Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/push/woodpecker Pipeline failed
Makes Mosaic Stack self-contained for orchestration - no external dependencies. New files: - docs/claude/orchestrator.md - Platform-specific orchestrator protocol - docs/templates/ - Bootstrap templates for tasks.md, learnings, reports Templates: - orchestrator/tasks.md.template - Task tracking scaffold - orchestrator/orchestrator-learnings.json.template - Variance tracking - orchestrator/orchestrator-learnings.schema.md - JSON schema docs - orchestrator/phase-issue-body.md.template - Gitea issue body - orchestrator/compaction-summary.md.template - 60% checkpoint format - reports/review-report-scaffold.sh - Creates report directory - scratchpad.md.template - Per-task working document Updated CLAUDE.md: - References local docs/claude/orchestrator.md instead of ~/.claude/ - Added Platform Templates section pointing to docs/templates/ This enables deployment without requiring user-level ~/.claude/ configuration. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
263 lines
4.6 KiB
Bash
Executable File
263 lines
4.6 KiB
Bash
Executable File
#!/bin/bash
|
|
# review-report-scaffold.sh - Create review report directory structure
|
|
# Usage: ./review-report-scaffold.sh <report-name> [project-name]
|
|
|
|
set -e
|
|
|
|
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
|
|
REPORT_NAME="${1:-codebase-review}"
|
|
PROJECT_NAME="${2:-$(basename $(pwd))}"
|
|
REPORT_DATE=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
|
|
REPORT_DIR="docs/reports/${REPORT_NAME}-${REPORT_DATE}"
|
|
|
|
if [[ -d "$REPORT_DIR" ]]; then
|
|
echo "Warning: $REPORT_DIR already exists"
|
|
read -p "Overwrite? [y/N] " -n 1 -r
|
|
echo
|
|
if [[ ! $REPLY =~ ^[Yy]$ ]]; then
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
mkdir -p "${REPORT_DIR}"
|
|
|
|
# Create executive summary
|
|
cat > "${REPORT_DIR}/00-executive-summary.md" << EOF
|
|
# ${PROJECT_NAME} - ${REPORT_NAME}: Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
**Date:** ${REPORT_DATE}
|
|
**Scope:** Full codebase review
|
|
**Method:** Parallel review agents covering security, code quality, and QA/test coverage
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## At a Glance
|
|
|
|
| Dimension | Findings | Critical | High | Medium | Low |
|
|
|-----------|----------|----------|------|--------|-----|
|
|
| Security - API | | | | | |
|
|
| Security - Web | | | | | |
|
|
| Security - Orchestrator | | | | | |
|
|
| Code Quality - API | | | | | |
|
|
| Code Quality - Web | | | | | |
|
|
| Code Quality - Orchestrator | | | | | |
|
|
| **Totals** | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Top 10 Most Urgent Findings
|
|
|
|
<!-- Populated by review agents -->
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
2.
|
|
3.
|
|
4.
|
|
5.
|
|
6.
|
|
7.
|
|
8.
|
|
9.
|
|
10.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Summary by Workspace
|
|
|
|
### apps/api
|
|
- **Security:**
|
|
- **Code Quality:**
|
|
- **Test Grade:**
|
|
|
|
### apps/web
|
|
- **Security:**
|
|
- **Code Quality:**
|
|
- **Test Grade:**
|
|
|
|
### apps/orchestrator
|
|
- **Security:**
|
|
- **Code Quality:**
|
|
- **Test Grade:**
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
1. Create phase issues for critical/high findings
|
|
2. Bootstrap tasks.md from findings
|
|
3. Track remediation progress
|
|
|
|
EOF
|
|
|
|
# Create security review
|
|
cat > "${REPORT_DIR}/01-security-review.md" << EOF
|
|
# ${PROJECT_NAME} - Security Review
|
|
|
|
**Date:** ${REPORT_DATE}
|
|
**Scope:** Security vulnerabilities, authentication, authorization, input validation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Methodology
|
|
|
|
- Static code analysis
|
|
- Dependency vulnerability scan
|
|
- Authentication/authorization review
|
|
- Input validation audit
|
|
- Secret detection
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Findings
|
|
|
|
### Critical Severity
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Format:
|
|
#### SEC-{AREA}-{N}: {Title}
|
|
|
|
| Aspect | Detail |
|
|
|--------|--------|
|
|
| **Location** | \`path/to/file.ts:123\` |
|
|
| **Risk** | Description of security risk |
|
|
| **Impact** | What could happen if exploited |
|
|
| **Remediation** | Steps to fix |
|
|
| **Effort** | Estimate (e.g., 8K tokens) |
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
### High Severity
|
|
|
|
### Medium Severity
|
|
|
|
### Low Severity
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
| Severity | Count |
|
|
|----------|-------|
|
|
| Critical | |
|
|
| High | |
|
|
| Medium | |
|
|
| Low | |
|
|
|
|
EOF
|
|
|
|
# Create code quality review
|
|
cat > "${REPORT_DIR}/02-code-quality-review.md" << EOF
|
|
# ${PROJECT_NAME} - Code Quality Review
|
|
|
|
**Date:** ${REPORT_DATE}
|
|
**Scope:** Code patterns, error handling, performance, maintainability
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Methodology
|
|
|
|
- Pattern consistency analysis
|
|
- Error handling audit
|
|
- Performance anti-pattern detection
|
|
- Type safety review
|
|
- Memory leak detection
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Findings
|
|
|
|
### Critical Severity
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Format:
|
|
#### CQ-{AREA}-{N}: {Title}
|
|
|
|
| Aspect | Detail |
|
|
|--------|--------|
|
|
| **Location** | \`path/to/file.ts:123\` |
|
|
| **Issue** | Description of the problem |
|
|
| **Impact** | Effect on system behavior |
|
|
| **Remediation** | Steps to fix |
|
|
| **Effort** | Estimate (e.g., 10K tokens) |
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
### High Severity
|
|
|
|
### Medium Severity
|
|
|
|
### Low Severity
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
| Severity | Count |
|
|
|----------|-------|
|
|
| Critical | |
|
|
| High | |
|
|
| Medium | |
|
|
| Low | |
|
|
|
|
EOF
|
|
|
|
# Create QA/test coverage review
|
|
cat > "${REPORT_DIR}/03-qa-test-coverage.md" << EOF
|
|
# ${PROJECT_NAME} - QA & Test Coverage Review
|
|
|
|
**Date:** ${REPORT_DATE}
|
|
**Scope:** Test coverage gaps, testing patterns, quality assurance
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Coverage Summary
|
|
|
|
| Workspace | Statements | Branches | Functions | Lines | Grade |
|
|
|-----------|------------|----------|-----------|-------|-------|
|
|
| apps/api | | | | | |
|
|
| apps/web | | | | | |
|
|
| apps/orchestrator | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Critical Coverage Gaps
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Format:
|
|
#### TEST-{AREA}-{N}: {Title}
|
|
|
|
| Aspect | Detail |
|
|
|--------|--------|
|
|
| **Location** | \`path/to/file.ts\` |
|
|
| **Gap** | What is not tested |
|
|
| **Risk** | Why this matters |
|
|
| **Recommended Tests** | Specific tests to add |
|
|
| **Effort** | Estimate (e.g., 15K tokens) |
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Testing Pattern Issues
|
|
|
|
### Missing Test Types
|
|
|
|
### Flaky Tests
|
|
|
|
### Test Organization
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Recommendations
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
2.
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
EOF
|
|
|
|
echo "Created: ${REPORT_DIR}/"
|
|
echo " - 00-executive-summary.md"
|
|
echo " - 01-security-review.md"
|
|
echo " - 02-code-quality-review.md"
|
|
echo " - 03-qa-test-coverage.md"
|
|
echo ""
|
|
echo "Next: Run review agents to populate findings"
|