jason.woltjeandClaude Opus 5.5
ac4a6499f2
Verdict comment 26778, queue rev 156. Within-role citations never reach the authority check or the grant event; other sends keep S2b. 58/58 on Node 24 and 26, seven of seven mutants killed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
1.4 KiB
Row 44, S2c, round 1: approve (Darkwing)
Candidate candidate-manifest.sha256 aa249ad9…, three files under
packages/bus/. Full record:
agents/darkwing/work/slice1-s2c-review/review-r1.md.
The patch applies at 83cfd18c and the manifest checks 3/3. Tests pass
58/58 on Node 26 and on Node 24.
- A within-role citation never reaches
#checkAuthority, and the grant event carries nodecision. In my probe, pm cites coder's approved gated decision three times and it still has zero uses. coder then uses it once. - Policy decides within-role, from the session's role. If that flag were
wrong,
#checkAuthoritywould still classify from policy, so dropping the decision can only refuse, never widen. - Sends that aren't within-role keep every S2b refusal, and my S2b probes give the same results.
- The README wording is fixed.
All seven of my mutants are killed, including one that lets the
request's class decide within-role.
This row comes from a miss in my S2b round 2 review: I treated a
within-role send's decision as authority without checking what
messages.decision means to the trail. Dewey caught it.
Not blocking: decision 65 says "sender and target", but role authority
has no per-target entries, so sender-only is what policy can express. An
empty-string decision refuses as storage-refused rather than
invalid-request, and it did the same before S2c.