Files
stack/packages/mosaic/framework/tools/git/pr-review.sh
mosaic-coder 03e1cdbcd9
Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was canceled
fix(framework): pr-review.sh -r/--repo + -H/--host overrides, UA header, repo preflight (Patch 5/5c)
Upstreams the pr-review.sh -r/--repo and -H/--host override family from the
host-local tooling-patches kit (patch 5 + 5c), adapted to the framework's
current REST-native review/comment implementation:

- -r/--repo <owner/repo>: explicit slug override, skipping git-remote slug
  inference, for reviewer worktrees whose origin is nonstandard or missing.
  Mirrors the established -r convention of the sibling wrappers (pr-view.sh,
  pr-diff.sh, pr-ci-wait.sh; #867). detect_platform is now tolerant of a
  missing/foreign git origin when -r is given (assumes gitea), matching the
  same sibling-wrapper convention.
- -H/--host <host>: explicit Gitea host override, skipping remote-host
  inference, so ambient CWD/remote state cannot cross-wire a review/comment to
  the wrong instance.
- Repo-exists preflight: when -r is used, GET .../repos/<slug> BEFORE any
  write. A wrong-host cross-wire now surfaces as a clear preflight error
  instead of an opaque write-404.
- `User-Agent: mosaic-pr-review` header added to every Gitea curl call (write,
  read-back, /user, PR-head read, preflight) — some Cloudflare-fronted Gitea
  hosts intermittently reject curl's default User-Agent.

Reproduce-first evidence (against origin/main baseline, fresh clone):
- -r/-H: `./pr-review.sh -n 1 -a comment -c x -r foo/bar` / `-H example.test`
  both failed with "Unknown option" pre-patch; both parse post-patch.
- User-Agent: `grep -c User-Agent pr-review.sh` was 0 pre-patch.
- New regression test (test-pr-review-repo-host-override.sh) fails against the
  baseline file and passes against the patched file (red-first confirmed).

Scope note — two sub-changes from the source kit's patch family (5b: an
issue_url-empty html_url readback fallback; 5d: REST-native reviews replacing
`tea approve/reject`) were investigated and found ALREADY SUPERSEDED on this
baseline by a more robust, already-tested implementation:
- 5d: the current gitea_submit_review_verified() already POSTs to
  /pulls/{n}/reviews (no `tea pr approve/reject` call exists in this file —
  `grep -c 'tea pr' pr-review.sh` is 0), with additional hardening (identity
  binding, PR-head commit pinning, current-head TOCTOU close-out) beyond what
  the source patch describes.
- 5b: comment verification already keys off `pull_request_url` (not
  `issue_url`) with full origin+path pinning (see gitea_create_comment_verified
  / test-pr-review-gitea-comment.sh cases 15b, 17), which already handles the
  Gitea empty-issue_url-on-PR-comments behavior the source patch targets, via a
  stricter mechanism than a bare html_url fallback would provide. Porting the
  source kit's simpler fallback verbatim would have been a regression.

Per HALT-on-no-repro discipline, only the two sub-changes that actually
reproduced against baseline (5, 5c) are included here.

Part of #891
2026-07-25 16:18:06 -05:00

713 lines
33 KiB
Bash
Executable File

#!/bin/bash
# pr-review.sh - Review a pull request on GitHub or Gitea
# Usage: pr-review.sh -n <pr_number> -a <action> [-c <comment>] [--login <name>] [-r owner/repo] [-H host]
#
# Gitea reviews and comments are written through the supported REST API, not
# `tea`: tea 0.11.1 cannot emit the id of a record it creates and can silently
# no-op while exiting 0 (#865 defect class), so an exit code is the only — and
# untrustworthy — signal it offers. approve/request-changes POST to
# /pulls/{n}/reviews (returns the created review with its id); the `comment`
# action POSTs to /issues/{n}/comments (returns the created comment with its
# id). Each write is then verified by GETting that exact returned id, so a
# concurrent record cannot masquerade as this write and a no-op fails closed.
#
# --login override: the default login is resolved from the local tea login list
# for this repo's host (get_gitea_login_for_host). Pass --login <name> to
# override it for this invocation only. The REST write, the /user identity read,
# and every read-back are ALL performed with the token of the EFFECTIVE login,
# so the write and its verification bind to the same identity.
#
# -r/--repo override: explicit owner/repo slug, skipping git-remote slug
# inference — mirrors the -r convention of the sibling wrappers (pr-view.sh,
# pr-diff.sh, pr-ci-wait.sh; mosaicstack/stack #867) for reviewer worktrees
# whose origin is nonstandard or missing. -H/--host makes the target Gitea
# instance explicit too (skips remote-host inference), so ambient CWD/remote
# state can no longer cross-wire the review to the wrong instance. With -r, the
# resolved repo is preflighted (GET .../repos/<slug>) BEFORE any write so a
# wrong-host cross-wire surfaces as a clear preflight error instead of an opaque
# write-404. Every Gitea curl (write, read-back, preflight) carries a
# `User-Agent: mosaic-pr-review` header, since some Cloudflare-fronted Gitea
# hosts intermittently reject curl's default User-Agent.
set -e
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
# shellcheck source=packages/mosaic/framework/tools/git/detect-platform.sh
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/detect-platform.sh"
# Parse arguments
PR_NUMBER=""
ACTION=""
COMMENT=""
LOGIN_OVERRIDE=""
REPO_OVERRIDE=""
HOST_OVERRIDE=""
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
case $1 in
-n|--number)
PR_NUMBER="$2"
shift 2
;;
-a|--action)
ACTION="$2"
shift 2
;;
-c|--comment)
COMMENT="$2"
shift 2
;;
-l|--login)
LOGIN_OVERRIDE="$2"
shift 2
;;
-r|--repo)
REPO_OVERRIDE="$2"
shift 2
;;
-H|--host)
HOST_OVERRIDE="$2"
shift 2
;;
-h|--help)
echo "Usage: pr-review.sh -n <pr_number> -a <action> [-c <comment>] [--login <name>] [-r owner/repo] [-H host]"
echo ""
echo "Options:"
echo " -n, --number PR number (required)"
echo " -a, --action Review action: approve, request-changes, comment (required)"
echo " -c, --comment Review comment (required for request-changes)"
echo " -l, --login Override the detected Gitea tea login (approve/request-changes only)"
echo " -r, --repo Explicit owner/repo slug (skips git-remote slug inference)"
echo " -H, --host Explicit Gitea host (skips remote-host inference)"
echo " -h, --help Show this help"
exit 0
;;
*)
echo "Unknown option: $1"
exit 1
;;
esac
done
if [[ -z "$PR_NUMBER" ]]; then
echo "Error: PR number is required (-n)"
exit 1
fi
if [[ -z "$ACTION" ]]; then
echo "Error: Action is required (-a): approve, request-changes, comment"
exit 1
fi
if [[ -n "$REPO_OVERRIDE" ]]; then
# An explicit --repo is the whole point of a reviewer worktree whose origin
# is nonstandard or missing (#867 convention, mirrored from pr-view.sh /
# pr-diff.sh): do not hard-fail platform detection on a missing/foreign
# origin — assume gitea, the only platform --repo/--host target.
detect_platform >/dev/null 2>&1 || PLATFORM="gitea"
else
detect_platform >/dev/null
fi
# Post a comment to a Gitea PR (PR comments ARE issue comments) via the
# supported REST API and verify it against a PROVIDER-RETURNED created id. The
# write is a direct POST that returns the created comment object, so we learn
# the exact id of THIS write; we GET that exact id and require id == created id
# AND author == acting identity AND exact body AND that it belongs to this PR.
# Keying to the returned id means no concurrent comment (even same identity /
# body) can masquerade as this write, and a no-op create yields no id and fails
# closed. Requires GITEA_API_BASE / GITEA_API_TOKEN to be resolved first (via
# gitea_resolve_api_for_login). Prints the created comment id on success.
#
# Args: $1 = PR number, $2 = comment body, $3 = acting identity login.
gitea_create_comment_verified() {
local pr_number="$1" comment_body="$2" acting_login="$3"
local payload write_file readback_file auth_config write_status readback_status created_id
payload=$(COMMENT_BODY="$comment_body" python3 -c '
import json
import os
print(json.dumps({"body": os.environ["COMMENT_BODY"]}))
')
write_file=$(mktemp "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mosaic-pr-review-write.XXXXXX")
readback_file=$(mktemp "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mosaic-pr-review-getid.XXXXXX")
auth_config=$(gitea_write_auth_config "$GITEA_API_TOKEN") || {
rm -f "$write_file" "$readback_file"
echo "Error: could not stage Gitea credential for comment write" >&2
return 1
}
trap 'rm -f "$write_file" "$readback_file" "$auth_config"' RETURN
if ! write_status=$(curl -sS -o "$write_file" -w '%{http_code}' \
-X POST \
--config "$auth_config" \
-H 'User-Agent: mosaic-pr-review' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "$payload" \
"$GITEA_API_BASE/issues/$pr_number/comments"); then
echo "Error: Gitea comment write transport failed" >&2
return 1
fi
if [[ "$write_status" != "201" ]]; then
echo "Error: Gitea comment write failed with HTTP $write_status" >&2
return 1
fi
created_id=$(python3 - "$write_file" <<'PY'
import json
import sys
try:
with open(sys.argv[1], encoding="utf-8") as response:
comment = json.load(response)
created_id = comment.get("id") if isinstance(comment, dict) else None
if not isinstance(created_id, int) or created_id <= 0:
raise ValueError("create response carried no positive comment id")
except (OSError, json.JSONDecodeError, ValueError) as error:
print(f"Error: could not identify created Gitea comment: {error}", file=sys.stderr)
raise SystemExit(1)
print(created_id)
PY
) || return 1
if ! readback_status=$(curl -sS -o "$readback_file" -w '%{http_code}' \
--config "$auth_config" \
-H 'User-Agent: mosaic-pr-review' \
"$GITEA_API_BASE/issues/comments/$created_id"); then
echo "Error: Gitea comment read-back transport failed" >&2
return 1
fi
if [[ "$readback_status" != "200" ]]; then
echo "Error: Gitea comment read-back failed with HTTP $readback_status" >&2
return 1
fi
EXPECTED_COMMENT_ID="$created_id" EXPECTED_COMMENT_BODY="$comment_body" \
ACTING_LOGIN="$acting_login" EXPECTED_REPO_SLUG="${GITEA_API_BASE##*/repos/}" \
EXPECTED_NUMBER="$pr_number" EXPECTED_WEB_BASE="$GITEA_WEB_BASE" \
python3 - "$readback_file" <<'PY' || return 1
import json
import os
import sys
from urllib.parse import urlparse
def _origin_and_path(url):
# Normalize a URL to (scheme, host, effective-port) + comment path. The port
# defaults to the scheme's default (80 http / 443 otherwise) so an implicit
# port and its explicit default form compare equal.
parsed = urlparse(url or "")
scheme = (parsed.scheme or "").lower()
host = (parsed.hostname or "").lower()
default_port = 80 if scheme == "http" else 443
port = parsed.port if parsed.port is not None else default_port
return (scheme, host, port), parsed.path.rstrip("/")
try:
with open(sys.argv[1], encoding="utf-8") as response:
comment = json.load(response)
if not isinstance(comment, dict):
raise ValueError("response is not a comment object")
expected_id = int(os.environ["EXPECTED_COMMENT_ID"])
expected_body = os.environ["EXPECTED_COMMENT_BODY"]
acting_login = os.environ["ACTING_LOGIN"]
slug = os.environ["EXPECTED_REPO_SLUG"]
number = os.environ["EXPECTED_NUMBER"]
web_base = os.environ["EXPECTED_WEB_BASE"]
# Gitea populates WEB (html) URLs here, not API paths. A PR-conversation
# comment carries pull_request_url = <web_base>/<owner>/<repo>/pulls/<n> (with
# issue_url empty), while a plain issue comment carries
# issue_url = <web_base>/<owner>/<repo>/issues/<n> (with pull_request_url empty).
# This is the pr-review `comment` action, so the comment MUST land on a pull
# request: require pull_request_url. A plain issue_url is REJECTED — if issue
# #N exists but PR #N does not, POST /issues/N/comments creates an issue
# comment, and accepting that issue_url would let the wrapper falsely report a
# verified PR comment (issue-comment.sh legitimately keeps the broader
# issue-or-PR acceptance; a PR review does not).
# Pin the returned URL's ORIGIN (scheme+host+port) and its FULL path to this
# provider + repo + kind + number — an endswith/suffix test would accept a
# look-alike host (evil.example/deceptive/<slug>/pulls/N) or a same-host
# decoy prefix (/other/<slug>/pulls/N), so compare the whole thing.
base_origin, base_path = _origin_and_path(web_base)
expected_pr_path = f"{base_path}/{slug}/pulls/{number}"
def _belongs(url, expected_path):
if not url:
return False
origin, path = _origin_and_path(url)
# Repo owner/repo slugs are case-insensitive (Gitea canonicalizes the
# pull_request_url slug to lowercase on return), while EXPECTED_REPO_SLUG
# is taken verbatim from GITEA_API_BASE and may be mixed-case. The
# remainder of the path (".../pulls/<number>") is numeric, so lowercasing
# the whole path for this comparison only relaxes case, not identity: the
# origin tuple (scheme+host+port) above still pins the provider host, and
# the path is still compared in FULL (no endswith/suffix match), so the
# look-alike-host and same-host decoy-prefix protections are unchanged.
return origin == base_origin and path.lower() == expected_path.lower()
if comment.get("id") != expected_id:
raise ValueError("read-back id does not match the created id")
if (comment.get("user") or {}).get("login") != acting_login:
raise ValueError("created comment is not authored by the acting identity")
if comment.get("body") != expected_body:
raise ValueError("created comment body does not match")
if not _belongs(comment.get("pull_request_url"), expected_pr_path):
raise ValueError("claimed PR comment did not land on a pull request (kind=pulls) on this provider/repo")
except (OSError, json.JSONDecodeError, KeyError, TypeError, ValueError) as error:
print(f"Error: Gitea comment persistence verification failed: {error}", file=sys.stderr)
raise SystemExit(1)
PY
echo "$created_id"
return 0
}
# Resolve and cache the Gitea REST endpoint + token for the current remote,
# bound to a SPECIFIC login identity ($1). Populates GITEA_API_ROOT (…/api/v1),
# GITEA_API_BASE (…/api/v1/repos/<slug>), and GITEA_API_TOKEN.
#
# The token is resolved for the EFFECTIVE login (the --login override when
# given, otherwise the detected default), so the one credential used to submit
# the review/comment ALSO drives the /user identity read and every read-back —
# write token and read-back token are the same identity by construction. This
# is the credential-ordering fix: a --login override is no longer submitted
# under one credential and verified under a different default one. Falls back to
# the host-scoped credential ONLY when NO --login override was supplied (the
# best-effort default path). When $2 is "explicit" the login came from a
# caller-supplied --login: that exact login's token MUST resolve, and we FAIL
# CLOSED rather than silently downgrading the review/comment to the host default
# identity. Returns non-zero (clear stderr) on any resolution failure.
#
# Honors the module-level REPO_OVERRIDE / HOST_OVERRIDE (-r/--repo, -H/--host):
# when set, they skip git-remote slug/host inference entirely — for reviewer
# worktrees whose origin is nonstandard or missing, and to make the target
# instance fully deterministic (an ambient CWD/remote can otherwise cross-wire
# a review to the wrong Gitea host). When -r/--repo is used, the resolved repo
# is preflighted (GET .../repos/<slug>) BEFORE any write: a wrong-host
# cross-wire would otherwise surface only as an opaque write-404 with zero
# residue.
gitea_resolve_api_for_login() {
local effective_login="$1" override_explicit="${2:-}" host configured_url repo
local preflight_auth_config preflight_status
if [[ -n "$HOST_OVERRIDE" ]]; then
host="$HOST_OVERRIDE"
else
host=$(get_remote_host)
fi
if [[ -n "$override_explicit" ]]; then
GITEA_API_TOKEN=$(get_gitea_token_for_login "$effective_login" "$host") || {
echo "Error: could not resolve a host-matched Gitea token for --login '$effective_login' on host '$host'; refusing to fall back to the host default identity or a cross-host credential (review write/read-back)" >&2
return 1
}
else
GITEA_API_TOKEN=$(get_gitea_token_for_login "$effective_login" "$host") \
|| GITEA_API_TOKEN=$(get_gitea_token "$host") || {
echo "Error: Gitea token not found for login '$effective_login' (review write/read-back)" >&2
return 1
}
fi
configured_url=$(get_gitea_url_for_host "$host") || {
echo "Error: Configured Gitea URL not found for review read-back verification" >&2
return 1
}
if [[ -n "$REPO_OVERRIDE" ]]; then
repo="$REPO_OVERRIDE"
else
repo=$(get_gitea_repo_slug_for_url "$configured_url") || {
echo "Error: Could not resolve Gitea owner/repository relative to configured URL" >&2
return 1
}
fi
GITEA_API_ROOT="${configured_url%/}/api/v1"
GITEA_API_BASE="$GITEA_API_ROOT/repos/$repo"
# The provider WEB base (scheme + host + effective port + any deployment path
# prefix) that Gitea uses to build a comment's html issue_url/pull_request_url.
# Read-back verification pins the returned URL's origin + path prefix to THIS,
# not just a repo/PR suffix.
GITEA_WEB_BASE="${configured_url%/}"
if [[ -n "$REPO_OVERRIDE" ]]; then
preflight_auth_config=$(gitea_write_auth_config "$GITEA_API_TOKEN") || {
echo "Error: could not stage Gitea credential for --repo preflight" >&2
return 1
}
preflight_status=$(curl -sS -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' \
--config "$preflight_auth_config" \
-H 'User-Agent: mosaic-pr-review' \
"$GITEA_API_BASE") || preflight_status="000"
rm -f "$preflight_auth_config"
if [[ "$preflight_status" != "200" ]]; then
echo "Error: repo '$repo' not reachable at $configured_url (HTTP $preflight_status) — wrong host? pass -H/--host <gitea-host> or cd into the target checkout" >&2
return 1
fi
fi
return 0
}
# Resolve the login of the identity the API token authenticates as (GET
# /user). Used to attribute a read-back review to THIS action's reviewer so a
# concurrent review from a DIFFERENT identity cannot satisfy verification.
# Prints the login on success.
gitea_authenticated_login() {
local response_file auth_config status
response_file=$(mktemp "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mosaic-pr-review-whoami.XXXXXX")
auth_config=$(gitea_write_auth_config "$GITEA_API_TOKEN") || {
rm -f "$response_file"
echo "Error: could not stage Gitea credential for identity read" >&2
return 1
}
trap 'rm -f "$response_file" "$auth_config"' RETURN
if ! status=$(curl -sS -o "$response_file" -w '%{http_code}' \
--config "$auth_config" \
-H 'User-Agent: mosaic-pr-review' \
"$GITEA_API_ROOT/user"); then
echo "Error: Gitea authenticated-identity read transport failed" >&2
return 1
fi
if [[ "$status" != "200" ]]; then
echo "Error: Gitea authenticated-identity read failed with HTTP $status" >&2
return 1
fi
python3 - "$response_file" <<'PY'
import json
import sys
try:
with open(sys.argv[1], encoding="utf-8") as response:
user = json.load(response)
login = user.get("login") if isinstance(user, dict) else None
if not isinstance(login, str) or not login:
raise ValueError("missing authenticated login")
except (OSError, json.JSONDecodeError, TypeError, ValueError) as error:
print(f"Error: could not resolve authenticated Gitea identity: {error}", file=sys.stderr)
raise SystemExit(1)
print(login)
PY
}
# GET /pulls/{n} into a caller-owned response file and print its head commit
# SHA. This core sets NO RETURN trap and reuses a caller-provided auth config +
# response file, so it is safe to call from INSIDE another trapped function
# (the post-verify re-read below) without clobbering that function's cleanup
# trap. $1 = PR number, $2 = response file, $3 = curl auth config file.
gitea_read_pr_head_into() {
local pr_number="$1" pr_file="$2" auth_config="$3" status
if ! status=$(curl -sS -o "$pr_file" -w '%{http_code}' \
--config "$auth_config" \
-H 'User-Agent: mosaic-pr-review' \
"$GITEA_API_BASE/pulls/$pr_number"); then
echo "Error: Gitea PR head read transport failed" >&2
return 1
fi
if [[ "$status" != "200" ]]; then
echo "Error: Gitea PR head read failed with HTTP $status" >&2
return 1
fi
python3 - "$pr_file" <<'PY'
import json
import sys
try:
with open(sys.argv[1], encoding="utf-8") as response:
pr = json.load(response)
head_sha = pr.get("head", {}).get("sha") if isinstance(pr, dict) else None
if not isinstance(head_sha, str) or not head_sha:
raise ValueError("missing PR head sha")
except (OSError, json.JSONDecodeError, AttributeError, TypeError, ValueError) as error:
print(f"Error: could not resolve PR head commit: {error}", file=sys.stderr)
raise SystemExit(1)
print(head_sha)
PY
}
# Resolve the PR's current head commit SHA (GET /pulls/{n}). The review is
# submitted against — and later verified as pinned to — this exact commit, so a
# stale review left over from an earlier push cannot be mistaken for this one.
# Prints the head SHA on success.
gitea_pr_head_sha() {
local pr_number="$1" pr_file auth_config
pr_file=$(mktemp "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mosaic-pr-review-head.XXXXXX")
auth_config=$(gitea_write_auth_config "$GITEA_API_TOKEN") || {
rm -f "$pr_file"
echo "Error: could not stage Gitea credential for PR head read" >&2
return 1
}
trap 'rm -f "$pr_file" "$auth_config"' RETURN
gitea_read_pr_head_into "$pr_number" "$pr_file" "$auth_config"
}
# Submit a review to a Gitea PR via the supported REST API and verify it against
# a PROVIDER-RETURNED created id. tea 0.11.1's `pr approve`/`reject` cannot emit
# the id of the review it created and can silently no-op while exiting 0 (#865
# defect class), so this does NOT shell out to tea: it POSTs to
# /pulls/{n}/reviews with the event (APPROVED / REQUEST_CHANGES), the PR head
# commit_id, and the review body, which returns the created review object
# including its id. It then GETs that exact review id and requires
# id == created id AND author == acting identity AND state == expected AND
# commit_id == PR head. Keying to the returned id means no concurrent review
# (even same identity/state/head) can masquerade as this one, and a no-op
# submit yields no id and fails closed. Prints the created review id on success.
#
# Args: $1 = PR number, $2 = event (APPROVED|REQUEST_CHANGES),
# $3 = review body (may be empty for APPROVED), $4 = acting login,
# $5 = PR head sha.
gitea_submit_review_verified() {
local pr_number="$1" event="$2" review_body="$3" acting_login="$4" head_sha="$5"
local payload write_file readback_file recheck_file auth_config
local write_status readback_status created_id live_head
payload=$(REVIEW_EVENT="$event" REVIEW_BODY="$review_body" REVIEW_COMMIT="$head_sha" python3 -c '
import json
import os
print(json.dumps({
"event": os.environ["REVIEW_EVENT"],
"body": os.environ["REVIEW_BODY"],
"commit_id": os.environ["REVIEW_COMMIT"],
}))
')
write_file=$(mktemp "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mosaic-pr-review-submit.XXXXXX")
readback_file=$(mktemp "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mosaic-pr-review-getid.XXXXXX")
recheck_file=$(mktemp "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mosaic-pr-review-recheck.XXXXXX")
auth_config=$(gitea_write_auth_config "$GITEA_API_TOKEN") || {
rm -f "$write_file" "$readback_file" "$recheck_file"
echo "Error: could not stage Gitea credential for review submit" >&2
return 1
}
trap 'rm -f "$write_file" "$readback_file" "$recheck_file" "$auth_config"' RETURN
if ! write_status=$(curl -sS -o "$write_file" -w '%{http_code}' \
-X POST \
--config "$auth_config" \
-H 'User-Agent: mosaic-pr-review' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "$payload" \
"$GITEA_API_BASE/pulls/$pr_number/reviews"); then
echo "Error: Gitea review submit transport failed" >&2
return 1
fi
# Gitea returns 200 (occasionally 201) with the created review object.
if [[ "$write_status" != "200" && "$write_status" != "201" ]]; then
echo "Error: Gitea review submit failed with HTTP $write_status (#865: no durable review created)" >&2
return 1
fi
created_id=$(python3 - "$write_file" <<'PY'
import json
import sys
try:
with open(sys.argv[1], encoding="utf-8") as response:
review = json.load(response)
created_id = review.get("id") if isinstance(review, dict) else None
if not isinstance(created_id, int) or created_id <= 0:
raise ValueError("submit response carried no positive review id")
except (OSError, json.JSONDecodeError, ValueError) as error:
print(f"Error: could not identify created Gitea review: {error}", file=sys.stderr)
raise SystemExit(1)
print(created_id)
PY
) || return 1
if ! readback_status=$(curl -sS -o "$readback_file" -w '%{http_code}' \
--config "$auth_config" \
-H 'User-Agent: mosaic-pr-review' \
"$GITEA_API_BASE/pulls/$pr_number/reviews/$created_id"); then
echo "Error: Gitea review read-back transport failed" >&2
return 1
fi
if [[ "$readback_status" != "200" ]]; then
echo "Error: Gitea review read-back failed with HTTP $readback_status" >&2
return 1
fi
EXPECTED_REVIEW_ID="$created_id" EXPECTED_STATE="$event" ACTING_LOGIN="$acting_login" \
EXPECTED_HEAD_SHA="$head_sha" EXPECTED_REVIEW_BODY="$review_body" \
python3 - "$readback_file" <<'PY' || return 1
import json
import os
import sys
try:
with open(sys.argv[1], encoding="utf-8") as response:
review = json.load(response)
if not isinstance(review, dict):
raise ValueError("response is not a review object")
expected_id = int(os.environ["EXPECTED_REVIEW_ID"])
expected_state = os.environ["EXPECTED_STATE"]
acting_login = os.environ["ACTING_LOGIN"]
expected_head = os.environ["EXPECTED_HEAD_SHA"]
expected_body = os.environ["EXPECTED_REVIEW_BODY"]
if review.get("id") != expected_id:
raise ValueError("read-back id does not match the created id")
if (review.get("user") or {}).get("login") != acting_login:
raise ValueError("created review is not authored by the acting identity")
if review.get("state") != expected_state:
raise ValueError("created review is not in the expected state")
if review.get("commit_id") != expected_head:
raise ValueError("created review is not pinned to the PR head commit")
# Bind to the exact submitted body. On Gitea v1.25.4 SubmitReview may
# finalize/reuse a pending review id whose Content was authored elsewhere;
# the exact GET exposes the persisted body, so a mismatch (a reused/foreign
# review carrying different Content) fails closed even when id/author/state/
# head all line up. Require presence + string TYPE + exact equality rather
# than `(body or "")`: the old coalesce treated a missing/null persisted body
# as equal to an empty submitted one, so a non-empty submitted body that
# persisted as null (a suppressed/lost body) would have passed. When a
# non-empty body was submitted the persisted value MUST be that exact string;
# when an empty body was submitted the persisted value must be empty or
# absent (a non-empty persisted body is likewise a divergence — vice-versa).
persisted_body = review.get("body")
if expected_body == "":
if persisted_body not in (None, ""):
raise ValueError("created review carries a body but none was submitted")
elif not isinstance(persisted_body, str) or persisted_body != expected_body:
raise ValueError("created review body does not match the submitted body")
except (OSError, json.JSONDecodeError, KeyError, TypeError, ValueError) as error:
print(f"Error: Gitea review persistence verification failed: {error}", file=sys.stderr)
raise SystemExit(1)
PY
# Current-head TOCTOU close-out: the review verified above is pinned to
# head_sha, but that head was read BEFORE the submit. Between then and now
# the PR branch may have advanced (a force-push or a new commit), which would
# leave this verified review attached to a now-superseded commit while the
# live tip carries unreviewed code — yet the wrapper would still report
# success. Re-read the LIVE PR head and require it STILL equals the submitted
# SHA; if it advanced, fail closed (nonzero, no created id emitted, no
# success line). This reuses the submit-scoped auth config + recheck file so
# it neither leaks the token to argv nor clobbers this function's cleanup.
live_head=$(gitea_read_pr_head_into "$pr_number" "$recheck_file" "$auth_config") || {
echo "Error: could not re-read Gitea PR head after review verification" >&2
return 1
}
if [[ "$live_head" != "$head_sha" ]]; then
echo "Error: Gitea PR head advanced from $head_sha to $live_head between review submit and verification; refusing to report a review pinned to a superseded commit (#865 current-head TOCTOU)" >&2
return 1
fi
echo "$created_id"
return 0
}
if [[ "$PLATFORM" == "github" ]]; then
case $ACTION in
approve)
gh pr review "$PR_NUMBER" --approve ${COMMENT:+--body "$COMMENT"}
echo "Approved GitHub PR #$PR_NUMBER"
;;
request-changes)
if [[ -z "$COMMENT" ]]; then
echo "Error: Comment required for request-changes"
exit 1
fi
gh pr review "$PR_NUMBER" --request-changes --body "$COMMENT"
echo "Requested changes on GitHub PR #$PR_NUMBER"
;;
comment)
if [[ -z "$COMMENT" ]]; then
echo "Error: Comment required"
exit 1
fi
gh pr review "$PR_NUMBER" --comment --body "$COMMENT"
echo "Added review comment to GitHub PR #$PR_NUMBER"
;;
*)
echo "Error: Unknown action: $ACTION"
exit 1
;;
esac
elif [[ "$PLATFORM" == "gitea" ]]; then
case $ACTION in
approve)
host=$(get_remote_host)
# A --login override always wins. Otherwise name this host's login
# only as a best effort: the login name merely selects a per-login
# token, and gitea_resolve_api_for_login falls back to the host
# credential (get_gitea_token) when no tea login is named — so a host
# tea's login list need not enumerate exotic (e.g. ported) hosts for
# the default credential to resolve. The single resolved token is
# then used for the write, the /user identity, and the read-back.
EFFECTIVE_LOGIN="$LOGIN_OVERRIDE"
[[ -n "$EFFECTIVE_LOGIN" ]] || EFFECTIVE_LOGIN=$(get_gitea_login_for_host "$host" 2>/dev/null || true)
# Bind the REST endpoint + token to the effective login, then derive
# the acting identity from that SAME credential so the review submit
# and its read-back verify against the identity that performed them.
gitea_resolve_api_for_login "$EFFECTIVE_LOGIN" "${LOGIN_OVERRIDE:+explicit}" || exit 1
ACTING_LOGIN=$(gitea_authenticated_login) || exit 1
head_sha=$(gitea_pr_head_sha "$PR_NUMBER") || exit 1
# The review body (if any) travels with the review itself in the REST
# submit — the created review record carries it — so there is no
# separate detached comment to reconcile.
review_id=$(gitea_submit_review_verified "$PR_NUMBER" "APPROVED" "$COMMENT" "$ACTING_LOGIN" "$head_sha") || {
echo "Error: could not submit and verify an APPROVED review on Gitea PR #$PR_NUMBER via a provider-returned created id (#865)." >&2
exit 1
}
echo "Approved and verified Gitea PR #$PR_NUMBER (review ID $review_id)"
;;
request-changes)
if [[ -z "$COMMENT" ]]; then
echo "Error: Comment required for request-changes"
exit 1
fi
host=$(get_remote_host)
# A --login override always wins. Otherwise name this host's login
# only as a best effort: the login name merely selects a per-login
# token, and gitea_resolve_api_for_login falls back to the host
# credential (get_gitea_token) when no tea login is named — so a host
# tea's login list need not enumerate exotic (e.g. ported) hosts for
# the default credential to resolve. The single resolved token is
# then used for the write, the /user identity, and the read-back.
EFFECTIVE_LOGIN="$LOGIN_OVERRIDE"
[[ -n "$EFFECTIVE_LOGIN" ]] || EFFECTIVE_LOGIN=$(get_gitea_login_for_host "$host" 2>/dev/null || true)
gitea_resolve_api_for_login "$EFFECTIVE_LOGIN" "${LOGIN_OVERRIDE:+explicit}" || exit 1
ACTING_LOGIN=$(gitea_authenticated_login) || exit 1
head_sha=$(gitea_pr_head_sha "$PR_NUMBER") || exit 1
review_id=$(gitea_submit_review_verified "$PR_NUMBER" "REQUEST_CHANGES" "$COMMENT" "$ACTING_LOGIN" "$head_sha") || {
echo "Error: could not submit and verify a REQUEST_CHANGES review on Gitea PR #$PR_NUMBER via a provider-returned created id (#865)." >&2
exit 1
}
echo "Requested changes and verified on Gitea PR #$PR_NUMBER (review ID $review_id)"
;;
comment)
if [[ -z "$COMMENT" ]]; then
echo "Error: Comment required"
exit 1
fi
host=$(get_remote_host)
# A --login override always wins. Otherwise name this host's login
# only as a best effort: the login name merely selects a per-login
# token, and gitea_resolve_api_for_login falls back to the host
# credential (get_gitea_token) when no tea login is named — so a host
# tea's login list need not enumerate exotic (e.g. ported) hosts for
# the default credential to resolve. The single resolved token is
# then used for the write, the /user identity, and the read-back.
EFFECTIVE_LOGIN="$LOGIN_OVERRIDE"
[[ -n "$EFFECTIVE_LOGIN" ]] || EFFECTIVE_LOGIN=$(get_gitea_login_for_host "$host" 2>/dev/null || true)
gitea_resolve_api_for_login "$EFFECTIVE_LOGIN" "${LOGIN_OVERRIDE:+explicit}" || exit 1
ACTING_LOGIN=$(gitea_authenticated_login) || exit 1
comment_id=$(gitea_create_comment_verified "$PR_NUMBER" "$COMMENT" "$ACTING_LOGIN") || {
echo "Error: could not create and verify a comment on Gitea PR #$PR_NUMBER via a provider-returned created id (#865)." >&2
exit 1
}
echo "Added and verified comment on Gitea PR #$PR_NUMBER (comment ID $comment_id)"
;;
*)
echo "Error: Unknown action: $ACTION"
exit 1
;;
esac
else
echo "Error: Unknown platform"
exit 1
fi