Files
agent-skills/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/rules/state-decouple-implementation.md
Jason Woltje f5792c40be feat: Complete fleet — 94 skills across 10+ domains
Pulled ALL skills from 15 source repositories:
- anthropics/skills: 16 (docs, design, MCP, testing)
- obra/superpowers: 14 (TDD, debugging, agents, planning)
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills: 25 (marketing, CRO, SEO, growth)
- better-auth/skills: 5 (auth patterns)
- vercel-labs/agent-skills: 5 (React, design, Vercel)
- antfu/skills: 16 (Vue, Vite, Vitest, pnpm, Turborepo)
- Plus 13 individual skills from various repos

Mosaic Stack is not limited to coding — the Orchestrator and
subagents serve coding, business, design, marketing, writing,
logistics, analysis, and more.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-16 16:27:42 -06:00

114 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown

---
title: Decouple State Management from UI
impact: MEDIUM
impactDescription: enables swapping state implementations without changing UI
tags: composition, state, architecture
---
## Decouple State Management from UI
The provider component should be the only place that knows how state is managed.
UI components consume the context interface—they don't know if state comes from
useState, Zustand, or a server sync.
**Incorrect (UI coupled to state implementation):**
```tsx
function ChannelComposer({ channelId }: { channelId: string }) {
// UI component knows about global state implementation
const state = useGlobalChannelState(channelId)
const { submit, updateInput } = useChannelSync(channelId)
return (
<Composer.Frame>
<Composer.Input
value={state.input}
onChange={(text) => sync.updateInput(text)}
/>
<Composer.Submit onPress={() => sync.submit()} />
</Composer.Frame>
)
}
```
**Correct (state management isolated in provider):**
```tsx
// Provider handles all state management details
function ChannelProvider({
channelId,
children,
}: {
channelId: string
children: React.ReactNode
}) {
const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId)
const inputRef = useRef(null)
return (
<Composer.Provider
state={state}
actions={{ update, submit }}
meta={{ inputRef }}
>
{children}
</Composer.Provider>
)
}
// UI component only knows about the context interface
function ChannelComposer() {
return (
<Composer.Frame>
<Composer.Header />
<Composer.Input />
<Composer.Footer>
<Composer.Submit />
</Composer.Footer>
</Composer.Frame>
)
}
// Usage
function Channel({ channelId }: { channelId: string }) {
return (
<ChannelProvider channelId={channelId}>
<ChannelComposer />
</ChannelProvider>
)
}
```
**Different providers, same UI:**
```tsx
// Local state for ephemeral forms
function ForwardMessageProvider({ children }) {
const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
const forwardMessage = useForwardMessage()
return (
<Composer.Provider
state={state}
actions={{ update: setState, submit: forwardMessage }}
>
{children}
</Composer.Provider>
)
}
// Global synced state for channels
function ChannelProvider({ channelId, children }) {
const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId)
return (
<Composer.Provider state={state} actions={{ update, submit }}>
{children}
</Composer.Provider>
)
}
```
The same `Composer.Input` component works with both providers because it only
depends on the context interface, not the implementation.