ci/woodpecker/push/publish Pipeline was canceled
Co-authored-by: orch-01 <[email protected]>
157 lines
6.0 KiB
Bash
Executable File
157 lines
6.0 KiB
Bash
Executable File
#!/bin/bash
|
|
# issue-close.sh - Close an issue on GitHub or Gitea
|
|
# Usage: issue-close.sh -i <issue_number> [-b <comment>]
|
|
# (-c/--comment is a backward-compatible alias for -b/--body; R1/R4 2026-08-28)
|
|
|
|
set -e
|
|
|
|
# Source platform detection
|
|
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
|
|
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/detect-platform.sh"
|
|
|
|
# Parse arguments
|
|
ISSUE_NUMBER=""
|
|
COMMENT=""
|
|
|
|
# Usage-error contract (R4, 2026-08-28): usage errors print to STDERR and exit 2,
|
|
# distinct from provider, credential, and verification failures (exit 1), so a
|
|
# caller or stop gate can tell an invocation defect from a delivery blocker.
|
|
usage_error() {
|
|
echo "Error: $*" >&2
|
|
echo "Usage: issue-close.sh -i <issue_number> [-b <comment>] (see --help)" >&2
|
|
exit 2
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
|
|
case $1 in
|
|
-i|--issue)
|
|
[[ $# -ge 2 && "$2" != - && "$2" != --* && ! "$2" =~ ^-[[:alnum:]] ]] || usage_error "option $1 requires a value (option-like values are rejected; bare - is reserved)"
|
|
ISSUE_NUMBER="$2"
|
|
shift 2
|
|
;;
|
|
-b|--body|-c|--comment)
|
|
# R1 (2026-08-28): --body is the canonical flag; -c/--comment stays
|
|
# a backward-compatible alias.
|
|
[[ $# -ge 2 && "$2" != - && "$2" != --* && ! "$2" =~ ^-[[:alnum:]] ]] || usage_error "option $1 requires a value (option-like values are rejected; bare - is reserved)"
|
|
COMMENT="$2"
|
|
shift 2
|
|
;;
|
|
-h|--help)
|
|
echo "Usage: issue-close.sh -i <issue_number> [-b <comment>]"
|
|
echo ""
|
|
echo "Options:"
|
|
echo " -i, --issue Issue number (required)"
|
|
echo " -b, --body Comment to add before closing (optional; canonical)"
|
|
echo " -c, --comment Alias for --body"
|
|
echo " -h, --help Show this help"
|
|
echo ""
|
|
echo "Exit codes: 0 success; 2 usage error (stderr); 1 provider/credential/verification failure."
|
|
exit 0
|
|
;;
|
|
*)
|
|
usage_error "unknown option: $1"
|
|
;;
|
|
esac
|
|
done
|
|
|
|
if [[ -z "$ISSUE_NUMBER" ]]; then
|
|
usage_error "issue number is required (-i/--issue)"
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
# Detect platform and close issue
|
|
detect_platform >/dev/null
|
|
OWNER=$(get_repo_owner)
|
|
REPO=$(get_repo_name)
|
|
|
|
gitea_issue_comment_api() {
|
|
local host token url payload
|
|
host=$(get_remote_host) || return 1
|
|
token=$(get_gitea_token "$host") || return 1
|
|
url="https://${host}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/issues/${ISSUE_NUMBER}/comments"
|
|
payload=$(COMMENT="$COMMENT" python3 - <<'PY'
|
|
import json
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
print(json.dumps({"body": os.environ["COMMENT"]}))
|
|
PY
|
|
)
|
|
curl -fsS -X POST \
|
|
-H "User-Agent: curl/8" \
|
|
-H "Authorization: token ${token}" \
|
|
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
|
|
-d "$payload" \
|
|
"$url" >/dev/null
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
gitea_issue_close_api() {
|
|
local host token url
|
|
host=$(get_remote_host) || return 1
|
|
token=$(get_gitea_token "$host") || return 1
|
|
url="https://${host}/api/v1/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}/issues/${ISSUE_NUMBER}"
|
|
curl -fsS -X PATCH \
|
|
-H "User-Agent: curl/8" \
|
|
-H "Authorization: token ${token}" \
|
|
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
|
|
-d '{"state":"closed"}' \
|
|
"$url" >/dev/null
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if [[ "$PLATFORM" == "github" ]]; then
|
|
# R4: normalize provider failures to exit 1 (gh's own usage errors exit 2
|
|
# and would collide with the reserved usage-error status).
|
|
if [[ -n "$COMMENT" ]]; then
|
|
gh_rc=0
|
|
gh issue comment "$ISSUE_NUMBER" --body "$COMMENT" || gh_rc=$?
|
|
if [[ "$gh_rc" -ne 0 ]]; then
|
|
echo "Error: GitHub comment before close failed (gh exit $gh_rc)" >&2
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
fi
|
|
gh_rc=0
|
|
gh issue close "$ISSUE_NUMBER" || gh_rc=$?
|
|
if [[ "$gh_rc" -ne 0 ]]; then
|
|
echo "Error: GitHub issue close failed (gh exit $gh_rc)" >&2
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
echo "Closed GitHub issue #$ISSUE_NUMBER"
|
|
elif [[ "$PLATFORM" == "gitea" ]]; then
|
|
GITEA_LOGIN_NAME=$(get_gitea_login || true)
|
|
if [[ -n "$GITEA_LOGIN_NAME" ]]; then
|
|
if [[ -n "$COMMENT" ]]; then
|
|
# `tea issue comment` is NOT a subcommand -- tea 0.11.x lists only
|
|
# list/create/edit/reopen/close under `tea issue`. Comments are the
|
|
# TOP-LEVEL `tea comment`, which takes the same --repo/--login flags.
|
|
# The old call therefore always failed, was unchecked, and the script
|
|
# closed the issue anyway, losing the record of WHY.
|
|
#
|
|
# Use `tea comment` rather than the API helper so the comment and the
|
|
# close are made by the SAME principal ($GITEA_LOGIN_NAME). Routing the
|
|
# comment through the token-authenticated helper here would attribute the
|
|
# comment to the token holder and the close to the tea login -- two
|
|
# principals for one operation.
|
|
tea comment "$ISSUE_NUMBER" "$COMMENT" --repo "$OWNER/$REPO" --login "$GITEA_LOGIN_NAME" || {
|
|
echo "Error: failed to post comment on #$ISSUE_NUMBER -- NOT closing (fail closed)." >&2
|
|
exit 1
|
|
}
|
|
fi
|
|
prov_rc=0
|
|
tea issue close "$ISSUE_NUMBER" --repo "$OWNER/$REPO" --login "$GITEA_LOGIN_NAME" || prov_rc=$?
|
|
[[ "$prov_rc" -eq 0 ]] || { echo "Error: provider command failed (exit ${prov_rc}; provider failure, not a usage error)" >&2; exit 1; }
|
|
else
|
|
echo "No tea login configured for $(get_remote_host); using authenticated Gitea API fallback." >&2
|
|
if [[ -n "$COMMENT" ]]; then
|
|
# Fail closed here too: an unchecked comment lets the issue close without its
|
|
# audit trail, which is the same defect as the tea path above.
|
|
gitea_issue_comment_api || {
|
|
echo "Error: failed to post comment on #$ISSUE_NUMBER -- NOT closing (fail closed)." >&2
|
|
exit 1
|
|
}
|
|
fi
|
|
gitea_issue_close_api
|
|
fi
|
|
echo "Closed Gitea issue #$ISSUE_NUMBER"
|
|
else
|
|
echo "Error: Unknown platform"
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|