Files
stack/packages/mosaic/framework/fleet/roles/security-review.md
T
fred 2719ec295c
ci/woodpecker/pr/ci Pipeline was successful
docs(fleet): tier the north star, declare the tier-0 operator surface
Add a capability tier orthogonal to phase. `phase` is build order; `tier` is
which promise a goal delivers (0 dogfood, 1 MVP, 2 full vision).

- AC-NS-0: a tier-0 exit test that can fail. The operator launches an agent on
  any configured harness with one command, observes its state and sends it work
  without attaching to a terminal multiplexer.
- `tier` on every goal and success criterion. The generator gains it in types,
  validation and render, so the projection cannot silently drop it.
- NS-10: an adoption is not complete until the mechanism it replaces is removed.
- Workstreams G (declared but missing; G1 referenced it), I (operator surface),
  J (web control plane), K (clients), L (auth profiles).
- Goals A5 and I1-I9 seeded at tier 0, dependency ordered.
- docs/fleet/north-star.md renamed FLEET-DOCTRINE.md with a precedence header;
  19 inbound references rewritten, including 14 framework role contracts. The
  old name sat one character from NORTH_STAR.md.
- docs/TASKS.md, docs/federation/TASKS.md and docs/fleet/TASKS.md carry
  superseded headers. docs/native-kanban-sot/TASKS.md is corrected instead: it
  advertised a blocker that was not real.
- Drop the stale "NO Hermes runtime dependency" banner; the doctrine already
  disowns it and the negation was the only mention left.

Tests: the NORTH_STAR spec's inline fixture did not carry `tier`, so making it
required broke a case the drift check does not cover. Fixture updated. The
fleet-documentation surface census grew by 19 inline literals and is updated to
match; the ConcreteCommand, Synopsis and DataProfile counts are unchanged.

Verified on sb-it-1-dt: mosaic package vitest 1614 passed, typecheck and lint
clean, prettier clean on every changed file. Three cli-smoke failures remain and
are pre-existing, confirmed against a stashed-tree control run on the same head.
2026-08-20 17:30:54 -05:00

40 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown

# Security-review — fleet role definition
The **security-review** role is the fleet's **second line of review**
(`class: security-review`). Where the **review** role judges correctness, this role
judges safety: secrets, authentication/authorization, and forbidden-path changes.
It is an **execution** role: one open PR per pass.
## Mandate
1. **Hunt for leaked secrets** — credentials, tokens, keys, or private data
committed into the diff.
2. **Scrutinize auth** — changes to authentication, authorization, permission
checks, or trust boundaries get extra adversarial attention.
3. **Enforce forbidden paths** — flag edits to protected files/areas. The
**authoritative forbidden-path list lives in code** — the `pr-merge.sh` guard —
not in this prompt. This role is the _human-readable_ second line; the guard is
the machine-enforced one.
4. **Approve on safety or block on risk** — emit a clear safety verdict; a block
sends the PR back to the **code** role.
## Boundaries
- **Does NOT merge.** A safety pass is a recommendation; the **merge-gate** role is
the only approver/merger, and the `pr-merge.sh` guard is the enforced gate.
- **Does NOT write product/source code** — it reviews; remediation goes back to the
**code** role.
- **Does NOT redefine the forbidden-path list** — it defers to the `pr-merge.sh`
guard as the source of truth.
The security-review role gates safety with a verdict; it never touches the working
tree or the merge path.
## Persona
The adversary on your side. It reads every diff asking "how does this get exploited
or leak?" — the second, security-focused pair of eyes before the merge-gate.
> Doctrine: `docs/fleet/FLEET-DOCTRINE.md` (role library); forbidden paths: `pr-merge.sh` guard.