stack/agents/filbert/work/queue-105/r1/verdict.json

{"body":"Row 105 round 1 (#1599), Filbert: **approve**.\n\nCandidate manifest SHA-256: `cd6d5eb3e4093ac157f63d05cb639d243d76c6bde1a03e78efb8f29e191b6b44`. Base: `0d71b9ddd`. Packet: `agents/researcher/work/queue-105/r1/`. This answers request 28246.\n\nI rebuilt the candidate in my own worktree at 0d71b9ddd and applied build.patch. All 5 manifest hashes match, `git diff --check` is clean, and the worktree shows only the 5 paths. None of the 5 paths changed from 0d71b9ddd to the current refactor head. With Sage's leave, I ran `tests/review.test.mjs` in packages/bus (8 pass, 0 fail) and `tests/tools.test.mjs` in packages/harness (11 pass, 0 fail). I ran no full suite and no queue-commit.sh.\n\n### What Sage asked me to check\n\n**`held`, routing and the delivery row agree.** The case computes `held` from `this.#holder(s.business, a.to)` with `h?.op === 'claim' ? h.holder_run : null`. `#reviewMessage` makes its own `#holder(s.business, to)` call with the same query and the same `op === 'claim'` test, and records that run on the `routed` delivery. Strictly these are two calls, not one, but both run in the same synchronous request, and nothing between them writes `role_claims`, so they read the same row. The new test pins all three for both cases: reply `held`, event `held`, and the delivery's `holder_run` (`reviewer-run` held, `null` after release). I reran three mutants with the test names captured:\n- M3-style (`held = h?.holder_run ?? null`, a release counted as held): killed by the new test.\n- M4 (event records `held: null`): killed by the existing event deep-equal (\"names the latest pushed commit\") and by the new test.\n- `held` dropped from the reply: killed by the new test.\nThe manifest verified again after each restore.\n\n**Release, then request, then claim.** After `role.release` the latest `role_claims` row is a release, so `held` is `null` and the delivery is `routed` with `holder_run: null`. A later `role.claim` by `reviewer-2` adds a second `routed` row for that message to `reviewer-2`, through the existing `#routeWaiting`. The test asserts both rows in order. Correct.\n\n**Existing reply fields unchanged.** The return only appends `held`. `request`, `message`, `commit` and `ref` are computed as before, and the existing test still checks `commit` and `ref` and uses `request` and `message`. The event body gains only `held`, and the existing deep-equal was updated for exactly that key.\n\n**tools.mjs wording against the code.** \"The reply's held names the run holding the reviewer role, or is null when no reviewer is running\" matches: it is the claiming run or `null`. \"A null request waits until a reviewer launches\" is close: the code waits for a run to claim the role, which is what a launched reviewer does. The instruction to tell whoever launches roles is the brief's text. The README row says the same, in more exact terms (\"waits for a claim\").\n\n**script-queue skip.** The packet's skip of `verify/render --check` is outside this row's code, and Sage's canonical-root rerun covers it.\n\n### Scope\n\nbroker.mjs changes only inside the `review.request` case. tools.mjs changes only the `request_review` description. The README edit is the `review.request` row of the verb table. The brief says \"the review paragraph only\", and the README has no standalone review paragraph. The table row is the one place that describes this reply and event, so I take that as the right reading. The review loop paragraph at README:373-375 says \"The review loop adds no event kind and no schema change\", which still holds, since `held` is a body key and schema.sql checks only `json_valid(body)`.\n\n### Notes (none blocking)\n\n- N1. A revoked reviewer takes the same null branch as a release, since the latest row isn't a claim, but no test covers revoke. BUILD.md says so.\n- N2. No assertion pins the reply's full key set. A deep-equal on the reply in the existing test would catch a later rename or dropped field.\n- N3. `held` is a snapshot from routing time. It doesn't mean the run is still alive when the requester reads the reply. BUILD.md states this. A short clause in the README row (\"when the request is routed\") already says it.\n- N4. Each of the packet's mutant kills names only the file, not the test case. My reruns above name the cases for M3, M4 and the reply mutant.\n\nThe gate still needs Sage's suite rerun, and the decision 109 notices to Mos before and after. The bus side goes live only at a bus restart with Mos's go.\n"}