This commit is contained in:
@@ -139,3 +139,6 @@ services:
|
||||
POSTGRES_USER: mosaic
|
||||
POSTGRES_PASSWORD: mosaic
|
||||
POSTGRES_DB: mosaic
|
||||
# RM-61 negative control 1/2: force a real PostgreSQL startup failure.
|
||||
# This commit is intentionally red and will be reverted after its single run.
|
||||
POSTGRES_INITDB_ARGS: --rm61-invalid-option
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
# RM-61 — CI contract exemption for #1000 teardown artifact
|
||||
|
||||
**Tracking:** RM-61 / issue #1000
|
||||
**Branch:** `fix/rm-61-ci-contract-exemption`
|
||||
**Owner:** `coder-mos1`
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Determine, by red-first provider controls, whether the `ci-postgres` pod-not-found teardown signature discriminates from a real PostgreSQL failure. Only if it discriminates may a named, bounded CI-contract exemption be implemented. The exemption must retire when #1000 is fixed; fixing #1000 is the closure path.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-registered kill criterion
|
||||
|
||||
If an injected real `ci-postgres` failure also yields `pods "wp-svc-<ULID>-ci-postgres" not found` as the service's provider-visible failure, the signature does not discriminate. Option B is unsafe; stop exemption implementation and fall to Option A (#1000).
|
||||
|
||||
## Plan
|
||||
|
||||
1. Capture full `-f json` records for the 11 supplied observations and state counts.
|
||||
2. Run one startup-failure control using the real pgvector/PostgreSQL image with an invalid `initdb` argument.
|
||||
3. Run one post-readiness crash control using real PostgreSQL, `pg_isready`, and a deliberate postmaster kill while a DB-dependent probe is active.
|
||||
4. Compare the raw `ci-postgres` service record independently of failures in dependent steps.
|
||||
5. Investigate runner/time/head clustering only as a hypothesis; never encode incidental correlates or retries into policy.
|
||||
6. If and only if the controls discriminate, implement and test the exact exemption, document its two-way boundary, and track retirement at #1000.
|
||||
|
||||
## Budget
|
||||
|
||||
No explicit token cap supplied. Working estimate: 20K–30K tokens. Limit provider controls to the two pre-registered runs; no retries or re-roll policy.
|
||||
|
||||
## Initial evidence
|
||||
|
||||
Historical JSON saved locally under `.evidence/rm-61/` (not for commit). Supplied pipelines: 11 total. Child-step counts: five pipelines with 9 children and six with 10 children. Seven contain the `ci-postgres` pod-not-found failure (#2170, #2175, #2180, #2181, #2182, #2187, #2188); four do not (#2158, #2167, #2184, #2186). Every observed workflow reports `agent_id=44`, so the available JSON does not separate clean and artifact runs by runner. This refutes runner identity as a discriminator in the sampled record.
|
||||
|
||||
## Progress
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Requirements and kill criterion recorded before control implementation.
|
||||
- [x] Historical full-JSON records captured.
|
||||
- [ ] Startup-failure control observed terminal.
|
||||
- [ ] Post-readiness crash control observed terminal.
|
||||
- [ ] Discrimination verdict recorded.
|
||||
- [ ] Conditional exemption implementation (only if verdict permits).
|
||||
|
||||
## Tests / evidence
|
||||
|
||||
Pending.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks
|
||||
|
||||
The Woodpecker Kubernetes backend may garbage-collect both genuinely failed and successfully used service pods before reconciliation. If so, the provider-visible service signature cannot safely support Option B.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user