stack/docs/plans/reviews/2026-09-07_issue53-inclusion-draft.md

Issue #53 inclusion — preparation, not closure evidence yet

Source: mosaicstack/stack-v2#53 Title: Plan agent/project/workspace sessions and execution audit. Current API response: open, HTTP 200. Client exited 1 despite HTTP 200; parsed response supplied the issue identity/body. Do not count client exit as a clean success or retry the read blindly.

Issue is planning-only: reusable agents, project membership/RBAC, workspace membership/state, Resume/Fresh sessions and execution audit. Acceptance requires separated agreed requirements/proposals/questions, ownership/coverage boundaries, later independently reviewed mapping/gap-analysis gates, and owner phase review. Implemented runtime enforcement is NOT this issue's acceptance scope.

Candidate local mapping for detailed verification:

• Requirements and owner decisions: docs/plans/2026-09-06_agent-project-workspace-foundation.md.
• Proposed contract and coverage boundaries: docs/plans/2026-09-06_foundation-phase2-contract.md and docs/plans/foundation-v1-candidate/.
• Later map/gap gates: docs/plans/2026-09-06_foundation-map-handoff.md and docs/plans/2026-09-06_foundation-technical-map.md.
• Phase acceptance history: docs/plans/CURRENT.md and append-only BUILD-LOG.md / docs/SESSIONS.md.

Local acceptance mapping checked:

• Agreed requirements: foundation plan section 2, line 31 onward; proposed record types explicitly separated in phase-2 contract section 2 (line 95 onward); open D1–D16 reconciliation in foundation-v1-candidate/REVIEW.md section at line 73.
• Ownership/limits: phase-2 contract section 3 (line 132 onward) catalogues record ownership; REVIEW.md D2/D9/D11/D13 explicitly retain loader/context, audit-integrity, command-coverage and privacy enforcement gaps rather than claiming runtime guarantees.
• Later gates: foundation plan section 8, lines 226–247, explicitly requires Archify independent review and Jason visual acceptance, a distinct non-author gap analyst and a different report reviewer.
• Owner phase review: foundation plan section 8 and phase-2 contract lines 3–4 record phase stops and Jason's explicit accept phase 2 checkpoint.

Tracked Git blob identities verified locally:

• foundation plan: 466717dc02db0d7c3c3efea98caee4a59ecf5cb6.
• phase-2 contract: 6fb7dca9874c9084a27e25adb4429a24c2b759e1.
• map handoff: 0efc06adaa6d7a041db3c5718d3ad72956ee758e.
• technical map: 6859884d38e3850434b80f7225eccba83a3a0db3.

These identities establish tracked local artifacts, not publication. Pushed-ref verification remains pending. A9 is a later inspector acceptance, not a substitute for #53 planning acceptance. Final record must cite exact pushed commit, verified remote ref and acceptance-specific passages. Jason will close the original issue after verification; Darkwing must not close or renumber it.