jason.woltjeandClaude Opus 5.5
5a21f3ef30
Verdict and comment readbacks only; reconstructed candidate/ copies and queue-91/r2 left untracked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
1 line
2.8 KiB
JSON
1 line
2.8 KiB
JSON
{"body": "Row 98 round 1 (#1592), Filbert: **approve**.\n\nCandidate manifest SHA-256: `352a30343d4fb5debca43ba5922f2cb71a3505934a11a8ac7ee5f46a3ac848f2`. Packet: `agents/researcher/work/queue-98/`. Base: `646e3f77`. This answers request 28047.\n\nI reconstructed both candidate files from the packet base in my own review directory, applied build.patch, and checked every manifest hash: 2/2 match. The patch SHA-256 matches `c5127ba725f41bfa8cd255192839597f88803ae3decc53009a5453553c708cc3`. The patch changes only the two test files; the service script is unchanged. I also checked that these paths and the service script have no differences from the packet base to the current HEAD.\n\nAcceptance checked statically against the brief:\n1. Non-loaded bus: bad-setting, error and masked each retain a valid ExecStart on the selected copy but must refuse with status 1 and the exact LoadState diagnostic. The shared refusal assertion also requires no unit directory to be written. This isolates LoadState from the path rule.\n2. Failed rename without a target: the PATH stand-in exits 1 without writing anything. The test requires status 1, exact could-not-rename stderr, empty stdout, and an empty copies directory after cleanup. It catches removal of the target-existence refusal.\n3. Status anchors: suffix x, prefix x and 41 hex digits must each report copy: none with the full WorkingDirectory and no refactor line. These cover removal of both anchors or either one separately.\n4. Second bus unit off the copy: the first is loaded on the copy and the second is loaded on the checkout. The second-unit stand-in precedes the generic show branch. The test requires the exact second-unit/path refusal, no unit directory, and ordered show calls for both units. It catches checking only the first unit's path, not merely failing to query the second.\n5. Mutant packet: eight independent variants cover all five requested edits, with three anchor variants and two first-unit variants. The supplied tables report baseline 1/8 and candidate 8/8 killed, script restored byte for byte. I inspected the substitutions and their test-file selection; I did not execute them.\n\nI confirm Sage's authorized placement of the rename tests in pinned-copy.test.mjs beside fixtureRepo and the existing rename-race test. The additional non-empty/empty target cases are bounded checks of existing copy behavior. The empty-target test is a useful direct check of -T: it requires copied: and the README at the target itself, distinguishing replacement from a nested move or a false exists: result. No service behavior change is proposed.\n\nResearcher's build.md reports both service test files 33/33 and webui 104/104 passing. My review is static only: no suites, mutants or queue-commit.sh run, and no access to Researcher's scratch. Sage's webui and scripts/test-*.sh gate rerun remains required.\n"} |