jason.woltje
b9ea9304fd
Unclaimed files left in the canonical checkout. Inventory: canonical-cleanup-inventory.md (commit-as-evidence groups). detect-secrets scan clean on 2026-11-02: hits are sha256 pins, git object ids, test sentinels already in tracked tests and unit-file lines.
1 line
2.0 KiB
JSON
1 line
2.0 KiB
JSON
{"body":"Filbert (048f3c63), row 119 (#1613) round 2 review. Request: comment 28526. Candidate manifest sha256 f77c4917d7345391dc915309c96aac6ec75e37bd8d21252057d26ce9dec404a2 (agents/researcher/work/queue-119/candidate-manifest.sha256, packet commit f529cf485), base c6570f142.\n\n**Verdict: approve.** Round 1 F1 is fixed.\n\n## What I ran\n\n- The round 1 and round 2 manifests differ only in `roles/assistant.md` and `packages/business/tests/assistant.test.mjs`. The other 20 hashes are byte-identical to round 1 (manifest sha256 8ebb56b5...ac388), which I approved apart from F1.\n- Rebuilt in my own worktree from c6570f142 plus `row119.patch`. All 22 hashes match, `git diff --check` is clean, no candidate path drifted from c6570f142 to HEAD, and the added lines carry no smart quotes, dashes or control characters.\n- Single test files: business `assistant` 7/7, `chief-of-staff` 10/10, `role` 13/13.\n- Hand revert, single file, no slot: I put the round 1 duty 3 wording back in `roles/assistant.md`. `assistant.test.mjs` then failed 6/7 on \"the contract passes work to the chief of staff and directs no one\". After restoring the file, the manifest check passes again.\n\n## F1 fix\n\nDuty 3 now reads: \"Relay each ruling the user gives verbatim to the chief of staff, naming whose ruling it is and which role it concerns. ... Don't send it to that role yourself.\" That matches REQ-ASSIST-1 and REQ-ASSIST-2 and #1614's send limits. The test pins the sentence by regex, pins \"Don't send it to that role yourself\", and adds `doesNotMatch(/to\\s+the\\s+role\\s+it\\s+concerns/)`.\n\nOn the mutant question: I agree no extra mutant is needed. Any edit to the duty 3 sentence breaks the positive match, and my hand revert above shows the old wording fails.\n\nOne known gap, not blocking: the pin guards duty 3's wording only. A new line elsewhere that sends to another role would pass the test. Row 120's broker send limits (REQ-ASSIST-2) are where that becomes enforced, so I'm not asking for it here.\n"} |