Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ESFAnh2t9HmLwng8oW95St
2533 lines
94 KiB
TypeScript
2533 lines
94 KiB
TypeScript
import { act } from 'react';
|
|
import { createRoot, type Root } from 'react-dom/client';
|
|
import { afterAll, afterEach, beforeAll, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
|
|
import { createFakeChatSocket, type EmittedEvent } from './test-support/fake-chat-socket';
|
|
import {
|
|
MAX_COMMAND_RESULTS,
|
|
MAX_EXECUTED_APPROVAL_IDS,
|
|
MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS,
|
|
MAX_MESSAGES,
|
|
MAX_STREAM_CHARS,
|
|
MAX_TOOLS,
|
|
} from './limits';
|
|
|
|
const { getSocketMock, destroySocketMock } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getSocketMock: vi.fn(),
|
|
destroySocketMock: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/socket', () => ({
|
|
getSocket: getSocketMock,
|
|
destroySocket: destroySocketMock,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
import type { ChatSendProtocol, HarnessSelection } from '@mosaicstack/types';
|
|
import { useChatConnection, type ChatConnectionValue } from './use-chat-connection';
|
|
|
|
let fake: ReturnType<typeof createFakeChatSocket>;
|
|
let latest: ChatConnectionValue | null;
|
|
let root: Root | null;
|
|
let container: HTMLElement | null;
|
|
|
|
function Harness(): null {
|
|
latest = useChatConnection();
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Task Five, Step Two (web send path) red-first support. These probe the FUTURE
|
|
* pi-rpc send contract against the CURRENT implementation, so the desired API is
|
|
* expressed here as a localized cast — production types stay untouched until Step
|
|
* Three. The reds fail on behaviour (legacy `message` emitted instead of
|
|
* `turn:send`; no nested selection; no idempotency key; void return; no
|
|
* conversation-id gating), never on a missing module or type.
|
|
*/
|
|
interface HarnessTurnSendInput {
|
|
readonly content: string;
|
|
readonly selection: HarnessSelection;
|
|
}
|
|
type HarnessSendMessage = (input: HarnessTurnSendInput) => boolean;
|
|
|
|
function harnessSend(): HarnessSendMessage {
|
|
return latest?.actions.sendMessage as unknown as HarnessSendMessage;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Task Five MAJOR-1 (browser send-protocol negotiation) support. The Gateway
|
|
* advertises how this connection may send via a server-to-client-only
|
|
* `chat:send-capability` (already part of the typed `ServerToClientEvents`
|
|
* contract, so this uses the fake's typed `serverEmit` — no cast); the hook
|
|
* holds the advertised protocol and routes `sendMessage` through an exhaustive
|
|
* switch on it, never inferring it from conversation/selection. When no listener
|
|
* is registered yet (CURRENT impl), the emit is an inert no-op, so the reds
|
|
* below fail on BEHAVIOUR — the current send path still infers a protocol and
|
|
* emits regardless of any advertisement — not on a missing module or type.
|
|
*/
|
|
function advertiseCapability(protocol: ChatSendProtocol, connectionId: string): void {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('chat:send-capability', { protocol, connectionId });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Install a controllable `crypto.randomUUID` on the global crypto object and
|
|
* return a restore fn. Uses defineProperty on the instance so it works whether
|
|
* or not the native method is configurable (it lives on the prototype, so an own
|
|
* property simply shadows it).
|
|
*/
|
|
function installRandomUUID(fn: () => string): () => void {
|
|
const g = globalThis as { crypto?: { randomUUID?: () => string } };
|
|
if (!g.crypto) {
|
|
Object.defineProperty(g, 'crypto', { configurable: true, writable: true, value: {} });
|
|
}
|
|
const cryptoObj = g.crypto as { randomUUID?: () => string };
|
|
const original = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(cryptoObj, 'randomUUID');
|
|
Object.defineProperty(cryptoObj, 'randomUUID', {
|
|
configurable: true,
|
|
writable: true,
|
|
value: fn,
|
|
});
|
|
return () => {
|
|
if (original) {
|
|
Object.defineProperty(cryptoObj, 'randomUUID', original);
|
|
} else {
|
|
Reflect.deleteProperty(cryptoObj, 'randomUUID');
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Force `crypto.randomUUID` to read as ABSENT by shadowing it with an own
|
|
* `undefined` property. The native method lives on `Crypto.prototype`, so a
|
|
* bare delete of the (non-existent) own property would leave the inherited
|
|
* method visible — the shadow is what actually makes the call site see no
|
|
* secure generator. Returns a restore fn.
|
|
*/
|
|
function removeRandomUUID(): () => void {
|
|
const g = globalThis as { crypto?: { randomUUID?: () => string } };
|
|
if (!g.crypto) {
|
|
Object.defineProperty(g, 'crypto', { configurable: true, writable: true, value: {} });
|
|
}
|
|
const cryptoObj = g.crypto as { randomUUID?: () => string };
|
|
const original = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(cryptoObj, 'randomUUID');
|
|
Object.defineProperty(cryptoObj, 'randomUUID', {
|
|
configurable: true,
|
|
writable: true,
|
|
value: undefined,
|
|
});
|
|
return () => {
|
|
if (original) {
|
|
Object.defineProperty(cryptoObj, 'randomUUID', original);
|
|
} else {
|
|
Reflect.deleteProperty(cryptoObj, 'randomUUID');
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Task Five, Step Two group 4/5 support — the FUTURE `turn:ack` receipt surface
|
|
* and the FUTURE fixed idempotency/rejection notice, expressed as a localized
|
|
* read-only view over `state`. Production `ChatConnectionState` gains
|
|
* `turnReceipt` at Step Three; the cast keeps production types untouched until
|
|
* then, so a success assertion against it fails on BEHAVIOUR (no turn:ack
|
|
* handler runs), never on a missing module. `error` already exists on state.
|
|
*/
|
|
interface HarnessTurnReceiptView {
|
|
readonly idempotencyKey: string;
|
|
readonly receiptId: string;
|
|
readonly selection: HarnessSelection;
|
|
}
|
|
interface HarnessTurnStateView {
|
|
readonly turnReceipt: HarnessTurnReceiptView | null | undefined;
|
|
readonly error: string | null;
|
|
}
|
|
function harnessTurnState(): HarnessTurnStateView {
|
|
return latest?.state as unknown as HarnessTurnStateView;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Emit a server `turn:ack` the CURRENT hook has no listener for — a safe no-op
|
|
* today (the fake iterates an empty handler set), so the group-4 reds fail
|
|
* because nothing is surfaced, not because this throws. The event name is cast
|
|
* past the compile-time `ServerToClientEvents` contract exactly as the
|
|
* `turn:send` client cast is; the typed event map lands at Step Three.
|
|
*/
|
|
function serverEmitTurnAck(payload: unknown): void {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('turn:ack' as unknown as Parameters<typeof fake.serverEmitRaw>[0], payload);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(() => {
|
|
Object.defineProperty(globalThis, 'IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT', {
|
|
configurable: true,
|
|
value: true,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterAll(() => {
|
|
Reflect.deleteProperty(globalThis, 'IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
fake = createFakeChatSocket();
|
|
getSocketMock.mockReset().mockReturnValue(fake.socket);
|
|
destroySocketMock.mockReset();
|
|
latest = null;
|
|
container = document.createElement('div');
|
|
document.body.append(container);
|
|
root = createRoot(container);
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
root?.render(<Harness />);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterEach(async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
root?.unmount();
|
|
});
|
|
document.body.replaceChildren();
|
|
root = null;
|
|
container = null;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('useChatConnection', () => {
|
|
// Task Five MAJOR-1: the send path is PROTOCOL-driven — `sendMessage` routes
|
|
// only on the negotiated `chat:send-capability`, never on inferred
|
|
// conversation/selection state. These pre-existing cases exercise the legacy
|
|
// `message` branch, so the connection is advertised `legacy-message` once here
|
|
// (server-to-client, for this exact socket id) after the mount registers its
|
|
// listener. Sub-describes that need the pi turn-runtime reset the generation
|
|
// and re-advertise `turn-send`; the capability describe resets to the
|
|
// unadvertised `unavailable` baseline and drives the protocol itself.
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('establishes the active conversation from the first message:ack when message omitted conversationId', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBe('c1');
|
|
expect(latest?.state.ack).toEqual({ conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ignores a message:ack for a different conversation once one is already active', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c2', messageId: 'm2' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBe('c1');
|
|
expect(latest?.state.ack).toEqual({ conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('accumulates streamed agent:text chunks in order for the active conversation', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'c1', text: 'Hel' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'c1', text: 'lo' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.text).toBe('Hello');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('filters out agent:text events for a conversation that is not active', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'c1', text: 'Hi' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'other', text: 'nope' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.text).toBe('Hi');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('accumulates streamed agent:thinking text for the active conversation', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:thinking', { conversationId: 'c1', text: 'step one. ' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:thinking', { conversationId: 'c1', text: 'step two.' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.thinking).toBe('step one. step two.');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('tracks a tool call from start through a successful end', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:tool:start', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: 't1',
|
|
toolName: 'search',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools).toEqual([
|
|
{ toolCallId: 't1', toolName: 'search', status: 'running' },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:tool:end', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: 't1',
|
|
toolName: 'search',
|
|
isError: false,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools).toEqual([
|
|
{ toolCallId: 't1', toolName: 'search', status: 'success' },
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('tracks a tool call that ends in error', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:tool:start', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: 't1',
|
|
toolName: 'shell',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:tool:end', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: 't1',
|
|
toolName: 'shell',
|
|
isError: true,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools).toEqual([{ toolCallId: 't1', toolName: 'shell', status: 'error' }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('finalizes the streamed response into the transcript and captures usage on agent:end', async () => {
|
|
const usage = {
|
|
provider: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
thinkingLevel: 'medium',
|
|
tokens: { input: 10, output: 20, cacheRead: 0, cacheWrite: 0, total: 30 },
|
|
cost: 0.01,
|
|
context: { percent: 5, window: 200000 },
|
|
};
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'c1', text: 'Hello there' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1', usage });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.text).toBe('');
|
|
expect(latest?.state.usage).toEqual(usage);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.at(-1)).toMatchObject({ role: 'assistant', text: 'Hello there' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('records session:info including thinking controls and routing decision', async () => {
|
|
const sessionInfo = {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
provider: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
thinkingLevel: 'medium',
|
|
availableThinkingLevels: ['low', 'medium', 'high'],
|
|
routingDecision: {
|
|
model: 'claude',
|
|
provider: 'anthropic',
|
|
ruleName: 'default',
|
|
reason: 'default route',
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('session:info', sessionInfo);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sessionInfo).toEqual(sessionInfo);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('records the commands manifest regardless of active conversation', async () => {
|
|
const manifest = {
|
|
commands: [],
|
|
skills: [],
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
};
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('commands:manifest', { manifest });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.manifest).toEqual(manifest);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('records a system:reload broadcast regardless of active conversation', async () => {
|
|
const reload = {
|
|
commands: [],
|
|
skills: [],
|
|
providers: ['anthropic'],
|
|
message: 'Commands reloaded',
|
|
};
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('system:reload', reload);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.systemReload).toEqual(reload);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('surfaces an error for the active conversation and filters one for another conversation', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('error', { conversationId: 'other', error: 'ignored' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe(null);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('error', { conversationId: 'c1', error: 'boom' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe('boom');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('records a failed command:result for the active conversation', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:result', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'model',
|
|
success: false,
|
|
message: 'unknown model',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.commandResults).toEqual([
|
|
{ conversationId: 'c1', command: 'model', success: false, message: 'unknown model' },
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('bounds an oversized command:result message to a fixed cap before it ever reaches state', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const hostileMessage = 'x'.repeat(50_000);
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:result', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'model',
|
|
success: false,
|
|
message: hostileMessage,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const stored = latest?.state.commandResults.at(-1)?.message ?? '';
|
|
expect(stored.length).toBeLessThan(hostileMessage.length);
|
|
expect(stored.length).toBeLessThanOrEqual(1000);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('pairs a successful command:approval with the pending request so it can be run with its approvalId', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'command:approve',
|
|
payload: { conversationId: 'c1', command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:approval', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'deploy',
|
|
success: true,
|
|
approvalId: 'ap1',
|
|
expiresAt: '2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approval?.approvalId).toBe('ap1');
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.runApprovedCommand();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'command:execute',
|
|
payload: { conversationId: 'c1', command: 'deploy', args: 'prod', approvalId: 'ap1' },
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('sendMessage emits optional conversationId/provider/modelId and appends an optimistic user turn', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({
|
|
content: 'hello',
|
|
selection: { harnessId: 'pi', providerId: 'anthropic', modelId: 'claude' },
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'message',
|
|
payload: {
|
|
conversationId: undefined,
|
|
content: 'hello',
|
|
provider: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.at(-1)).toMatchObject({ role: 'user', text: 'hello' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('sendMessage includes the active conversationId once established', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'again' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'message',
|
|
payload: { conversationId: 'c1', content: 'again', provider: undefined, modelId: undefined },
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('turn:send harness routing (Task Five, Step Two red-first)', () => {
|
|
const selection: HarnessSelection = {
|
|
harnessId: 'pi',
|
|
providerId: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
};
|
|
const UUID = 'aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa';
|
|
|
|
// The pi turn-runtime routes sends through `turn:send`. Reset the generation
|
|
// (clearing the outer `legacy-message` advertisement + first-wins lock) and
|
|
// advertise `turn-send` for this exact connection, so every send below takes
|
|
// the turn-runtime branch.
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateReconnect();
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('turn-send', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
async function establishConversation(): Promise<void> {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it('emits a single turn:send with the nested selection tuple and a UUID idempotencyKey — never the legacy message event', async () => {
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
try {
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'hello', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const sends = fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'turn:send');
|
|
expect(sends).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(sends[0]?.payload).toEqual({
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
content: 'hello',
|
|
selection,
|
|
idempotencyKey: UUID,
|
|
});
|
|
// The pi-rpc sender must not fall back to the embedded `message` event.
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'message')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('generates the idempotencyKey with exactly one crypto.randomUUID() call per accepted send', async () => {
|
|
const gen = vi.fn(() => UUID);
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(gen);
|
|
try {
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'first', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'second', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(gen).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
const keys = fake.emitted
|
|
.filter((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')
|
|
.map((e) => (e.payload as { idempotencyKey: string }).idempotencyKey);
|
|
expect(keys).toEqual([UUID, UUID]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('does not send before an active conversation id exists (no first-send auto-create)', async () => {
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
let returned: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
returned = harnessSend()({ content: 'too early', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(returned).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'message')).toBe(false);
|
|
// Nothing optimistically appended when the send is refused.
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'too early')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('returns true when it emits and false when the send is refused', async () => {
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
let refusedEarly: boolean | undefined;
|
|
let acceptedAfter: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
refusedEarly = harnessSend()({ content: 'early', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
acceptedAfter = harnessSend()({ content: 'now', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(refusedEarly).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(acceptedAfter).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('when secure UUID generation throws: emits nothing, appends nothing, releases the lock, and a later send succeeds', async () => {
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
|
|
const failing = installRandomUUID(() => {
|
|
throw new Error('secure random unavailable');
|
|
});
|
|
let firstReturn: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
firstReturn = harnessSend()({ content: 'blocked', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
failing();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(firstReturn).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'blocked')).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// The send lock must have been released, so a subsequent valid send works.
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
let secondReturn: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
secondReturn = harnessSend()({ content: 'retry', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(secondReturn).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('turn:ack receipt + rejection contract (Task Five, Step Two group 4)', () => {
|
|
const selection: HarnessSelection = {
|
|
harnessId: 'pi',
|
|
providerId: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
};
|
|
const UUID = 'aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa';
|
|
|
|
// turn:ack is the receipt for a `turn:send`, so these establish under the pi
|
|
// turn-runtime: reset the generation (clearing the outer `legacy-message`
|
|
// advertisement + lock) and advertise `turn-send` for this connection.
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateReconnect();
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('turn-send', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Establish the conversation and send one accepted turn under a controlled
|
|
// idempotency key. Returns the crypto restore fn so callers unwind it.
|
|
async function establishAndSend(): Promise<() => void> {
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'hello', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
return restore;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it('surfaces a turn:ack receipt echoing the exact idempotencyKey, server receiptId, and requested selection tuple', async () => {
|
|
const restore = await establishAndSend();
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
serverEmitTurnAck({
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
idempotencyKey: UUID,
|
|
receiptId: 'r1',
|
|
selection,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// RED anchor: no turn:ack handler exists, so nothing is recorded. Green
|
|
// only when Step Three echoes the exact tuple back into state — never a
|
|
// substituted or fabricated one.
|
|
expect(harnessTurnState().turnReceipt).toEqual({
|
|
idempotencyKey: UUID,
|
|
receiptId: 'r1',
|
|
selection,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('on a rejected turn:ack surfaces a visible safe notice, never the raw internal error, and fabricates no receipt tuple', async () => {
|
|
const restore = await establishAndSend();
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
serverEmitTurnAck({
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
idempotencyKey: UUID,
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'runtime_unsupported',
|
|
error: 'ADAPTER_BOOM internal stack: pi adapter unavailable at 0xdeadbeef',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// RED anchor: a rejected ack must surface a visible notice; today no
|
|
// handler runs, so state.error stays null.
|
|
expect(harnessTurnState().error).toBeTruthy();
|
|
// The raw internal exception text must never reach the browser surface.
|
|
expect(harnessTurnState().error ?? '').not.toContain('ADAPTER_BOOM');
|
|
expect(harnessTurnState().error ?? '').not.toContain('0xdeadbeef');
|
|
// A rejection must not fabricate a success receipt tuple.
|
|
expect(harnessTurnState().turnReceipt ?? null).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('uses one fixed safe rejection notice regardless of the internal cause (frozen union, not a passthrough)', async () => {
|
|
const firstRestore = await establishAndSend();
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
serverEmitTurnAck({
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
idempotencyKey: UUID,
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'runtime_unsupported',
|
|
error: 'cause-ALPHA adapter_unavailable',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
firstRestore();
|
|
}
|
|
const firstNotice = harnessTurnState().error;
|
|
|
|
// A fresh turn on the same conversation, rejected for a DIFFERENT internal
|
|
// reason, must surface the identical fixed notice.
|
|
const secondRestore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'again', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
serverEmitTurnAck({
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
idempotencyKey: UUID,
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'runtime_unsupported',
|
|
error: 'cause-BRAVO conversation_service_unavailable',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
secondRestore();
|
|
}
|
|
const secondNotice = harnessTurnState().error;
|
|
|
|
// RED anchor: both are null today; green requires a single frozen safe
|
|
// string surfaced for both distinct internal causes.
|
|
expect(firstNotice).toBeTruthy();
|
|
expect(secondNotice).toBeTruthy();
|
|
expect(firstNotice).toBe(secondNotice);
|
|
expect(firstNotice ?? '').not.toContain('ALPHA');
|
|
expect(secondNotice ?? '').not.toContain('BRAVO');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('idempotency-key failure semantics (Task Five, Step Two group 5)', () => {
|
|
const selection: HarnessSelection = {
|
|
harnessId: 'pi',
|
|
providerId: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
};
|
|
const UUID_A = '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111';
|
|
const UUID_B = '22222222-2222-4222-9222-222222222222';
|
|
const UUID_V4 = /^[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-4[0-9a-f]{3}-[89ab][0-9a-f]{3}-[0-9a-f]{12}$/i;
|
|
|
|
// The idempotency key is minted only on the pi turn-runtime `turn:send`
|
|
// branch: reset the generation (clearing the outer `legacy-message`
|
|
// advertisement + lock) and advertise `turn-send` for this connection.
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateReconnect();
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('turn-send', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
async function establish(): Promise<void> {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it('mints a DISTINCT UUID-v4 idempotencyKey for each of two accepted turns — a key is never reused across turns', async () => {
|
|
const keys = [UUID_A, UUID_B];
|
|
let call = 0;
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => keys[call++] ?? UUID_A);
|
|
try {
|
|
await establish();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'first', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'second', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const sent = fake.emitted
|
|
.filter((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')
|
|
.map((e) => (e.payload as { idempotencyKey: string }).idempotencyKey);
|
|
// RED anchor: current sendMessage emits the legacy `message`, so no
|
|
// turn:send keys exist at all.
|
|
expect(sent).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(sent[0]).toMatch(UUID_V4);
|
|
expect(sent[1]).toMatch(UUID_V4);
|
|
expect(sent[0]).not.toBe(sent[1]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('when crypto.randomUUID is ABSENT: surfaces a visible fixed idempotency-unavailable notice, emits nothing, appends nothing, releases the lock synchronously, and a later valid send succeeds', async () => {
|
|
await establish();
|
|
|
|
const restoreCrypto = removeRandomUUID();
|
|
let firstReturn: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
firstReturn = harnessSend()({ content: 'no-secure-random', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restoreCrypto();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// RED anchors: a refused send returns false and surfaces a visible notice.
|
|
expect(firstReturn).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(harnessTurnState().error).toBeTruthy();
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'no-secure-random')).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// The lock released synchronously (no server event needed): a later valid
|
|
// send goes through.
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID_A);
|
|
let secondReturn: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
secondReturn = harnessSend()({ content: 'recovered', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
expect(secondReturn).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('surfaces the SAME fixed idempotency-unavailable notice whether randomUUID is absent or throws, never leaking the thrown message', async () => {
|
|
// Case 1: absent.
|
|
await establish();
|
|
const restoreAbsent = removeRandomUUID();
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'absent', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restoreAbsent();
|
|
}
|
|
const absentNotice = harnessTurnState().error;
|
|
|
|
// Case 2: throws with a distinctive internal message.
|
|
const failing = installRandomUUID(() => {
|
|
throw new Error('SECURE_RANDOM_BOOM entropy pool drained');
|
|
});
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'throws', selection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
failing();
|
|
}
|
|
const throwNotice = harnessTurnState().error;
|
|
|
|
// RED anchor: both are null today.
|
|
expect(absentNotice).toBeTruthy();
|
|
expect(throwNotice).toBeTruthy();
|
|
expect(absentNotice).toBe(throwNotice);
|
|
// The thrown internal detail must never reach the browser surface.
|
|
expect(throwNotice ?? '').not.toContain('SECURE_RANDOM_BOOM');
|
|
expect(throwNotice ?? '').not.toContain('entropy pool');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('abort emits abort with the active conversationId', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.abort();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({ event: 'abort', payload: { conversationId: 'c1' } });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('setThinking emits set:thinking with the requested level and active conversationId', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.setThinking('high');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'set:thinking',
|
|
payload: { conversationId: 'c1', level: 'high' },
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('executeCommand emits command:execute with the exact command payload', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.executeCommand({ command: 'model', args: 'gpt-5' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'command:execute',
|
|
payload: { conversationId: 'c1', command: 'model', args: 'gpt-5' },
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('adopts session:info as the active conversation when it arrives before message:ack, preserving it across the later ack', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'hi' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('session:info', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
provider: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
thinkingLevel: 'medium',
|
|
availableThinkingLevels: ['low', 'medium', 'high'],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBe('c1');
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sessionInfo?.provider).toBe('anthropic');
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.ack).toEqual({ conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sessionInfo?.provider).toBe('anthropic');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('adopts a pre-ack error as the active conversation, surfaces it, and does not leave streaming stuck', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'hi' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('error', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
error: 'Failed to start agent session. Please try again.',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBe('c1');
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe('Failed to start agent session. Please try again.');
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'retry' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'retry')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('stops streaming when a typed error arrives mid-turn', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('error', { conversationId: 'c1', error: 'boom' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('does not append an assistant message on agent:end when there is no text or thinking', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
const before = latest?.state.messages.length ?? 0;
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.length).toBe(before);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ignores a second approval request while the first is still outstanding, preserving the original command and args', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'staging' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingApproval).toEqual({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'command:approve')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:approval', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'deploy',
|
|
success: true,
|
|
approvalId: 'ap1',
|
|
expiresAt: '2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.runApprovedCommand();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'command:execute',
|
|
payload: { conversationId: 'c1', command: 'deploy', args: 'prod', approvalId: 'ap1' },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'command:execute')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ignores a stale command:approval response that does not match the pending request', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:approval', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'rollback',
|
|
success: true,
|
|
approvalId: 'stale',
|
|
expiresAt: '2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approval).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('emits command:execute only once even when runApprovedCommand is invoked twice back to back', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:approval', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'deploy',
|
|
success: true,
|
|
approvalId: 'ap1',
|
|
expiresAt: '2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.runApprovedCommand();
|
|
latest?.actions.runApprovedCommand();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'command:execute')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approval).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingApproval).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ignores sendMessage while a turn is streaming', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'too soon' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'too soon')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('refreshes the manifest commands from a system:reload broadcast', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('commands:manifest', {
|
|
manifest: {
|
|
commands: [
|
|
{
|
|
name: 'model',
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
description: 'old',
|
|
scope: 'core',
|
|
execution: 'socket',
|
|
available: true,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
skills: [],
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('system:reload', {
|
|
commands: [
|
|
{
|
|
name: 'deploy',
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
description: 'new',
|
|
scope: 'core',
|
|
execution: 'socket',
|
|
available: true,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
skills: [],
|
|
providers: ['anthropic'],
|
|
message: 'Commands reloaded',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.manifest?.commands.map((c) => c.name)).toEqual(['deploy']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('reconnects the same socket instance after a transient disconnect and accepts a subsequent ack/start/text stream', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateDisconnect();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Listeners must still be registered — a transient disconnect must not
|
|
// tear anything down or force a fresh singleton.
|
|
expect(fake.listeners.get('message:ack')?.size).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateReconnect();
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.socket.connected).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm2' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'c1', text: 'reconnected' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.ack).toEqual({ conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm2' });
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.text).toBe('reconnected');
|
|
expect(fake.listeners.get('message:ack')?.size).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
// No new fake singleton was created — getSocket() always resolved to the
|
|
// same instance across the disconnect/reconnect cycle.
|
|
expect(getSocketMock.mock.results.every((result) => result.value === fake.socket)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('resets streaming and pending-send/busy state on a mid-stream disconnect', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'hi' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approvalRequestPending).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateDisconnect();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approvalRequestPending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// The send lock must also be released — a subsequent sendMessage after
|
|
// reconnect must not be permanently blocked by the interrupted turn. The
|
|
// disconnect also voids the negotiated send protocol (MAJOR-1), so model the
|
|
// reconnect handshake — the socket reconnects and the server re-advertises
|
|
// how this connection may send — before probing the released lock.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateReconnect();
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'after reconnect' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message').at(-1)).toEqual({
|
|
event: 'message',
|
|
payload: {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
content: 'after reconnect',
|
|
provider: undefined,
|
|
modelId: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('emits and appends only one turn when sendMessage is called twice before agent:start, and cannot fork a new conversation', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'first' });
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'second' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages[0]).toMatchObject({ role: 'user', text: 'first' });
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBe('c1');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('appends a terminal anomaly entry when agent:tool:end references a toolCallId that was never started', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:tool:end', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: 'unseen',
|
|
toolName: 'search',
|
|
isError: false,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools).toEqual([
|
|
{ toolCallId: 'unseen', toolName: 'search', status: 'anomaly' },
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('assigns unique fallback IDs to multiple malformed tool:start events, and a subsequent malformed tool:end always appends a new anomaly without mutating either prior entry', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('agent:tool:start', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: { bad: 'object' },
|
|
toolName: 'search',
|
|
});
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('agent:tool:start', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: '',
|
|
toolName: 'shell',
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
const [first, second] = latest?.state.tools ?? [];
|
|
expect(first?.status).toBe('running');
|
|
expect(second?.status).toBe('running');
|
|
expect(first?.toolCallId).not.toBe(second?.toolCallId);
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('agent:tool:end', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: null,
|
|
toolName: 'unknown',
|
|
isError: false,
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools).toHaveLength(3);
|
|
// Neither malformed-start entry was mutated by the malformed end.
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools[0]).toEqual(first);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools[1]).toEqual(second);
|
|
// The malformed end always appends its own terminal anomaly rather than
|
|
// colliding with (and silently flipping) an earlier fallback ID.
|
|
const terminal = latest?.state.tools[2];
|
|
expect(terminal?.status).toBe('anomaly');
|
|
expect(terminal?.toolCallId).not.toBe(first?.toolCallId);
|
|
expect(terminal?.toolCallId).not.toBe(second?.toolCallId);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('updates only the first matching tool when a tool:end references a toolCallId shared by two tool:start entries', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:tool:start', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: 'dup',
|
|
toolName: 'search',
|
|
});
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:tool:start', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: 'dup',
|
|
toolName: 'search',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:tool:end', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: 'dup',
|
|
toolName: 'search',
|
|
isError: false,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools).toEqual([
|
|
{ toolCallId: 'dup', toolName: 'search', status: 'success' },
|
|
{ toolCallId: 'dup', toolName: 'search', status: 'running' },
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('caps the tools list at MAX_TOOLS when flooded with tool:start events', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < MAX_TOOLS + 10; i += 1) {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:tool:start', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: `t${i}`,
|
|
toolName: 'search',
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools).toHaveLength(MAX_TOOLS);
|
|
// Oldest dropped deterministically — the most recent tool call survives.
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools.at(-1)?.toolCallId).toBe(`t${MAX_TOOLS + 9}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a stale agent:end for a foreign conversation cannot re-arm the send lock for a same-tick in-flight second turn', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'second turn' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
|
|
// While the second turn's send is in flight (sent but agent:start not yet
|
|
// received), a terminal event for an unrelated conversation arrives in the
|
|
// same tick as a follow-up send attempt — it must not re-arm the lock.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'other' });
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'third turn attempt' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'third turn attempt')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a stale error for a foreign conversation cannot re-arm the send lock for a same-tick in-flight second turn', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'second turn' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('error', { conversationId: 'other', error: 'unrelated failure' });
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'third turn attempt' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'third turn attempt')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('does not throw and normalizes to empty lists when commands:manifest arrives with null commands/skills', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('commands:manifest', {
|
|
manifest: { commands: null, skills: null, version: 1 },
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.manifest?.commands).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.manifest?.skills).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('does not throw and normalizes to empty lists when system:reload arrives with non-array commands/skills', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('system:reload', {
|
|
commands: 'not-an-array',
|
|
skills: undefined,
|
|
providers: ['anthropic'],
|
|
message: 'Commands reloaded',
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.manifest?.commands).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.manifest?.skills).toEqual([]);
|
|
// The raw stored reload must be normalized the same way as the manifest —
|
|
// never left holding the malformed raw value.
|
|
expect(latest?.state.systemReload?.commands).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.systemReload?.skills).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('falls back to a safe tool label when agent:tool:start carries a non-string toolName', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('agent:tool:start', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
toolCallId: 't1',
|
|
toolName: { evil: 'object' },
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.tools).toEqual([
|
|
{ toolCallId: 't1', toolName: 'Unknown tool', status: 'running' },
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ignores a session:info event whose entire payload is null, without throwing', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('session:info', null);
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sessionInfo).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('emits only one command:approve when approveCommand is called twice in the same tick, preserving the first frozen args', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'staging' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'command:approve')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingApproval).toEqual({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('caps streamed agent:text at MAX_STREAM_CHARS behind a visible marker disclosing the honest dropped-character count across multiple appends', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const firstChunk = 'a'.repeat(MAX_STREAM_CHARS);
|
|
const secondChunk = 'b'.repeat(500);
|
|
const thirdChunk = 'c'.repeat(300);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'c1', text: firstChunk });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'c1', text: secondChunk });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'c1', text: thirdChunk });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const text = latest?.state.text ?? '';
|
|
expect(text.length).toBeLessThanOrEqual(MAX_STREAM_CHARS);
|
|
|
|
const match = text.match(/^…\[truncated (\d+) characters\]…/);
|
|
expect(match).not.toBeNull();
|
|
const markerLength = match?.[0].length ?? 0;
|
|
const droppedCount = Number(match?.[1]);
|
|
const tail = text.slice(markerLength);
|
|
const totalStreamed = firstChunk.length + secondChunk.length + thirdChunk.length;
|
|
|
|
// The marker's N must be the actual count of original characters no
|
|
// longer visible — not an estimate — across all three appends.
|
|
expect(droppedCount).toBe(totalStreamed - tail.length);
|
|
expect(tail.endsWith(thirdChunk)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('caps streamed agent:thinking at MAX_STREAM_CHARS behind the same honest truncation marker as agent:text', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const firstChunk = 'x'.repeat(MAX_STREAM_CHARS);
|
|
const secondChunk = 'y'.repeat(500);
|
|
const thirdChunk = 'z'.repeat(300);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:thinking', { conversationId: 'c1', text: firstChunk });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:thinking', { conversationId: 'c1', text: secondChunk });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:thinking', { conversationId: 'c1', text: thirdChunk });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const thinking = latest?.state.thinking ?? '';
|
|
expect(thinking.length).toBeLessThanOrEqual(MAX_STREAM_CHARS);
|
|
|
|
const match = thinking.match(/^…\[truncated (\d+) characters\]…/);
|
|
expect(match).not.toBeNull();
|
|
const markerLength = match?.[0].length ?? 0;
|
|
const droppedCount = Number(match?.[1]);
|
|
const tail = thinking.slice(markerLength);
|
|
const totalStreamed = firstChunk.length + secondChunk.length + thirdChunk.length;
|
|
|
|
expect(droppedCount).toBe(totalStreamed - tail.length);
|
|
expect(tail.endsWith(thirdChunk)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('caps commandResults at MAX_COMMAND_RESULTS when flooded with command:result events', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < MAX_COMMAND_RESULTS + 5; i += 1) {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:result', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: `cmd${i}`,
|
|
success: true,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.commandResults).toHaveLength(MAX_COMMAND_RESULTS);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.commandResults.at(-1)?.command).toBe(`cmd${MAX_COMMAND_RESULTS + 4}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('caps commands:manifest commands/skills at MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS', async () => {
|
|
const commands = Array.from({ length: MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS + 5 }, (_, i) => ({
|
|
name: `cmd${i}`,
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
description: '',
|
|
scope: 'core' as const,
|
|
execution: 'socket' as const,
|
|
available: true,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('commands:manifest', { manifest: { commands, skills: [], version: 1 } });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.manifest?.commands).toHaveLength(MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('caps a system:reload manifest replacement at MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS for commands, skills, and providers, and drops hostile extra fields instead of spreading the raw payload into state', async () => {
|
|
const commands = Array.from({ length: MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS + 5 }, (_, i) => ({
|
|
name: `cmd${i}`,
|
|
aliases: [],
|
|
description: '',
|
|
scope: 'core' as const,
|
|
execution: 'socket' as const,
|
|
available: true,
|
|
}));
|
|
const skills = Array.from({ length: MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS + 5 }, (_, i) => ({
|
|
name: `skill${i}`,
|
|
description: '',
|
|
available: true,
|
|
}));
|
|
const providers = Array.from({ length: 550 }, (_, i) => `provider-${i}`);
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('system:reload', {
|
|
commands,
|
|
skills,
|
|
providers,
|
|
message: 'reloaded',
|
|
// Hostile field not part of the SystemReloadPayload contract —
|
|
// must never survive into state.systemReload.
|
|
maliciousExtra: 'should-not-survive',
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.manifest?.commands).toHaveLength(MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.manifest?.skills).toHaveLength(MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS);
|
|
// The raw stored reload (state.systemReload) must be bounded the same
|
|
// way as the manifest derived from it — a hostile/oversized broadcast
|
|
// must never leave the uncapped raw payload sitting in state.
|
|
expect(latest?.state.systemReload?.commands).toHaveLength(MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.systemReload?.skills).toHaveLength(MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.systemReload?.providers).toHaveLength(500);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.systemReload).not.toHaveProperty('maliciousExtra');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('caps availableThinkingLevels before storing a hostile session:info payload', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const hostileLevels = Array.from({ length: MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS + 50 }, (_, i) => `level-${i}`);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('session:info', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
provider: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
thinkingLevel: 'level-0',
|
|
availableThinkingLevels: hostileLevels,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sessionInfo?.availableThinkingLevels).toHaveLength(MAX_MANIFEST_ITEMS);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ignores a malformed (object) conversationId on the establishing message:ack, leaving the turn recoverable for a later valid ack', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'hi' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('message:ack', { conversationId: { bad: 'object' }, messageId: 'm0' });
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.ack).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBe('c1');
|
|
expect(latest?.state.ack).toEqual({ conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ignores an empty-string and a null conversationId on the establishing message:ack', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('message:ack', { conversationId: '', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('message:ack', { conversationId: null, messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('sanitizes a malformed (non-string) ack messageId to a visible "unknown" fallback instead of storing the raw value', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: { bad: 'object' } });
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.ack).toEqual({ conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'unknown' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('treats a malformed-conversationId error as a terminal startup failure for a brand-new pending send, releasing the send lock for a retry', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'hi' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('error', { conversationId: { bad: 'object' }, error: 'boom' });
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approvalRequestPending).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe('Unable to start this conversation. Please try again.');
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'retry' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'retry')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('treats a malformed-conversationId agent:end as a terminal startup failure for a brand-new pending send, releasing the send lock for a retry', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'hi' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('agent:end', { conversationId: '' });
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approvalRequestPending).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe('Unable to start this conversation. Please try again.');
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'retry again' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'retry again')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a foreign valid-conversationId error after a conversation is already active remains ignored and cannot unlock anything', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('error', { conversationId: 'other', error: 'unrelated' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBe('c1');
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ignores a malformed (null) conversationId on an establishing agent:start via resolveScopedConversation, leaving the turn recoverable for a later valid one', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'hi' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('agent:start', { conversationId: null });
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingSend).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.conversationId).toBe('c1');
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('normalizes a command:approval with a truthy but non-literal-true success into a denial, releasing the pending lock without enabling execution', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('command:approval', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'deploy',
|
|
success: { truthy: 'object' },
|
|
approvalId: 'ap1',
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approval?.success).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approvalRequestPending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.runApprovedCommand();
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'command:execute')).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('normalizes a command:approval with success: true but a malformed (object) approvalId into a denial that cannot be run', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('command:approval', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'deploy',
|
|
success: true,
|
|
approvalId: { bad: 'object' },
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approval?.success).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approval?.approvalId).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approvalRequestPending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.runApprovedCommand();
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'command:execute')).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('normalizes command:result.success to a literal boolean, never displaying a truthy non-boolean value as success', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmitRaw('command:result', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'model',
|
|
success: { truthy: 'object' },
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.commandResults.at(-1)?.success).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('caps messages at MAX_MESSAGES when flooded with agent:start/text/end cycles on an established conversation', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < MAX_MESSAGES + 5; i += 1) {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:text', { conversationId: 'c1', text: `reply ${i}` });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages).toHaveLength(MAX_MESSAGES);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.at(-1)?.text).toBe(`reply ${MAX_MESSAGES + 4}`);
|
|
// Every retained message.id must stay unique across the cap boundary — a
|
|
// length-derived id would collide once the array plateaus at MAX_MESSAGES.
|
|
const ids = latest?.state.messages.map((m) => m.id) ?? [];
|
|
expect(new Set(ids).size).toBe(ids.length);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('fails closed after the consumed approval cache saturates and rejects replay of the ID the old eviction policy forgot', async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Fill the bounded dedup set to capacity with genuinely distinct,
|
|
// legitimately approved and executed IDs. Each step of approve/respond/
|
|
// run gets its own `act()` so a render (and the ref-syncing effects)
|
|
// lands between them — combining approve+respond in one act would let
|
|
// `approvalRequestPending` flip true-then-false within a single commit,
|
|
// skipping the render the lock-sync effect depends on.
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < MAX_EXECUTED_APPROVAL_IDS; i += 1) {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:approval', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'deploy',
|
|
success: true,
|
|
approvalId: `ap-${i}`,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.runApprovedCommand();
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// One more distinct approval once the set is already full. The old
|
|
// eviction policy would delete the oldest entry (ap-0) to make room and
|
|
// let this execute; the fixed behavior must deny it instead.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:approval', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'deploy',
|
|
success: true,
|
|
approvalId: 'ap-overflow',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.runApprovedCommand();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// The rejected 201st approval is not silently dropped — it must be
|
|
// consumed but also surface a stable, visible notice so the user knows
|
|
// why the command did not run. ChatPage renders state.error as
|
|
// role="alert".
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe(
|
|
'Approval limit reached for this session. This command was not run.',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approval).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(latest?.state.pendingApproval).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
// A fresh local approval request, replaying the very first approvalId —
|
|
// this is the replay the old eviction policy would have let through a
|
|
// second time because it had forgotten ap-0 ever ran.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('command:approval', {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
command: 'deploy',
|
|
success: true,
|
|
approvalId: 'ap-0',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.runApprovedCommand();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const executes = fake.emitted.filter(
|
|
(e): e is EmittedEvent<'command:execute'> => e.event === 'command:execute',
|
|
);
|
|
// Only the original MAX_EXECUTED_APPROVAL_IDS executions ever happened —
|
|
// neither the overflow ID nor the replay of ap-0 produced a new one.
|
|
expect(executes).toHaveLength(MAX_EXECUTED_APPROVAL_IDS);
|
|
expect(executes.filter((e) => e.payload.approvalId === 'ap-0')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(executes.some((e) => e.payload.approvalId === 'ap-overflow')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('does not unlock turn B when a stale same-conversation agent:end from turn A arrives', async () => {
|
|
// Turn A completes normally on c1.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// Turn B is sent (same conversation — the wire gives it no distinct
|
|
// turn id, only the same conversationId as turn A).
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'turn B' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// Turn A's agent:end arrives late (network reordering) for the SAME
|
|
// conversation, before turn B's own ack/start ever arrived. A
|
|
// conversationId-only check cannot tell this apart from turn B's own
|
|
// terminal event, so this must not unlock — turn B has not yet been
|
|
// armed by its own accepted ack/start.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(true);
|
|
// A recognized-stale terminal must be a true no-op — it must not touch
|
|
// streaming/error, which legitimately belong to the still in-flight
|
|
// turn B.
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
// An attempted turn C must still be rejected — the lock is still held.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'turn C attempt' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'turn C attempt')).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// Turn B's own, current ack/start arms the lock, and its own terminal
|
|
// event can then legitimately release it, allowing a later send.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm2' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'turn D' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('settles turn B and releases its lock when a pre-ack error arrives on an already-established conversation, allowing a later send', async () => {
|
|
// Turn A completes normally on c1.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'turn B' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// A same-conversation error arrives before turn B's own ack/start. Once
|
|
// turn A has already fully settled via its own terminal event, ordered
|
|
// Socket.IO delivery means this cannot be a leftover of A — the Gateway
|
|
// has nothing left in flight to emit for a turn it already finished. It
|
|
// can only be a genuine error for the newly sent turn B (e.g. a
|
|
// session-creation failure emitted before ack), so it must settle B.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('error', { conversationId: 'c1', error: 'turn B session failure' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe('turn B session failure');
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'turn C' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'turn C')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('invalidates an outstanding approval request when a pre-ack error settles turn B on an already-established conversation', async () => {
|
|
// Turn A completes normally on c1.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// Turn B is sent but has not yet received its own ack/start.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'turn B' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// An approval request is outstanding on c1 — approveCommand has no
|
|
// dependency on `sending`/`streaming`, so this is legitimate even while
|
|
// turn B has not yet started.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'prod' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approvalRequestPending).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// A genuine pre-ack error for turn B is terminal — same as an
|
|
// active-turn error, it invalidates any approval request still awaiting
|
|
// a response, since the Gateway that just errored is unlikely to still
|
|
// answer it.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('error', { conversationId: 'c1', error: 'turn B session failure' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.approvalRequestPending).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe('turn B session failure');
|
|
|
|
// A fresh approval request can be issued again after the invalidation.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.approveCommand({ command: 'deploy', args: 'staging' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'command:approve')).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("P3-5c: locks the achievable pre-start boundary — turn A settled, turn B sent and acked but before B's own start, a stale/duplicate agent:end from A does not release B (a third send stays blocked), and only B's own start/end sequence legitimately releases it", async () => {
|
|
// This is the provable boundary: in-order Socket.IO delivery guarantees
|
|
// a same-conversation agent:end arriving before this turn's own
|
|
// agent:start can only be a stale straggler. Once a turn is 'active',
|
|
// AgentEndPayload/ErrorPayload carry no turn identity to further
|
|
// distinguish a genuine end from a duplicate — that residual is not,
|
|
// and cannot be, asserted here; full correlation needs a wire turnId
|
|
// (deferred to P5). See the reducer comments in use-chat-connection.ts.
|
|
// Turn A completes normally on c1.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// Turn B is sent and its own ack arrives. Under the old
|
|
// ack-arms-the-lock design this alone made the lock releasable by any
|
|
// same-conversation terminal — the precise bug: it could not yet
|
|
// distinguish B's own eventual agent:end from a late duplicate delivery
|
|
// of A's already-consumed one.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'turn B' });
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm2' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// A duplicate/straggler agent:end for turn A (already fully settled
|
|
// above) is redelivered for the same conversation before B's own
|
|
// agent:start ever arrived. Only B's own accepted agent:start may move
|
|
// it into the active phase that a real agent:end may settle — this
|
|
// duplicate must be a true no-op.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// Turn C must still be blocked — the lock is still genuinely held by B.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'turn C attempt' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'turn C attempt')).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// B's own start, then its own end, legitimately unlocks it.
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:start', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.streaming).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('agent:end', { conversationId: 'c1' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(latest?.state.sending).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
latest?.actions.sendMessage({ content: 'turn D' });
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'message')).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('removes every listener and tears down the socket on cleanup, using no network', async () => {
|
|
const registeredEvents = [...fake.listeners.keys()];
|
|
expect(registeredEvents.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
root?.unmount();
|
|
});
|
|
root = null;
|
|
|
|
for (const [, handlers] of fake.listeners) {
|
|
expect(handlers.size).toBe(0);
|
|
}
|
|
expect(destroySocketMock).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('chat:send-capability protocol negotiation (Task Five MAJOR-1, red-first)', () => {
|
|
const capSelection: HarnessSelection = {
|
|
harnessId: 'pi',
|
|
providerId: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
};
|
|
const UUID = 'bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb';
|
|
// The one fixed, safe user-facing notice the hook must surface (code
|
|
// `send_protocol_unavailable`) when a send is attempted on a connection whose
|
|
// advertised protocol is `unavailable`/unknown/absent. Contract-frozen string.
|
|
const UNAVAILABLE_NOTICE = 'Chat sending is unavailable on this connection.';
|
|
|
|
// These tests each drive the protocol negotiation themselves, so they must
|
|
// start from a clean, unadvertised generation. Reconnect resets protocolRef
|
|
// to `unavailable` and clears the outer `legacy-message` first-wins lock
|
|
// WITHOUT advertising — no client emit, so `fake.emitted` stays empty and the
|
|
// "starts unavailable" premise holds.
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateReconnect();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
async function establishConversation(): Promise<void> {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.serverEmit('message:ack', { conversationId: 'c1', messageId: 'm1' });
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function connectCalls(): number {
|
|
return (fake.socket.connect as unknown as { mock: { calls: unknown[] } }).mock.calls.length;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it('starts with no advertised protocol: a send is refused, emits nothing, mints no key, and surfaces the fixed unavailable notice', async () => {
|
|
// No `chat:send-capability` has arrived, so the connection has not been told
|
|
// it may send at all. The current impl infers "selection + no conversation +
|
|
// no flat provider/model → return false" but SURFACES NOTHING — the red is
|
|
// that the fixed `send_protocol_unavailable` notice is never set.
|
|
let uuidCalls = 0;
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => {
|
|
uuidCalls += 1;
|
|
return UUID;
|
|
});
|
|
let returned: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
returned = harnessSend()({ content: 'hi', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(returned).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe(UNAVAILABLE_NOTICE);
|
|
// The test's name promises "mints no key": the unavailable branch must not
|
|
// reach the idempotency mint at all. Without this assertion a defect that
|
|
// mints a key before refusing survives.
|
|
expect(uuidCalls).toBe(0);
|
|
// ...and no user content may be optimistically appended on refusal.
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'hi')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('legacy-message advertised overrides conversation-inference: an established conversation still routes the legacy message event, never turn:send', async () => {
|
|
// Same inputs the inference impl routes to `turn:send` (selection + active
|
|
// conversation). The advertised protocol is authoritative: it must emit the
|
|
// legacy `message` event instead. Red: current impl emits turn:send.
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
try {
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'hi', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'message',
|
|
payload: { conversationId: 'c1', content: 'hi', provider: 'anthropic', modelId: 'claude' },
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('legacy-message advertised with no conversation: derives provider/model from the selection tuple and emits one message', async () => {
|
|
// The flat provider/modelId caller inputs are gone; the legacy branch must
|
|
// source them from the confirmed persisted selection. Red: current impl
|
|
// refuses a bare harness send (selection + no flat fields → return false).
|
|
let returned: boolean | undefined;
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
returned = harnessSend()({ content: 'first', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(returned).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'message',
|
|
payload: {
|
|
conversationId: undefined,
|
|
content: 'first',
|
|
provider: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('unavailable advertised: refuses even with an active conversation and selection, emits nothing, surfaces the fixed notice', async () => {
|
|
// Red: current impl ignores the advertisement and emits turn:send.
|
|
let uuidCalls = 0;
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => {
|
|
uuidCalls += 1;
|
|
return UUID;
|
|
});
|
|
let returned: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('unavailable', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
returned = harnessSend()({ content: 'nope', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(returned).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe(UNAVAILABLE_NOTICE);
|
|
// Refusal must not optimistically append the user's turn to the transcript
|
|
// (a distinct leak from the emit): the unavailable branch appends nothing.
|
|
expect(latest?.state.messages.some((m) => m.text === 'nope')).toBe(false);
|
|
// ...and must not mint an idempotency key on the refused path.
|
|
expect(uuidCalls).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ignores an advertisement whose connectionId does not match the socket id: protocol stays unavailable and the send is refused', async () => {
|
|
// A capability minted for a different (stale/foreign) connection must never
|
|
// arm this one. Red: current impl has no connection-id gate and emits
|
|
// turn:send off the inferred path.
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
let returned: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', 'a-different-connection');
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
returned = harnessSend()({ content: 'spoof', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(returned).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe(UNAVAILABLE_NOTICE);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('accepts only the first advertisement for the generation: a later conflicting protocol is ignored', async () => {
|
|
// legacy-message wins; the subsequent turn-send is a replay/conflict and is
|
|
// dropped. Red: current impl ignores both and infers turn:send.
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
try {
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('turn-send', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'hi', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.filter((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'message',
|
|
payload: { conversationId: 'c1', content: 'hi', provider: 'anthropic', modelId: 'claude' },
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('resets to unavailable on disconnect: a later send is refused and never reconnects the socket', async () => {
|
|
// Disconnect voids the advertised protocol for the generation. The send must
|
|
// refuse and MUST NOT call socket.connect() to force a reconnection. Red:
|
|
// current impl keeps the conversation, infers turn:send, and its turn:send
|
|
// branch calls socket.connect() when the socket is disconnected.
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
let returned: boolean | undefined;
|
|
let connectsDuringSend = 0;
|
|
try {
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateDisconnect();
|
|
});
|
|
const before = connectCalls();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
returned = harnessSend()({ content: 'after-drop', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
connectsDuringSend = connectCalls() - before;
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(returned).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe(UNAVAILABLE_NOTICE);
|
|
expect(connectsDuringSend).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('resets on reconnect to a fresh generation: refuses until re-advertised, then honors the new advertisement', async () => {
|
|
// A reconnect mints a new Socket.id and a new generation; the prior
|
|
// advertisement (bound to the old id) is stale and must not carry over. The
|
|
// hook only trusts a fresh advertisement for the new connection. Red:
|
|
// current impl has no connect listener and keeps inferring turn:send.
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
let refusedAfterReconnect: boolean | undefined;
|
|
try {
|
|
await establishConversation();
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', fake.socket.id);
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
fake.simulateReconnect('socket-b');
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
refusedAfterReconnect = harnessSend()({ content: 'stale', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(refusedAfterReconnect).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(latest?.state.error).toBe(UNAVAILABLE_NOTICE);
|
|
|
|
// A fresh advertisement for the reconnected id (socket-b) re-arms sending.
|
|
const restore2 = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', 'socket-b');
|
|
});
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
harnessSend()({ content: 'welcome-back', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore2();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'message',
|
|
payload: {
|
|
conversationId: 'c1',
|
|
content: 'welcome-back',
|
|
provider: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('routes on the synchronous protocol ref, not the batched reducer mirror: an advertisement and a send in the SAME tick still route by the just-advertised protocol', async () => {
|
|
// An advertisement lands and a send is issued within one synchronous tick,
|
|
// before React commits the reducer's `sendProtocol` mirror. The send is
|
|
// captured from the pre-advertisement render, so its closed-over reducer
|
|
// state still reads `sendProtocol === 'unavailable'`; the capability
|
|
// handler, however, has already set the synchronous `protocolRef` to
|
|
// `legacy-message`. The hook must route on that ref. Red (against a
|
|
// stale-mirror routing that reads `state.sendProtocol`): the send reads the
|
|
// pre-advertisement `unavailable` and refuses instead of emitting `message`.
|
|
const restore = installRandomUUID(() => UUID);
|
|
try {
|
|
await act(async () => {
|
|
// Bound to the CURRENT (pre-advertisement) render — its closure still
|
|
// sees the reset `unavailable` mirror even after the advert dispatches.
|
|
const sendBeforeCommit = harnessSend();
|
|
advertiseCapability('legacy-message', fake.socket.id);
|
|
// Same tick, no await: React has not committed the new mirror yet, so
|
|
// only `protocolRef` reflects `legacy-message`.
|
|
sendBeforeCommit({ content: 'same-tick', selection: capSelection });
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
restore();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.emitted).toContainEqual({
|
|
event: 'message',
|
|
payload: {
|
|
conversationId: undefined,
|
|
content: 'same-tick',
|
|
provider: 'anthropic',
|
|
modelId: 'claude',
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(fake.emitted.some((e) => e.event === 'turn:send')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|