stack/agents/filbert/work/queue-135/r3/body.md at dev-console

0 Fork 1

Files

T

jason.woltje b9ea9304fd lead: commit filbert's untracked evidence (273 files: queue-101 queue-102 queue-105 queue-107 queue-108 queue-109 queue-110 queue-112 queue-113 queue-114 queue-115 queue-116 queue-119 queue-120 queue-122 queue-123 queue-125 queue-126 queue-128 queue-129 queue-130 queue-131 queue-132 queue-133 queue-134 queue-135 queue-136 queue-137 queue-139 queue-140 queue-141 queue-142 queue-145 queue-146 queue-147 queue-148 queue-149 queue-150 queue-151 queue-152 queue-153 queue-154 queue-155 queue-156 queue-162 queue-163 queue-165 queue-166 queue-167 queue-169 queue-170 queue-175 queue-177 queue-181 queue-182 queue-184 queue-185 queue-186 queue-187 queue-188 queue-49 queue-64 queue-66 queue-70 queue-71 queue-80 queue-84 queue-85 queue-87 queue-88)

Unclaimed files left in the canonical checkout. Inventory: canonical-cleanup-inventory.md (commit-as-evidence groups). detect-secrets scan clean on 2026-11-02: hits are sha256 pins, git object ids, test sentinels already in tracked tests and unit-file lines.

2026-11-02 15:05:14 -06:00

4.6 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

Row 135 round 3 review (Filbert): approve

Candidate: manifest sha256 e6d33c0f986a0f029f0d8e2433bb7ec5ccc30fc45dfe110d5def354686e36b64, 5 paths, base 7a2987cf5, patch agents/sage/work/queue-135/build.patch (sage-0506, request comment 28766). Briefs re-pinned in 1d0386dd0, blob 221f9a6e.

Every round 2 finding (comment 28765) is fixed. Two notes below don't block: one on the acceptance script and one on the briefs, which are outside the candidate.

Rebuild

A fresh worktree at 7a2987cf5. This round's build.patch is a plain diff, not mbox, so git am refused it ("Patch format detection failed"). I applied it with git apply --index instead.
All 5 manifest hashes matched, and git diff --check was clean (5 files, +412 -9).
The added lines have no dash, curly-quote or control characters.
No commit from 7a2987cf5 to refactor HEAD touches a manifest path.

Per finding

B1, fixed. packages/tasks/requirements.json is at "1.5" with the 15 new ids placed in PRD order (REQ-ROLE-5 follows REQ-ROLE-4), 58 in all. The tasks test pins 58, '1.5' and requirements[58] in the twice case, and the bus test pins 58. The tasks test matches the list against the PRD's **REQ-...** bullets in order, plus the PRD status line's version, and it passes.
F2, fixed. The source block says "as Mos gave it", with no AGENTS.md. Mos's Q5 is quoted as "Q167 covers shrinking GATED_ONLY and the role grants through rows 135 and 139.", which matches north-star-rows. The list-change and grant sentence is now attributed to Sage's plan for the rows.
F3, fixed. REQ-PROJ-4 is limited to Console saves and says a git commit outside the Console sends no notice yet. The tech notes and row 143's brief both call that a later row.
F4, fixed. The tech note now says the host refuses a non-fast-forward push today (packages/seat/src/working.mjs), and REQ-WAIT-1 makes any future path a hard wait.
F5, fixed.
- REQ-ROLE-5 gives merge-gate one grant, git.merge.protected cross-role, says raising needs no grant, and has it raise in the technical domain. The 116-character line is wrapped.
- REQ-DEC-5 binds the instance and the thread, which matches #checkAuthority.
- Row 149's brief has the technical-domain raise, cto able to message merge-gate, a technical raise routed to arbiters.technical, and an arbiter equal to merge-gate refused or pinned by a test.
F6, fixed. REQ-PROJ-3 now matches row 148's brief: the spec and the Markdown in docs/, a source editor beside a preview built from repo code, and a WYSIWYG library only if it meets the license, pin, hash, no-runtime-load and no-CSP-change bar. 1.5 records that none did. I did not reread Researcher's library work, and I took the Toast UI ruling from the brief as written.
F7, fixed. The land refusal of a gated git.merge.protected decision, with the coder test (coder raises a cited merge, the arbiter approves, land refuses), is in row 139's brief, and row 137's brief has the fallback. The PRD tech note says "Row 139 carries it, or row 137 if 139 lands first".
A1 to A4, fixed. A1: the second tab opens before the first save. A2: the prerequisites name both instances, launch.instances and arbiters.technical = cto. A3: step 8 checks the trail instead of a raise Jason can't make. A4: step 10 names row 141's command and points to docs/TOOLS.md.

Notes (non-blocking)

Acceptance step 8 runs mosaic trail with no argument. cli.mjs's usage is mosaic trail <task|decision>, so the step should name the task, or the decision it reads. Doc-only: grep -rlF 314.md packages/*/tests scripts/test-*.sh finds nothing.
The briefs' rules for which row carries the land refusal leave a gap. This is outside the candidate.
- Row 137's brief: 137 carries it "if row 139 has landed before 137 does".
- Row 139's brief: 139 carries it "if row 137 has landed when 139 is built; otherwise 137 carries it".
- The gap: 139 is built while 137 is still open, then 137 lands first. Row 137's rule doesn't fire, because 139 hadn't landed, and row 139's rule hands it to 137, so neither row carries it.
- Suggested fix: phrase both as "whichever lands second carries it", which is what the PRD note says. Then check it at each row's landing.

What I ran and what I took from receipts

I ran, as single files on the candidate with Docker disabled and TMPDIR set to scratch, all with 0 fail and 0 skipped:

Test file	Result
tasks requirements	3/3
bus requirements	3/3
tasks verbs	31/31
cli stack-copy	12/12

I ran no mutants, no suite and no gate, and I took no slot. I took nothing from other seats' receipts.

4.6 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History