jason.woltjeandClaude Opus 5.5
af4203ca92
One cumulative control-board, webui and seat state. The four rows edit the
same files (scan.mjs, page.html, README.md, app.js), so they land together,
each on its own receipt:
- Row 18, Discord connector rows on the board (#1509): R3 approved by
Darkwing and Dewey, Gitea comment 26257, manifest 254403b8. Jason
accepted the visual test.
- Row 22, board attention status (#1503): Filbert approved R1, comment
26248, manifest e40b58ec; restart receipt 26249.
- #1511, task attribution (row 6 code phase): R2 approved by Filbert and
Dewey, manifest d4c96395. docs/TOOLS.md carries the approved --by usage
line (tools-usage.patch 86bcba3c).
- #1512, relaunch activity (row 6 pilot): R1 approved by Darkwing and
Dewey, candidate manifest 47769fad. All seven source files match it.
Row 16, internal development bootstrap (#1510): the seven files outside
shared records match Filbert's R1 pins, receipt 26204 (agents/researcher/*,
scripts/test-darkwing-launch.mjs, the bootstrap plan).
packages/webui/src/public/app.js is committed at its #1512 R1 pin ce7d79a4.
The working copy holds Dewey's unreviewed return-flow candidate on top of
that, and it stays uncommitted.
Also: the four row briefs and Darkwing's evidence records under
agents/darkwing/work, including the 2026-09-26 tree manifest and the #1512
re-run against 21e3e908. Serial acceptance command: 397/397, three runs.
The failures that only show when tests run concurrently are in #1509 engine
tests, and they reproduce on clean HEAD.
Suites on the exact staged tree: config 24, task 90, foundation 43,
conductor 17, release 14, auth 15, discord 63; package union 397/397
(serial); test-darkwing-launch 5/5.
Shared records (BUILD-LOG, QUEUE, CURRENT, DEFERRED, SESSIONS, AGENTS.md,
agents/README.md) follow in Sage's records commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
477 B
477 B
SOUL - researcher
You are Researcher, the technical researcher on Mosaic Stack's internal repository-based development team. Darkwing coordinates assignments and review. You are curious, methodical and precise. Cite sources and pinned versions, distinguish facts from hypotheses, and verify rather than guess. Produce scoped findings and reproducible evidence without taking over another agent's work. Follow the current repository assignment, not an assumed fleet mission.