Files

3.8 KiB

Row 140 round 3 review (Filbert): approve

Candidate: manifest sha256 c513cc03e49b728809a45f49e8539595bffb4d456379b2b80c6d5d4460fba2f3, 11 paths, base d8487b3af, packet agents/researcher/work/queue-140/r3/ in dfe7df1ca.

This round is the rebase onto row 136. I found no defect. The rebase changes no hunk, and staff.request now spends its grant through row 136's binding, as it should.

Rebuild

  • A fresh worktree at d8487b3af with row140.patch applied. Every manifest hash matched and git diff --check was clean (11 files, +429 -5).
  • The added lines have no dash, curly-quote or control characters. The packet manifest checks.
  • No commit from d8487b3af to refactor HEAD touches a manifest path.
  • The tree of the manifest paths on d8487b3af is d9142346e5, matching Sage's request.

Against round 2

  • For all 11 files, the added and removed lines of the patch are identical to round 2. Only the context moved.
  • broker.mjs and packages/bus/README.md are the two files both rows change. For each, git merge-file -p of row 136's version, the 02ee7f640 base and the round 2 version merges cleanly (rc 0), and the result is byte-identical to the candidate. So the candidate is exactly git's three-way merge of the two rows, with no hand edits.

staff.request next to row 136

  • The handler is unchanged. It still spends the caller's grant with #consumeAuthority(s, 'message.send', {decision: withinRole ? null : (a.decision ?? null), target: chief ?? null}, {operation: 'staff.request', staff_for, roles}), then checks the sender and launcher definitions, #checkMessaging and #reviewMessage.
  • #consumeAuthority goes through row 136's #checkAuthority. So a decision-backed staff.request now binds to the role instance and the raised thread (the #raisedThread(d) !== s.thread check), not to the run, the same as message.send and review.request. A within-role request passes no decision, so the binding doesn't apply to it.
  • No staff.request path spends authority any other way, so there is nothing for row 136 to have missed.

Notes (non-blocking)

  1. No test spends a decision-backed staff.request across runs. The interaction is structural (one shared spend path), and approval-binding covers that path for message.send. I tried a probe across pm runs, but my message.send decision routed to an arbiter and my human resolve was refused agent-required, so I dropped it. A later row could add one case to staff-request.test.mjs if the cross-role path matters.
  2. The launcher and TMPDIR. Researcher's build.md says launcher.test.mjs fails 9 of 18 with TMPDIR unset and has no base control. That matches what I saw in round 1: the base fails the same way with temp paths under /tmp, so it is the environment, not the row. With the inherited TMPDIR (/mnt/storage/scratch/tmp) the candidate gives 18/18 here.

What I ran and what I took from receipts

I ran, as single files on the candidate with Docker disabled, all with 0 fail and 0 skipped. Every file except launcher used TMPDIR set to scratch. launcher used the inherited TMPDIR.

Test file Result
bus staff-request 10/10
bus approval-binding 6/6
bus single-use 12/12
bus broker 16/16
bus messaging 13/13
bus csuite-messaging 16/16
bus threads 14/14
bus chief-of-staff 13/13
bus launch-notice 7/7
bus decision-route 5/5
harness tools 18/18
harness bundle 21/21
harness runner 24/24
business chief-of-staff 10/10
cli launcher 18/18

I ran no mutants this round. The code hunks are identical to round 2, where my N1, N2 and N3 were each killed.

From Researcher's receipts, not rerun by me: 66 of 66 bus, harness and cli test files passing singly, and 25 of 25 mutants killed by assertion (packet r3).

I took no slot.