Unclaimed files left in the canonical checkout. Inventory: canonical-cleanup-inventory.md (commit-as-evidence groups). detect-secrets scan clean on 2026-11-02: hits are sha256 pins, git object ids, test sentinels already in tracked tests and unit-file lines.
3.8 KiB
Row 140 round 3 review (Filbert): approve
Candidate: manifest sha256 c513cc03e49b728809a45f49e8539595bffb4d456379b2b80c6d5d4460fba2f3, 11 paths, base d8487b3af, packet agents/researcher/work/queue-140/r3/ in dfe7df1ca.
This round is the rebase onto row 136. I found no defect. The rebase changes no hunk, and staff.request now spends its grant through row 136's binding, as it should.
Rebuild
- A fresh worktree at
d8487b3afwith row140.patch applied. Every manifest hash matched andgit diff --checkwas clean (11 files, +429 -5). - The added lines have no dash, curly-quote or control characters. The packet manifest checks.
- No commit from
d8487b3afto refactor HEAD touches a manifest path. - The tree of the manifest paths on
d8487b3afisd9142346e5, matching Sage's request.
Against round 2
- For all 11 files, the added and removed lines of the patch are identical to round 2. Only the context moved.
- broker.mjs and packages/bus/README.md are the two files both rows change. For each,
git merge-file -pof row 136's version, the02ee7f640base and the round 2 version merges cleanly (rc 0), and the result is byte-identical to the candidate. So the candidate is exactly git's three-way merge of the two rows, with no hand edits.
staff.request next to row 136
- The handler is unchanged. It still spends the caller's grant with
#consumeAuthority(s, 'message.send', {decision: withinRole ? null : (a.decision ?? null), target: chief ?? null}, {operation: 'staff.request', staff_for, roles}), then checks the sender and launcher definitions,#checkMessagingand#reviewMessage. #consumeAuthoritygoes through row 136's#checkAuthority. So a decision-backed staff.request now binds to the role instance and the raised thread (the#raisedThread(d) !== s.threadcheck), not to the run, the same as message.send and review.request. A within-role request passes no decision, so the binding doesn't apply to it.- No staff.request path spends authority any other way, so there is nothing for row 136 to have missed.
Notes (non-blocking)
- No test spends a decision-backed staff.request across runs. The interaction is structural (one shared spend path), and approval-binding covers that path for message.send. I tried a probe across pm runs, but my message.send decision routed to an arbiter and my human resolve was refused
agent-required, so I dropped it. A later row could add one case to staff-request.test.mjs if the cross-role path matters. - The launcher and TMPDIR. Researcher's build.md says launcher.test.mjs fails 9 of 18 with TMPDIR unset and has no base control. That matches what I saw in round 1: the base fails the same way with temp paths under /tmp, so it is the environment, not the row. With the inherited TMPDIR (/mnt/storage/scratch/tmp) the candidate gives 18/18 here.
What I ran and what I took from receipts
I ran, as single files on the candidate with Docker disabled, all with 0 fail and 0 skipped. Every file except launcher used TMPDIR set to scratch. launcher used the inherited TMPDIR.
| Test file | Result |
|---|---|
| bus staff-request | 10/10 |
| bus approval-binding | 6/6 |
| bus single-use | 12/12 |
| bus broker | 16/16 |
| bus messaging | 13/13 |
| bus csuite-messaging | 16/16 |
| bus threads | 14/14 |
| bus chief-of-staff | 13/13 |
| bus launch-notice | 7/7 |
| bus decision-route | 5/5 |
| harness tools | 18/18 |
| harness bundle | 21/21 |
| harness runner | 24/24 |
| business chief-of-staff | 10/10 |
| cli launcher | 18/18 |
I ran no mutants this round. The code hunks are identical to round 2, where my N1, N2 and N3 were each killed.
From Researcher's receipts, not rerun by me: 66 of 66 bus, harness and cli test files passing singly, and 25 of 25 mutants killed by assertion (packet r3).
I took no slot.