docs(records): lead decision 42, Jason's unlock rulings (#1508, #1510)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

docs/SESSIONS.md

@@ -452,3 +452,4 @@ are never rewritten or removed; corrections are new entries.
 2026-09-30T02:27:36Z | Sage (T3 Claude Code) | Paperclip review (paperclipai/paperclip, jetrich mirror at 0b12ca95) | read-only review in /tmp/paperclip-review; covers most of the coordination layer (queue, wakeups, reviewer≠executor, board, chat, Discord); defaults conflict with fail-closed invariants (local_trusted implicit admin, claude skip-permissions default, secrets in env, deletable audit, telemetry on); trial recommended pending Jason's decision; nothing committed
 2026-09-30T02:48:15Z | Sage (T3 Claude Code) | Paperclip trial phase 0 (Jason's go-ahead) | repo /mnt/storage/src/paperclip-trial (local, 15e0d59): paperclipai 2026.916.1 pinned, isolated instance authenticated/private on 127.0.0.1:3170, telemetry off, unauth 403 verified; waits on Jason's board claim; no mosaic-stack source changes
 2026-10-04T04:51:56Z | Sage (T3 Claude Code, thread 1ef1e4f8) | roles/PM/(Re)Launch idea, SetSpark 10-03 read (goal 4 input) | recorded docs/plans/2026-10-04_project-relaunch-roles.md from two read-only subagent passes over six SetSpark threads; not a brief, feeds goal 4 after goal 2
+2026-10-04T05:04:58Z | Sage (T3 Claude Code, thread 1ef1e4f8) | Jason's unlock rulings (decision 42, #1508, #1510) | rows 9, 10, 16 done; row 11 brief 1 of 2; row 31 request posted as jarvis (26620), closes narrowed; #1508 comment 26621; #1510 closed (26622); Sage may launch roster seats in T3 within limits

docs/plans/2026-09-26_lead-decisions.md

@@ -582,3 +582,35 @@ which stay with him. Each item names who decided it and what happened.
       read it, and the next launch rewrites it.
     - The Monday ledger (2026-09-28, #1508 comment 26592) failed on age
       for rows 9, 10, 11 and 13, as decision 40 expected.
+42. **Jason's rulings on seven unlock questions (2026-10-04).** Sage asked
+    in thread 1ef1e4f8. Answers and what followed:
+    1. Gate G: "pass". Rows 9 and 10 are done (revs 32, 33). Verdict posted
+       on #1508 as comment 26621.
+    2. Row 31's brief: "accepted". That's brief 1 of the 2 row 11 needs
+       (note, rev 35).
+    3. Credentials: "use a different seat. Rocko doesn't have the creds or
+       launch." Sage posted row 31's request as jarvis (rev 30), and it went
+       up as comment 26620 (rev 31). A rocko token file does exist under
+       `~/.mosaic/fleet/agents/rocko/secrets/` (checked with `stat` only,
+       per the 2026-09-26 ruling), but Sage doesn't use it. Rocko's current
+       seat is treated as having no credentials and no launch. Row 31's
+       `closes` narrowed to none (rev 36), so finishing that row won't
+       close #1508.
+    4. Sage may launch seats: "yes". The limits Sage proposed and Jason
+       accepted: the mosaic-stack project only; only seats already in
+       `agents/README.md`, with the harness and model listed there; at
+       most two sessions Sage launched running at once; each launch logged
+       in SESSIONS; Jason can revoke it with one word. This grants no new
+       seats, roles, credentials, push, merge or deployment.
+    5. #1510: "yes". Row 16 is done (rev 34). Sage closed #1510 as jarvis
+       with comment 26622.
+    6. Paperclip: "Not loving the operations." Not adopted. The instance on
+       127.0.0.1:3170 that Jason tested stays up as a reference until he
+       says otherwise. Nothing is built on it.
+    7. Row 7's metric: "We are chasing a metric that may be useless. A
+       good starting point perhaps." Row 7 keeps running as a baseline, and
+       its gate stays Jason's. Sage owes a proposal for better guideposts,
+       made in a brief and not in the ledger first.
+    Queue ops ran on the working tree's `queue.mjs`, which carries Rocko's
+    unreviewed row 31 change. That change only adds refusals, and none of
+    these ops hit them.