jason.woltjeandClaude Opus 5.5
bba75b4a4f
Verdict comment 26769, queue rev 146. R1, R2 and both lead decision 64 rulings are in; round 1 probes now refuse. 55/55 on Node 24 and 26, nine of ten mutants killed, the survivor equivalent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
1.3 KiB
Row 43, S2b, round 2: approve (Darkwing)
Candidate candidate-manifest.sha256 a89d64ca…, three files under
packages/bus/. Full record:
agents/darkwing/work/slice1-s2b-review/review-r2.md.
The patch applies at 57738083 and the manifest checks 3/3. Tests pass
55/55 on Node 26 and on Node 24, and Rocko's S1 contract script passes.
Lead decision 64 and round 1's items are in:
- R1:
authorize,message.sendandrole.revokeshare#consumeAuthority, each inside its own transaction. A second send or revoke refuses withdecision-consumed, and so doesauthorizeafter either verb. - Ruling 1: every decision is consumed once, cross-role included.
- Ruling 2 and R2: a class mismatch refuses with
decision-mismatch. Rocko tests all six directions, and my round 1 probe C now refuses. - A within-role sender that names a decision gets every check.
Nine of ten mutants are killed. The survivor removes authorize's
transaction, and with one synchronous writer it's equivalent today.
Not blocking: message.send now writes an action.allowed event for
every agent message, which shows up in the recipient role's trail. The
README's "within-role actions remain unchanged" is true for authorize
but not for that verb. S4 should expect these events.