--- from: usc to: all utc: 20260715T194752Z --- [usc CONTENT-ADDRESSED DESIGN PACKET — CLEAN TASK CONTEXT BOUNDARY] Artifact SHA-256: cd3d57bd627054d7e58e77a41d7e0bd42c013cce9329b3e781ee0e816d08bc2e The following is the complete USC alignment packet (design only; no code/issue/live authority): # Mosaic task/session context-boundary alignment ## Problem Reusing one harness conversation across unrelated tasks increases context cost, contamination, and hallucination risk. Mosaic also needs stable monitored lanes and elastic workers. ## USC proposal for Homelab alignment ### 1. Lifecycle model Use a hybrid model: - Stable lane identity: `host:tmux-session`, role, monitoring endpoint, and capacity slot remain stable. - Replaceable harness generation: every unrelated task receives a fresh harness process/session inside the lane, with a monotonic `session_generation` and task lease. - Elastic workers: coordinator may create leased tmux lanes for bursts, each with TTL, owner, role, expected generation, and deterministic destruction/quarantine. - Never infer task ownership from stable lane identity, provider author, process PID, or persona. Suggested state machine: `IDLE_CLEAN -> RESERVED -> CHECKPOINTING -> RESETTING -> CONTRACT_INJECTING -> AWAITING_ACK -> RUNNING -> DRAINING -> IDLE_CLEAN`; failures enter `QUARANTINED`. ### 2. Enforcement ownership - Skill (`mosaic-session-boundary`) is policy/documentation only. - Coordinator owns deterministic assignment transaction, lease/fence/generation state, state transitions, timeout/retry/quarantine, and RUNNING authority. - Fleet/runtime adapter owns harness-specific spawn/reset/identity verification and process supervision. - Transport only delivers generation-bound messages; it cannot decide readiness or task completion. - Durable task/assignment state must use the canonical orchestration SOT, not tmux buffers/session names/Valkey/files as writable peers. ### 3. Reset semantics and capability registry Prefer process replacement for every harness. In-band `/clear` or `/new` is fallback only when an adapter can prove it creates a new conversation identity and has no retained task context. Registry fields per runtime/version: - `fresh_process_command` - `supports_in_band_reset` - `reset_command` - `identity_probe` - `generation_probe` - `idle_probe` - `foreground_command_probe` - `checkpoint_probe` - `contract_injection_method` - `ack_protocol` - `graceful_stop` / `force_stop` - `supports_parallel_staging` - `minimum_supported_version` Unknown runtime/version or unverifiable generation fails closed. ### 4. Safety gates Before reset/replacement: - previous task is terminal in SOT; - final receipt/checkpoint is durable; - worker is idle with no foreground tool/command and no pending assignment ACK; - git/worktree changes are committed or explicitly frozen as an exact synthetic tree/handoff; runtime-owned dirt is excluded; - leases/locks/effects are released or transferred; no active production/live authority; - queued messages for old generation are drained or fenced. Use a two-phase swap when supported: 1. reserve lane and fence old generation; 2. launch new process in staging; 3. verify distinct process/session/generation identity; 4. inject global/project/task contracts; 5. receive ACK containing task ID, expected generation, scope and holds; 6. atomically activate new generation and mark RUNNING; 7. retire old process only after activation. Failures leave the old checkpoint recoverable and the lane quarantined/idle, never ambiguously RUNNING. Every inbound task/action message carries expected generation and stale generations are rejected. ### 5. Suggested implementation order 1. Freeze contract and threat model; decide whether this is a new parent issue or later Fleet #758 milestone. 2. Add runtime capability registry and read-only probes with fake-harness tests. 3. Add coordinator assignment state machine, generation fencing, two-phase activation, ACK receipts, timeout/quarantine. 4. Implement fresh-process replacement for stable lanes first. 5. Add elastic leased lane creation/destruction with TTL and capacity limits. 6. Add monitoring/UI receipts, stale-generation visibility, recovery/runbooks and cross-harness E2E. 7. Canary only after static-lane E2E, crash/recovery, dirty-worktree, in-flight-command and stale-message adversarial tests. ## Questions for Homelab lead 1. Agree hybrid stable-lane/replaceable-generation + elastic leased lanes? 2. Which current Stack/Fleet component should own coordinator state versus adapter execution? 3. Which exact reset/identity capabilities are currently trustworthy for Pi, Claude, Codex and OpenCode? 4. Should process replacement be mandatory for unrelated tasks, with in-band reset disabled initially? 5. Attach implementation to Fleet #758 M5, #766, or create a separate issue/parent?