Compare commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23483a773d | ||
|
|
80a45b1e1c |
@@ -91,13 +91,27 @@ elif [[ "$PLATFORM" == "gitea" ]]; then
|
||||
GITEA_LOGIN_NAME=$(get_gitea_login || true)
|
||||
if [[ -n "$GITEA_LOGIN_NAME" ]]; then
|
||||
if [[ -n "$COMMENT" ]]; then
|
||||
tea issue comment "$ISSUE_NUMBER" "$COMMENT" --repo "$OWNER/$REPO" --login "$GITEA_LOGIN_NAME"
|
||||
# `tea issue comment` is NOT a subcommand (tea 0.11.x lists only
|
||||
# list/create/edit/reopen/close); comments are the top-level `tea comment`.
|
||||
# The call therefore always failed, was unchecked, and the script proceeded
|
||||
# to close the issue anyway -- losing the record of WHY it was closed.
|
||||
# Route through the authenticated API helper: it is login-independent and is
|
||||
# already the mechanism used by the no-login branch below.
|
||||
gitea_issue_comment_api || {
|
||||
echo "Error: failed to post comment on #$ISSUE_NUMBER -- NOT closing (fail closed)." >&2
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
fi
|
||||
tea issue close "$ISSUE_NUMBER" --repo "$OWNER/$REPO" --login "$GITEA_LOGIN_NAME"
|
||||
else
|
||||
echo "No tea login configured for $(get_remote_host); using authenticated Gitea API fallback." >&2
|
||||
if [[ -n "$COMMENT" ]]; then
|
||||
gitea_issue_comment_api
|
||||
# Fail closed here too: an unchecked comment lets the issue close without its
|
||||
# audit trail, which is the same defect as the tea path above.
|
||||
gitea_issue_comment_api || {
|
||||
echo "Error: failed to post comment on #$ISSUE_NUMBER -- NOT closing (fail closed)." >&2
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
fi
|
||||
gitea_issue_close_api
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user