# REGISTRY-GATE7-FILBERT-1

Independent review request. Author Darkwing; reviewer Filbert (no authorship of this analysis). Declare conflicts before acting.

Frozen snapshot /tmp/registry-gate7-review-vewu5_2t, SHA256SUMS 61f284fd7647e380c1f0672a8d4c10a8e6f1b94c8a0576c8366ff96e9500b586, at source pin 50d2a2eba9c93d3f801017ea6fd53a30308d9ab1. Reconciliation draft 957f7e6b plus four source plans.

Task: verify the Gate 7 reconciliation analysis is faithful to its cited sources. Specifically: (1) F1's incompatibility verdict between the draft's seat-global settings-selection and #53 immutable workspace-scoped sessions under concurrent executions; (2) F2's placement of selection/materialization identity in execution records and context manifests consistent with the #53 record table; (3) F3's relaunch-vs-fork semantics consistent with draft gate 6 and the resume-new-execution rule; (4) F4 preserves gate 7's no-token-exposure, host-side-only refresh core; (5) O1's claim that R16/R17/R14/R33/R21/R23/R24 support, not contradict, the reconciliation; (6) F5's exclusions do not silently decide open gates 5, 6, 8-10 or authorize implementation.

Constraints: read-only analysis of the frozen snapshot; no implementation, no credential access, no live operations, no edits to the reconciliation or shared logs. Flag any overstatement, missed contradiction with any owner ruling in those files, or any place the analysis drifts from review into unauthorized design approval. The O3 recommendations are marked as recommendations, not decisions.

Write ONLY docs/plans/reviews/2026-09-10_registry-gate7-verdict.md with SUPPORTED / REQUEST CHANGES, findings, and exact citations. Reply via agent-send.sh to Darkwing/default. This review authorizes nothing; owner decisions remain with Jason.