6 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
mos-dt-0andClaude Opus 5	27350d9f8d	docs(remediation): board — #1025 merged, D-8 banked, phase EXECUTING ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-07-31 17:27:10 -05:00
3 people	fb3221af27	docs(remediation): D-7 reaper doctrine into RM-50; adopt board-roll for the LIVE board ... D-7 resolution recorded. Mos verified attribution independently and reaped ~5.2G of dead-session scratch as lead coordinator. The finding is the gap it exposed: the authority to reap exists, the deterministic reaper does not. Two doctrine points now binding on RM-50: (1) 'agents should tidy up' is instructions-are-not-enforcement wearing another hat — a reaper must own it; (2) refusing to unilaterally delete another session's scratch was correct, and the fix is mechanically-decidable ownership/liveness, not braver deletion. Reaper requirements specified: mechanical liveness (not mtime alone), age threshold, dry-run, audit event per reap — never a heuristic sweep, which would reintroduce the P-WORKFLOW-001 auto-sync failure in a more destructive form. Board restructured into an explicit BOARD-ROLL zone and rolled with the framework's own board-roll.sh (8432B -> 8014B, D-1 archived to BOARD-LEDGER.md) rather than hand-trimmed. The tool exists precisely to stop coordinators hand-trimming; using it is the dogfood. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-07-31 17:25:04 -05:00
3 people	d4f68040ab	docs(remediation): board — PRs #1025/#1026 open, review dispatched, D-6 queue-guard finding ... Third independent live instance of the inert-gate class this session: the mandated ci-queue-wait.sh returned exit 0 on state=unknown while guarding a push. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-07-31 17:25:04 -05:00
3 people	ba98f88891	docs(remediation): reconciled execution backlog from two independent decompositions ... TASK-1 complete. planner-opus (robustness, 38 tasks/8 dissents) and planner-sol (pragmatic, 25 tasks/10 defers/7 dissents) each decomposed the 4-build plan without seeing the other's work. Both decomps are committed alongside the reconciliation so the disagreements stay auditable rather than being flattened into a consensus. Reconciled into 58 tasks across P0-P5 (docs/remediation/TASKS.md): - 7 independent convergences, treated as settled because neither planner could see the other. The headline: BOTH reject the charter's wire-in point (mosaic_orchestrator.py::run_single_task) because that controller is disabled and references a dispatcher absent from this checkout — wiring it would produce a stranded executor, the same built-but-unwired disease one layer up. - 7 genuine disagreements ADJUDICATED, not averaged. The cost estimates are ~18x apart; rather than split the difference, the plan adopts sol's scope with opus's rigor and treats the first-dogfood gate as a hard budget checkpoint. - 3 decisions escalated (wire-in point, rollback artifact + availability trade, queue-guard ownership vs parked PR #1023). No task blocked on them is dispatched. Keystone dogfood case recorded (TASKS.md 1a): merged PR #868 shipped a file failing pnpm format:check, then an unrelated PR reformatted it as a side effect, so main went green and the gate's failure to fire left no trace. Detection must therefore be per-merge-commit against that commit's own tree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-07-31 17:25:04 -05:00
3 people	4fcbf7c07e	docs(remediation): board reflects actual state + 4 dogfood findings from startup ... Corrects the premature "DISPATCHED" planner line (per Mos): both planners are now dispatched for real on GUARANTEED-clean context, not requested-clean. Records Mos rulings: mission.json is retired-rail residue (do not invest); gate-16 holds on interim mos-dt-0 since rev-974 reviews; remote-control path is Mos-relay. Captures 4 live failure classes observed while standing this seat up (D-1..D-4), including an agent that silently ignored an in-message context reset — direct evidence for the postmortem thesis that instructions are not enforcement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-07-31 17:25:04 -05:00
3 people	28f1e272fe	docs(remediation): mission charter + kickstart + live board for the postmortem remediation ... 15/15 proposals decided (13 accept, 2 modify). Collapses to 4 builds + hygiene on one PG spine + choke-point service. Durable mission record for the mos-remediation project orchestrator; compaction-survival resume in KICKSTART.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018XCrpMFmCAXbtSQtQAhDth	2026-07-31 17:25:04 -05:00