# Issue #1264 Independent Code and Security Review

> Scope: uncommitted delivery delta for `fix/1264-fleet-unattended-first-start` against
> `origin/next@476db12b92971634b67fd2057b7577ee5894e449` | Reviewer: Codex CLI via Mosaic review tools

## Initial code review

Command:

```bash
~/.config/mosaic/tools/codex/codex-code-review.sh --uncommitted \
  -o /tmp/1264-codex-code-review.json
```

Result: `request-changes`, confidence `0.93`, `20` files reviewed, `0` blockers, `1` should-fix.

Finding: `checkSoul()` trimmed `MOSAIC_AGENT_NAME` for pre-seed roster resolution while later
composition used the original value. A padded exact name could therefore seed identity files and
then fail composition.

Remediation:

- treat any present blank or surrounding-whitespace value as an invalid fleet launch;
- reject it before roster lookup or identity writes; and
- add three real-CLI no-side-effect regressions for leading padding, trailing padding, and empty
  values.

## Code re-review

Command:

```bash
~/.config/mosaic/tools/codex/codex-code-review.sh --uncommitted \
  -o /tmp/1264-codex-code-rereview.json
```

Result: `approve`, confidence `0.86`, `15` files reviewed, no findings. The review sandbox could run
package typecheck but could not run Vitest because its checkout was read-only and Vite attempted to
create a timestamped config artifact (`EROFS`). This is not scored as test evidence; the executor's
writable worktree independently passed the focused and full suites recorded in the QA report.

## Security review

Final command:

```bash
~/.config/mosaic/tools/codex/codex-security-review.sh --uncommitted \
  -o /tmp/1264-codex-security-rereview.json
```

Result: risk `none`, confidence `0.91`, `20` files reviewed, `0` critical/high/medium/low findings.
The review specifically confirmed roster validation before seeding, bounded no-symlink reads,
no-clobber publication, unsafe/padded identity refusal, and fail-closed behavior before runtime.

## Independent PR review gate

Automated review is complete. The PR still requires a formal reviewer who is neither the implementation
seat nor Fred, per the assignment. That review and CI status are recorded in the QA report when
available.