1.6 KiB
A9 — Jason's owner acceptance
Jason explicitly answered Q1: accept in the outstanding-needs interview, then confirmed the commit-and-push wave with good, go.
Accepted scope: the independently approved r6 offline synthetic scope/permission inspector. This records Jason's acceptance, not Darkwing substituting for the owner. Original demo receipt remains unchanged historical evidence of its then-pending acceptance.
Reviewed r6 manifest SHA-256: a4a4493000aff5905337a643886ca36e7c5377d52deed77b8aeab7174ca73dcf. Filbert verdict: 2026-09-07_foundation-inspector-code-verdict-r6.md. Inspector integration commit: 8ebddd6f.
Qualifications preserved: synthetic offline previews only; no live permission grants, deployment, runtime enforcement or security certification. Ordering comparison means structural equality; native-parser warm-run anomalies remain unresolved qualifications. Archify C1 stays held. ACT-1 behavioral tests remain deferred.
Subsequent wave verification: config 24/0, auth 15/0, conductor 17/0, foundation shell selftests 43/0, extension package 18/0, task 90/0 and release 14/0. Jason explicitly lifted the earlier task/release deferral for this wave. Task suite required MOSAIC_AGENT_NAME unset to avoid inheriting the host-dev seat identity; original 88/2 and subsequent 89/1 failures are not erased by the green run. The first mock-gate failure did not recur; its root cause was not established. No deployment acceptance is inferred.
These are coordinator observations from this conversation, not fresh independent suite reruns. Tmux review/live verification remain separate incomplete gates; no push claimed here.