mosaicstack/stack
25
0
Fork 1
Code Issues 360 Pull Requests 13 Actions Packages Projects Releases 15 Wiki Activity

docs(queue-62): the correction's fail-closed sentence overclaimed; name the assumption

Browse Source 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
jason.woltje
2026-10-11 16:17:16 -05:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5.5
parent ba5e74ad36
commit b93211e37e
1 changed files with 7 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
agents/darkwing/work/queue-62/BUILD.md
+7 -5
View File
@@ -604,10 +604,12 @@ say so. I repeated the claim without checking it. The candidate's tasks
README makes the same claim in "A deleted kanban view answers 404 while
its project still reads 200". Both are unverified on Vikunja 2.7.0.
The fix doesn't depend on those numbers being right. A child drops only
if the confirm read answers 403 or 404, and any other answer fails the
tick, so a wrong guess about the live answers fails closed. What a
read-only live probe would settle is whether a deleted view on a real
child keeps the child, as the README says, or drops it. That probe and
The fix rests on one assumption about the live instance: `GET
/projects/<id>` answers 403 or 404 only when the bot can't read the
project. Any other answer fails the tick. If the live route answered 404
for a project whose kanban view was deleted, the child would drop and
round 2's false tombstones would come back. A read-only live probe would
settle whether a deleted view on a real child keeps the child, as the
README says, or drops it. That probe and
any README change are a follow-up for Sage to place; the approved
candidate `8b81e836` is unchanged.