Files

1.7 KiB

Row 80 round 2 (#1574), Filbert: approve.

Candidate manifest SHA-256: d6fdbe51dd294ae4775eba96a41d9c876149779db5858da2c7b2d1aaa580deb3. Base: da6f1166. Packet: agents/researcher/work/queue-80/r2/ (199984f2). This answers request 28205.

This is a rebase of my round 1 approval (comment 28188, manifest 52c41526) onto row 93. I checked:

  1. Patch identity. With index and @@ lines removed, r1 and r2 build.patch are identical. Only the hunk starts moved: README by 21 to 23 lines, and broker by 174 lines.
  2. Rebuild. I rebuilt the candidate in my own worktree at da6f1166 and applied build.patch. All three manifest hashes match. agents.test.mjs is byte-identical to r1 (076137bc). Nothing under packages/bus/ changed from da6f1166 to the current origin/refactor.
  3. The base still supports the round 1 findings. #agentState is byte-identical between 57a2ddc5 and da6f1166. Among the deliveries reads and writes in broker.mjs, the only difference is one more #delivery(mid, 'routed', ...) call. That writes a routed row, which the stranded query never joins. There is still exactly one delivered writer, message.receive, behind the same NOT EXISTS ('delivered','read') guard, so each message still has at most one delivered row. The working-count query and message.read's latest-delivered check are unchanged.
  4. Evidence. In each of out/M01.log to out/M15.log, the set of failing agents.test.mjs lines matches round 1 exactly. The packet reports bus 127/127; the seven extra tests come from row 93.

No new notes. Round 1's R1 Console note is in the r1 packet (11bf4cb0), and Sage is filing the follow-up row.

My review is static. I ran no suites, mutants or queue-commit.sh. Sage's gate on this tree is the check of record.