MISSION-MANIFEST.md` authority table). Recovery validator rejects unknown fields, PITR/WAL/RPO/storage/high-assurance violations (`recovery-posture.v1.ts:193-369`). PASS. | | Migration/N-1/API/task decomposition | N-1 expand/backfill/compatibility/switch/contract order and proposal DDL sequence are concrete (`SHARED-CONTRACT.md:69-115`). Frozen exact Gateway/DTO registry and non-overlapping lane ownership/prerequisites are present (`SHARED-CONTRACT.md:244-282`; `TASKS.md:45-67,81-259`). PASS. | | Documentation / seven owner decisions / evidence | D1–D7 are all explicitly ratified (`requirements:20-26`); all 26 REQ sections contain acceptance criteria. Index/manifest/task graph link requirements, frozen contracts, ownership, and evidence. Relative-link audit passes. PASS. | ## Independent verification performed ```text git diff --cached --check PASS ./node_modules/.bin/prettier --check PASS ./node_modules/.bin/tsc --noEmit --strict PASS Python relative Markdown link audit PASS (0 errors) Python requirement acceptance audit PASS (26 requirements; 0 missing acceptance sections) Static staged scope/status check PASS (16 staged docs-only; no unstaged delta) ``` The full schema-contract strict type check cannot resolve `drizzle-orm` from this docs-only worktree; this is an environment dependency-resolution limitation, not a contract diagnostic. Independent external publication validation and final re-review record the strict all-four-contract check against the current Stack Drizzle toolchain as PASS. ## Residual items - **LOW:** implementation must deliver the declared KBN-100/KBN-110/KBN-140 proposal-event-chain, tenant, failure-mapping, and SecReview evidence before P0/P1 release. This is a forward implementation obligation already frozen in the canon, not a publication defect. - **LOW:** selected infrastructure backup provider/recovery tier and migration/cutover thresholds remain owner-controlled implementation decisions, bounded by the normative recovery contract and change control. No source, staging, commit, provider, CI, or deployment state was mutated.