Files
stack/docs/concepts/memory-architecture.md
T
jason.woltje 193479b52d docs: concept annexation, provider/reference docs, ACT-1 groundwork
Mosaic concepts pages now own the adapted content; source/license
metadata under docs/reference/concepts. Adds ACT-1 agent-context
planning capture, pinned concept test package + preparation utility,
foundation observation notes (durability, evidence, federation,
onboarding, workflow), and the #1495 consolidation assessment.
TOOLS.md updated for the host-dev launcher.
2026-09-07 14:07:05 -05:00

2.2 KiB

Memory architecture

Status: design direction for later adaptation; this document does not introduce a memory service or change deployed user files.

Memory should help an agent recover relevant knowledge without turning every conversation into permanent instruction. Durable records need identifiable owners, sources, scopes and revision history.

Category Purpose
Instructions Reviewed behavior and operating rules
Curated knowledge Relevant facts and preferences with source evidence
Episodic records Observations, conversation evidence and work history
Future obligations Scoped event conditions or time-based schedules
Review artifacts Proposed updates and acceptance/rejection evidence

These categories do not prescribe a database or final monorepo directory layout.

Admission and retrieval

Treat external material, user statements, agent deductions, retrieved memories and system scaffolding as distinct origins. Repetition or retrieval must not upgrade trust. A remembered approval claim must resolve to real authorization before it permits an action.

Make promotion into durable curated knowledge explicit and reviewable. Preserve source scope, time, supersession and uncertainty. Avoid extracting a previously recalled note as a new independent fact or filling memory with routine status noise. Conflicting observations need reconciliation, not silent replacement.

Retrieve within the current user's/project's/workspace's permissions. Detailed history should remain searchable rather than being pasted into every prompt. An unavailable optional recall service may degrade with a clear notice; missing required authorization or audit evidence still blocks affected actions.

Recovery and deletion

The authoritative work record is separate from a convenient memory summary. Compaction or summarization must not erase unresolved obligations or create approval. Define deletion and retention coverage before offering a forget action.

See memory provenance, standing intents and foundation R28. ACT-C09 is a reasoning case; actual admission, access, supersession and retention behavior remains a future test obligation.