ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
Implements docs/requirements/hierarchy-schema.md sections 2-4 and the schema-layer half of section 6: - Five class tables (companies, estates, platform_projects, workspaces, hierarchy_grants) with the section 2.7 exhaustive column sets: child node tables carry no timestamps (renames are audited via events), no owner_id anywhere (section 4.4 - ownership is computed from grants). - Grant constraints per section 3: exactly-one-subject and exactly-one-target num_nonnulls CHECKs, six-column UNIQUE NULLS NOT DISTINCT, target FKs CASCADE / principal FKs RESTRICT, six btree indexes. - Migration 0018 generated by drizzle-kit; SQL verified against the contract text and applied on PGlite. - hierarchy-schema.witness.test.ts: dual-leg witness suite (PGlite always; real PostgreSQL under DATABASE_URL, the section 6.8 binding leg in CI). Covers parent-FK integrity + catalog assertion, slug scoping, column allowlist (6.2), all six grant subject/target forms, CHECK refusals, NULLS NOT DISTINCT duplicates, NOT NULL refusals, and deletion semantics (6.6): fail-closed parent delete, leaf cascade of exactly its grants, principal RESTRICT. - hierarchy-writer-coverage.test.ts: section 6.3(b) three-prong static assertion (alias-aware symbol writes, class-table names in SQL literals, raw-execution primitives) with empty writer allowlist, closed infrastructure register, and closed importer enumerations for the migration runner and migrate-tier. All prongs proven able to fire via a planted-violation control. Command family, audit events, and route inventory land in M4-1b.