Jason Woltje
505b6f799c
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was canceled
Both python sites piped a status payload into `python3 - <<'PY'`. The heredoc binds stdin to the program text, so `json.load(sys.stdin)` saw EOF, the bare `except` fired, and the parser returned "unknown" for every input — success, pending and failure alike. "unknown" then reaches a silent `exit 0` arm. Consequence: the gate-6 queue guard has never made a determination. It exits 0 on every invocation, on both the gitea and github paths (one shared parser). The pending wait loop, --require-status and the 124 timeout were all unreachable code. What it still validated was connectivity — an unresolved token, head sha, or platform could exit 1. Fix is the one already shipped in the sibling: capture the payload with `payload=$(cat)` before invoking python, pass it by environment. pr-ci-wait.sh:38 has carried a comment describing this exact bug — "yielding EOF and returning unknown every time" — along with the remedy. It was never backported to the sibling the constitution makes mandatory before every push and merge. Adds test-ci-queue-wait-parse.sh, enumerated in test:framework-shell. Every assertion is on the RETURNED STATE STRING; a suite asserting only rc=0 passes against the broken build, which is how this survived. Verified by mutation: against the pre-fix wrapper the suite fails 10 of 14, and the four that pass are the four for which passing is correct (the undecodable-input control, the unknown-vocabulary case, and both needle halves). The needle scans with heredoc semantics rather than matching text. `json.load(sys.stdin)` is correct under `python3 -c`, where the program comes from argv and stdin really is the payload — ci-queue-wait.sh uses that form legitimately in gitea_get_branch_head_sha. A flat grep flags that innocent site; the scanner names only the two defective ones. Out of scope, deliberately, and recorded on #1019: token-in-argv (ps-visible) and the hardcoded BRANCH="main". Bundling them would make a safety-critical parse fix harder to review. Refs #1019