stack/agents/filbert/work/queue-139/r2/body.md at dev-console

0 Fork 1

Files

T

jason.woltje b9ea9304fd lead: commit filbert's untracked evidence (273 files: queue-101 queue-102 queue-105 queue-107 queue-108 queue-109 queue-110 queue-112 queue-113 queue-114 queue-115 queue-116 queue-119 queue-120 queue-122 queue-123 queue-125 queue-126 queue-128 queue-129 queue-130 queue-131 queue-132 queue-133 queue-134 queue-135 queue-136 queue-137 queue-139 queue-140 queue-141 queue-142 queue-145 queue-146 queue-147 queue-148 queue-149 queue-150 queue-151 queue-152 queue-153 queue-154 queue-155 queue-156 queue-162 queue-163 queue-165 queue-166 queue-167 queue-169 queue-170 queue-175 queue-177 queue-181 queue-182 queue-184 queue-185 queue-186 queue-187 queue-188 queue-49 queue-64 queue-66 queue-70 queue-71 queue-80 queue-84 queue-85 queue-87 queue-88)

Unclaimed files left in the canonical checkout. Inventory: canonical-cleanup-inventory.md (commit-as-evidence groups). detect-secrets scan clean on 2026-11-02: hits are sha256 pins, git object ids, test sentinels already in tracked tests and unit-file lines.

2026-11-02 15:05:14 -06:00

6.6 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

Row 139 round 2 review (Filbert): approve

Candidate: manifest sha256 a4c5657ff69ef0665285e4c2095858346f2d325d454c6fa99edd999633dcd0f0, 14 paths, patch sha256 a5f21ead8195382fbf21da0ee8f66b794329c4b7f8737fa942ccd6c219524e3f, base 5661bd233, packet agents/dewey/work/queue-139/ in c83ee5d82 (request comment 28783). Brief: docs/plans/2026-10-15_q167-rows-r3.md at blob 6805904555.

I found no defect. All five Q169 points hold in the code, and the four tests the brief names for Q169 are there, plus a fifth. The notes below don't block.

Rebuild

A fresh worktree at 5661bd233. build.patch is a plain diff, so I applied it with git apply --index.
All 14 manifest hashes matched, and git diff --cached --check was clean (14 files, +418 -62).
The added lines have no dash, curly-quote or control characters.
No commit from 5661bd233 to refactor HEAD touches a manifest path.

Against my round 1 approval (manifest 5657702e)

I rebuilt round 1 from 62f354746's build.patch and compared the two trees path by path.

Unchanged: bus spec-fixtures.mjs, business README, vocabulary.mjs and hard-waits test, and scripts/test-land-work.sh.
Changed: bus broker.mjs, bus hard-waits test and bus README. The broker diff is only #hardWait, #protectedEnd, the target passed to #classification, and the two call sites. Nothing else in the broker moved.
New: the PRD, bus chief-of-staff test, harness README and runner test, and tasks requirements.json and its test. These are the three groups Sage accepted in sage-0539.

The five Q169 points

The chief of staff's end of the assistant passes; its own run stays refused. On the reason path the own-run refusal still runs first (a.role === s.role), then #protectedEnd(s, a.role), which returns for a caller whose definition is chief-of-staff (STAFF_TO). Q169 test 1 and chief-of-staff REQ-COS-1 pin both. lead, granted role.end, is refused role-end-refused, and no action.allowed is written, because the reason path's #consumeAuthority runs in the caller's transaction.
A revoke citing a human-resolved decision passes. #protectedEnd accepts r.via === 'cli'. decision.resolve writes cli only when s.human, and #human (line 304) requires via 'cli' and outsideAgent. A tester can't resolve (TESTER_VERBS). The only resolve caller outside the broker is packages/cli/src/cli.mjs; the WebUI doesn't resolve. So via 'cli' means the human. Q169 test 3 pins it.
Every other role's revoke of the assistant is refused, including an arbiter-resolved cited raise. #hardWait makes the raise gated and keeps it from the arbiter, cited or not, for any raiser and any grant (Q169 tests 2 and 5). #checkAuthority also runs #protectedEnd after decision-not-approved, so an arbiter's resolution recorded via 'broker' is refused even if the target became the assistant after the raise (test 2, the second Broker on the same store). d.class !== cls recomputes the class at use, so a decision raised cross-role before this row no longer matches either.
Any other cited revoke routes by REQ-DEC-2. #hardWait is false for a target outside END_PROTECTED, so arbitrated is unchanged from round 1. Q169 test 4 goes gated to reviewer and executes {revoked: true}; test 5 covers cross-role and within-role grants.
PRD 1.6 records Q169 as Jason's ruling. The status line moves to 1.6, and a 1.6 source block quotes Q169 word for word as Sage gave it (I can't read the brain repo it cites). REQ-ROLE-2, REQ-ROLE-4 and REQ-WAIT-1 gain text, and the 1.6 notes record where each 1.5 text ended, the same pattern 1.5 used for REQ-DEC-2. No earlier version's text was changed. Mos's two REQ-ROLE-2 sentences (sage-0545) match the code: the chief's end consumes role.end, which is routed, so it needs no decision; #hardWait reads the target, not the raiser, so the chief's revoke is a hard wait too.

Also checked: tasks requirements.json is at 1.6 with the same 58 ids, and its test matches the PRD status line. The harness runner and README changes follow from the chief's end now reaching not-held. In the broker diff, #hardWait reads roles[target]?.definition, so a missing or odd target falls through to "not protected" without throwing.

Notes (non-blocking)

Dewey's gap: no test raises a revoke of the assistant as the chief. I agree it doesn't block. #hardWait has no raiser branch, and the chief exemption in #protectedEnd is one line shared by both paths, so m7 kills it through test 1. Row 155's brief (b05de8258) now adds that test and refuses a writer that gives another instance a definition in END_PROTECTED, which closes the window Dewey names (a chief-raised, arbiter-resolved revoke passing after the target became the assistant).
The status line doesn't say who approved the 1.6 wording. Each earlier version names its approval; 1.6 names Jason's ruling and says nothing about the text. Per sage-0545, Mos approved it. Nothing the line says is false, so I'm not counting it as a finding, but Sage may want the approval on the record in the next version.
Assistant execution still refuses not-held and decision-mismatch until row 155, as the PRD notes, the README and the tests all say. The harness end_run description (tools.mjs:158) is stale, outside this candidate; row 155 owns it (sage-0539).
business classify (resolve.mjs) takes no target, so the WebUI's per-action authority view can show role.revoke as within-role or cross-role for a granted role, where the broker makes a revoke of the assistant a hard wait. It routes nothing. Dewey lists it.

What I ran and what I took from receipts

I ran, under the slot Sage gave in sage-0552, each file singly on the candidate from 19:21:10Z to 19:21:30Z, with Docker disabled and TMPDIR set to scratch. All had 0 fail and 0 skipped:

Test file	Pass
bus hard-waits	12
bus chief-of-staff	13
bus requirements	3
bus broker	16
business hard-waits	3
harness runner	24
tasks requirements	3
round 1 bus hard-waits (control, on my round 1 rebuild)	7

The control shows the round 1 file had the 7 tests, so the five Q169 tests are additions. I ran no suite, gate or mutant.

From Dewey's receipts, not rerun by me (r2/gate/summary.txt, r2/mutants/summary.txt, BUILD.md):

The gate: all 14 runs rc=0 from 19:06:10Z to 19:08:58Z, including land-work 86 passed with both not-human cases, bus 306/306, business 112/112, harness 105/105 and tasks 97/97.
Mutants m1 to m9 all killed, from 19:09:11Z to 19:10:46Z.
After the sage-0545 sentence edit, bus and tasks requirements 3/3 each at 19:15:11Z.

6.6 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History